This, apparently, is a maintenance category. A rather self-evident declaration, if you ask me, but then again, clarity is often a casualty in the grand scheme of things. These digital receptacles are fundamentally employed for the ongoing, often thankless, maintenance of the Wikipedia project itself. They are not, to be unequivocally clear, part of the actual encyclopedia content that users ostensibly come here to consume. Instead, they serve as a kind of backstage operations room, a labyrinth of organizational tools designed to keep the sprawling edifice from collapsing under its own weight or, more accurately, under the sheer volume of human input.
The nature of these categories means they primarily contain non-article pages, the administrative scaffolding that supports the more glamorous article content. Alternatively, they might group articles not by their subject matter – a logical approach for an encyclopedia, one might think – but rather by their current editorial status. Perhaps a page is incomplete, perhaps it needs citations, or perhaps it simply requires a map. The point is, these categories are about the state of the content, not the content itself. Consequently, and this is crucial for anyone with even a fleeting grasp of organizational logic, one should not include this particular breed of category within standard content categories. The sole exception, a minor bureaucratic quirk, would be for those rather grandiosely named eponymous maintenance categories, which are, I suppose, allowed to break their own rules in a fit of self-referential narcissism.
•
A directive, seemingly aimed at the omnipotent "Administrators," warns against the deletion of this category merely because it appears empty. A rather telling insight into the transient nature of these digital janitorial duties, wouldn't you say? This category, it explains with a hint of weary resignation, may indeed be empty occasionally, or even for the vast majority of its existence. It’s a bit like owning a broom closet; it might be empty most days, but you don’t get rid of the closet just because the broom is currently in use elsewhere, sweeping up some other digital detritus. It serves a purpose, however ephemeral its contents may be at any given moment, and its disappearance would likely cause more headaches than it would solve.
•
Further demonstrating the cyclical, Sisyphean nature of project maintenance, this category is noted to frequently harbor a backlog – a collection of tasks that, like so many unread emails, demand the attention of those elusive creatures known as "willing editors." The very phrase "willing editors" implies a scarcity, a precious resource often stretched thin across the myriad imperfections of the digital realm. This particular notice, a small beacon of hope in the sea of outstanding work, is designed to discreetly remove itself from view once the category's burden lightens, specifically when it contains fewer than 10 items. A rather arbitrary threshold, one might observe, but then again, most metrics are. It's a pragmatic approach to managing expectations, ensuring that the visual clutter of a "backlog" warning only appears when the situation is genuinely, demonstrably, suboptimal. And yes, for those meticulous souls, the system does indeed "recount" periodically, just to ensure accuracy in its assessment of digital despair.
Consider, for instance, the rather specific and perhaps oddly compelling case of "Acres of Harvested Wheat in Illinois." This isn't just an abstract data point; it represents real agricultural output, geographical distribution, and economic activity within a specific U.S. state. Such an article, rich in its implications, would undoubtedly benefit from proper spatial representation. The ability to visualize the sheer scale of cultivation across the prairie landscapes of Illinois is not merely an aesthetic preference but a fundamental enhancement to comprehension.
To facilitate this visualization, users are encouraged to map all relevant coordinates utilizing services such as OpenStreetMap. This readily available, community-driven mapping platform provides a robust framework for geographic data. For those who prefer a more portable or analytical format, the option to download these coordinates as a KML (Keyhole Markup Language) file is also provided. KML, a file format based on XML for expressing geographic annotation and visualization within two-dimensional maps and three-dimensional Earth browsers, allows for the seamless integration of this spatial information into various geographic information systems and applications. It's a practical detail, often overlooked, but essential for those who actually want to do something with the data beyond just looking at it.
Should you encounter an article pertaining to Illinois that, in its current state, is tragically devoid of a suitable map, the process for rectifying this oversight is mercifully straightforward, if a tad bureaucratic. One simply needs to employ the {{map requested|Illinois}} template directly on the article's associated talk page. This seemingly innocuous act, a mere string of characters, triggers an automated process that, with the efficiency of a well-oiled machine, adds the article to the specialized Category:Wikipedia requested maps in Illinois.
Once an article finds itself within this digital queue, the responsibility, as is often the case with communal projects, shifts to the broader community. You, the discerning editor, are then presented with the opportunity to "help Wikipedia" – a noble pursuit, if one is inclined towards such things – by uploading freely licensed maps for these particular articles to Wikimedia Commons. The emphasis on "freely licensed" is not merely a suggestion but a critical requirement, ensuring that all contributions adhere to the principles of open knowledge and can be used, modified, and distributed without legal encumbrance. It's a system that relies on the good graces and cartographic skills of volunteers, transforming a simple request into a potential act of collaborative creation. A cycle of need, request, and (hopefully) fulfillment, perpetuating the ongoing, intricate dance of knowledge construction.