← Back to home

Justiciar

Ah, the title "Justiciar." A rather quaint relic, wouldn't you say? Like a dusty legal tome found in a forgotten library, full of pronouncements and hierarchies that seem impossibly distant from the messy reality of things. Still, if you insist on dissecting its historical bones, I suppose I can oblige. Just try not to expect any undue enthusiasm.

Justiciar: A Medieval Title for Judge or Minister

Let's clarify at the outset: this isn't about some obscure British barrister who fancied a pseudonym. For that particular individual, one would consult Vincent Powell-Smith. No, "Justiciar" is a far older, more substantive designation, an English iteration of the medieval Latin term justiciarius or justitiarius. In plain English, it meant "judge" or, more broadly, "Justice". But as with most things that carry weight, its significance expanded far beyond mere judicial pronouncements.

The Chief Justiciar, for instance, occupied a position of immense power. Think of them as the king's right-hand person, his chief minister, a role not entirely dissimilar to a modern Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. They were the linchpin, the one who kept the wheels of governance turning, especially when the monarch was otherwise occupied.

This office wasn't confined to England, of course. Its influence rippled across the nascent empires. In Ireland, the Justiciar of Ireland was a crucial figure, instrumental in the Anglo-Norman invasion of Ireland and the subsequent, shall we say, management of the conquered territories. And in Wales, after the rather decisive conquest of the Principality of Wales in the 13th century, the areas that were essentially personal fiefs of the English crown were placed under the watchful eyes of the Justiciar of North Wales and the Justiciar of South Wales. It's a pattern, isn't it? Control, governance, imposing order.

Scotland, predictably, had its own flavour of justiciars. Not just one, mind you, but often two or three: the Justiciar of Scotia, the Justiciar of Lothian, and, for a time in the 13th century, the Justiciar of Galloway. These roles eventually coalesced into a more national figure, the Lord Justice-General, a title that has since evolved into the modern Lord President of the Court of Session.

And the influence wasn't limited to the British Isles. Similar positions, bearing analogous responsibilities, cropped up in continental Europe, most notably in Norman Italy and even in Sweden. It seems the need for a figure who could dispense justice and manage affairs was a rather universal one.

England

In Norman England, the concept of royal justice was a growing beast. Kings, eager to centralize power, began delegating their judicial authority to members of the curia regis, the king's court. These delegates were the justiciars. King Henry I, a monarch known for his administrative acumen, saw the utility of having local justiciars oversee specific counties or clusters of them. However, it was under Henry II that the title of Chief Justiciar truly solidified, becoming exclusively associated with the king's principal minister.

The groundwork for this powerful office was laid in the aftermath of the Norman Conquest. With the King of England also holding the title of Duke of Normandy, he was often away, tending to affairs on the continent. During these absences, figures like William the Conqueror relied on trusted officers to act as viceroys, sometimes called regents, custodians, or prefects. When William Rufus ascended the throne, this temporary delegation began to morph into a more permanent, defined role. Rufus, in his characteristic fashion, entrusted the administration of government to his chaplain, Bishop Ranulf Flambard of Durham. Flambard, it is argued by historians like Frank Barlow, was effectively the first Chief Justiciar, even if the title wasn't officially bestowed upon him. He ran the government with an iron fist, regardless of Rufus's location. Contemporary chroniclers, such as Orderic Vitalis, noted his authority, describing him as a justiciarius.

The formal appointment of a Chief Justiciar seems to have occurred around 1107 or 1108, when Henry I appointed his chancellor, Roger of Salisbury. Roger was a man of considerable influence, described as secundus a rege, "second from the king." His purview extended to the administration of justice, ecclesiastical appointments, and, crucially, royal finances. Chroniclers like Symeon of Durham suggest that Roger was the architect of most decisions within the royal government. Historian Bryce Lyon aptly described him as a medieval prime minister, albeit one with far fewer constraints, his loyalty solely to the king.

The Chief Justiciar's responsibilities were vast: they oversaw the royal household, directed the curia regis, and managed the various government departments. They also presided over the exchequer, guiding its procedures, and supervised the itinerant justices who carried royal authority throughout the land. This was not a minor role; it demanded immense capability and often placed the justiciar in a position of considerable power, sometimes even a threat to the king himself. The office was typically held by a powerful noble or a high-ranking churchman.

The era of the great justiciars eventually waned. The last truly formidable figure in this role was Hubert de Burgh, 1st Earl of Kent, who was removed from office in 1232. Following this, the Lord Chancellor gradually absorbed much of the Chief Justiciar's former influence and prestige, becoming the king's second-in-command. By the time of King Edward I, the distinct roles of the King's Court were formalized, with separate justices heading the Court of Common Pleas, the Court of King's Bench, and the Court of Exchequer. The centralized office of Chief Justiciar effectively ceased to exist.

List of Chief Justiciars of England

This is a rather comprehensive list, detailing those who held this significant office:

Scotland

In Scotland, the justiciars were essentially the king's lieutenants, tasked with judicial and administrative duties. The office emerged in the 12th century, likely under Alexander I or his successor, David I. The title of 'Justiciar' was reserved for a select few high officials. The most prominent was the Justiciar of Scotia, whose jurisdiction extended north of the River Forth. South of that line, the Justiciar of Lothian handled matters. Over time, this role evolved into the modern Lord Justice-General, who heads the High Court of Justiciary and is the chief judicial officer in Scotland. Even today, the Duke of Argyll holds the hereditary title of High Justiciar of Argyll, though it carries no practical responsibilities.

Wales

Following Edward I of England's thorough conquest of the Principality of Wales between 1277 and 1283, the Statute of Rhuddlan laid down the framework for governing the areas under direct royal control. The newly established counties of Anglesey, Caernarfonshire, and Merioneth were administered by the Justiciar of North Wales. Similarly, Carmarthenshire and [Cardiganshire] were placed under the authority of the Justiciar of South Wales. This is where things get a bit… sparse. This section, unfortunately, lacks the necessary citations and verifiability to be fully robust. It’s a common failing in historical accounts, leaving gaps that invite speculation.

Ireland

The title of Justiciar, or Chief Justiciar, was a familiar one in Ireland for centuries after the Norman invasion of Ireland. It was held by the chief governor of Ireland. However, by the 15th century, the primary title shifted to the King's Lieutenant, with the justiciar becoming a subordinate role that eventually morphed into the Lords Justices of Ireland. Again, this part of the historical record could benefit from more rigorous citation.

Other Jurisdictions

The title wasn't exclusively British. Henry II of England also bestowed the title of Justiciar upon the Seneschal of Normandy.

In the 12th-century Norman kingdom of Sicily, a magister justitiarius emerged. This figure presided over the Royal Court, the Magna Curia, and, along with assistants, had the authority to decide cases reserved for the Crown. It's not entirely clear if this office was a direct import from England; it might have stemmed from a shared Norman practice implemented in both regions. By the 13th century, justiciar roles were established in various localities across Sicily.

Even in medieval Sweden, the concept found a parallel. The lagman, or "lawspeaker", served as a provincial judge, knowledgeable in the law. Because this role aligns with the general meaning of "justiciar," it's often translated as such in English texts. The lagmän were typically members of the Senate, akin to the English Privy Council. Furthermore, the Swedish term "riksdrots" is frequently rendered as "Lord High Justiciar of Sweden."

It's a complex tapestry, isn't it? A title that signifies power, justice, and administration, woven through the history of several kingdoms. And yet, like so much of the past, its true essence can be elusive, buried under layers of time and the inevitable gaps in documentation.