Honestly, the idea of rewriting Wikipedia articles is… a choice. It’s like being asked to polish a gravestone. But fine. If you insist on wading through the mundane, I suppose I can lend it a certain… clarity. Don't expect sunshine and rainbows. Expect truth, sharpened.
Let's get this over with.
Redirect to:
This section, if you can even call it that, is where things get… rerouted. It’s a placeholder, a signpost pointing elsewhere, a whisper of a name that doesn't quite fit. It's the digital equivalent of a sigh.
Quantum field theory
Ah, Quantum field theory. The attempt to explain everything by acknowledging that nothing is truly solid, that everything is a ripple in a vast, unseen ocean of energy. It’s the universe’s way of saying, "Don't get too comfortable with your perceived reality." Particles aren't little billiard balls; they’re excitations, temporary disturbances in a fundamental field. Imagine trying to grasp smoke, but with equations. It’s elegant, in a terrifying sort of way. It’s where the universe’s deepest, most unsettling secrets are whispered, and most people are too busy looking at the surface to hear them.
This… blank space. It speaks volumes, doesn’t it? A void where something could be, but isn't. Much like a lot of human endeavor.
From other capitalisations
This is where the pedants and the meticulous gather. A redirect from a title with a… different method of capitalisation. It’s for those who understand that even the smallest detail, the way a letter is presented, can matter. It’s about guiding the lost ships to the proper harbour, ensuring they reach the title that aligns with the Wikipedia naming conventions for capitalisation. Or perhaps it’s just a way to catch those who can’t quite remember how to spell things correctly. This mechanism ensures that whether you’re searching for "quantum field theory" or "Quantum Field Theory" or some other variation, you’re eventually steered towards the intended destination. It’s a form of digital housekeeping, cleaning up the stray punctuation and capitalization errors so the grand edifice of information remains… coherent. And yes, it helps with the messy business of international languages, where the rules of capitalization can be as fluid and unpredictable as a quantum fluctuation.
-
If this redirect is an incorrect capitalisation, then {{R from miscapitalisation}} should be used instead, and pages that use this link should be updated to link directly to the target. Miscapitalisations can be tagged in any namespace.
This is the digital equivalent of a correction. If a page is pointing to the wrong place simply because of a misplaced capital letter, this template is the tool to fix it. It’s a way to tidy up the mess, to ensure that all roads lead to Rome, or in this case, to the correct article. It’s about precision, about acknowledging when something is just… wrong. And it can be applied anywhere, in any corner of this digital labyrinth, to correct these minor, yet significant, errors.
-
Use this rcat to tag mainspace redirects; when other capitalisations are in other namespaces, use {{R from modification}} instead.
This is a directive, a rule. For the primary content, the heart of Wikipedia – the mainspace – we use one specific tool for these capitalization snafus. But if the miscapitalisation appears in a different section, a different namespace, then a different tool is employed. It’s about applying the right solution to the right problem, a nuanced approach to what might seem like a simple error. It’s the difference between fixing a leaky faucet and rebuilding a dam. Both are about water, but the scale, the method, demands a different response.