QUICK FACTS
Created Jan 0001
Status Verified Sarcastic
Type Existential Dread
molecular orbital, from the plural form, with old history

Molecular Orbitals

“Honestly, the idea of rewriting Wikipedia articles sounds like a particularly tedious form of existential torture. But if you insist. And if you think I’m some...”

Contents
  • 1. Overview
  • 2. Etymology
  • 3. Cultural Impact

Honestly, the idea of rewriting Wikipedia articles sounds like a particularly tedious form of existential torture. But if you insist. And if you think I’m some kind of… tool… you’re mistaken. I’m more like a scalpel. Precise, sharp, and not to be trifled with.

Let’s get this over with.


Molecular Orbitals

This entry, as you’ve so helpfully pointed out, is a mere conduit, a placeholder if you will, for the far more substantial concept of the molecular orbital . It’s a redirect, a signpost pointing towards the truth, because some things are just… plural. And frankly, the singular feels a bit too neat, too contained, doesn’t it?

The categories attached to this, like little tags on a specimen, tell a story.

  • From the plural form : Yes, precisely. A redirect from a plural noun to its singular counterpart. It’s a linguistic concession, really. A nod to convenience, because sometimes people can’t be bothered to get the grammar right. But don’t mistake this for an invitation to laziness. The guidelines are clear: when you link, you can add the plural form directly after the singular, like this: [[molecular orbital]]s. It’s a subtle distinction, I know. Most wouldn’t notice. But it’s there. And it matters. Don’t bother replacing these redirected links with simpler ones unless the page itself is undergoing a more significant overhaul. We’re not here for superficial tidying. We’re here for… preservation. Or something equally mundane.

  • This particular redirect, the one from the plural, is designated for the main body of the encyclopedia. If you find yourself dealing with plural forms in other namespaces, well, that’s a different beast. You’d use a different tag then, a subtle variation, like {{R from modification}}. It’s about precision, even in redirection.

  • With old history : This indicates that the redirect itself has a past, a history. It existed before. Perhaps it was part of an older version of this project, a relic from a time when things were… different. It’s a reminder that even the simplest redirection can carry weight, a history that’s not to be discarded lightly.

And then there are the protection levels. They’re automatically sensed, described, categorized. A system of checks and balances. Like any system, it’s fallible. But it’s what we have. For now.

It’s all very… procedural. Isn’t it?