The Shawnee, a Native American people of the Northeastern Woodlands, represent a testament to enduring cultural identity amidst relentless displacement and profound historical upheaval. Their narrative, a tapestry woven with threads of resilience, strategic alliance, and unyielding resistance, traces a path through centuries of profound change across the North American continent. Their intricate language, Shawnee, a vibrant branch of the larger Algonquian language family, serves as a crucial anchor to their heritage, even as its fluency faces modern challenges.

This article delves into the rich history and cultural intricacies of the Shawnee, exploring their ancestral lands, their complex interactions with European colonial powers and other Indigenous nations, and their eventual relocation to what is now Oklahoma. For those seeking further distinction, the name "Shawnee" may refer to other contexts, detailed at Shawnee (disambiguation).

---

Ethnic group

The Shawnee people, historically recognized for their widespread influence and strategic prowess, have navigated centuries of immense change. The enduring image of a Shawnee leader like Tenskwatawa (1775–1836), often referred to as "The Shawnee Prophet," captured in portraits such as the one by Charles Bird King around 1820, speaks volumes of their spiritual depth and leadership during critical periods.

With a current total population of 7,584 enrolled members, the Shawnee people are primarily concentrated in the United States, specifically within Oklahoma where their federally recognized tribal governments are based. Historically, their presence stretched across a vast geographical expanse, encompassing regions that would eventually become the states of Ohio, Pennsylvania, Indiana, and numerous surrounding territories. Their cultural and linguistic ties connect them to other significant Algonquian nations, including the Miami, Menominee, and Cheyenne, underscoring a shared heritage that speaks of deep historical connections.

The Shawnee language, or saawanwaatoweewe, remains a vital element of their identity, though like many Indigenous languages, it faces the challenges of revitalization. Their spiritual traditions are rooted in Indigenous religions, reflecting a profound connection to the land and ancestral practices. A visual collage of Shawnee individuals encapsulates the diversity and continuity of this remarkable people.

The Shawnee, pronounced /ʃɔːˈni/ (shaw-NEE), are a distinguished Native American people of the Northeastern Woodlands. Their language, Shawnee, stands as a significant member of the expansive Algonquian language family, linking them culturally and historically to many other nations across the continent.

Their ancestral lands, prior to the widespread disruptions of European contact, were most likely concentrated in the southern stretches of what is now Ohio. This region served as a vital cultural and economic hub for the Shawnee for centuries. However, the 17th century witnessed a significant dispersal of their communities, as they spread across vast territories including Ohio, Illinois, Maryland, Delaware, and Pennsylvania. This initial scattering was often a strategic response to encroaching colonial pressures and intertribal conflicts, a pattern that would tragically repeat throughout their history.

By the early 18th century, a substantial portion of the Shawnee people had reconcentrated their settlements, largely in eastern Pennsylvania. Yet, this period of relative stability was fleeting. Later in the same century, further pressures led to another widespread dispersal, with Shawnee communities establishing themselves across Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Kentucky, Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois. A smaller, yet notable, group journeyed south to join their Muscogee people relatives in what would become Alabama, demonstrating the extensive reach of their kinship networks and their adaptability in seeking new homes.

The 19th century marked a particularly devastating chapter in Shawnee history, characterized by the relentless policies of the U.S. federal government and the implementation of the 1830 Indian Removal Act. Under this act, the Shawnee, along with countless other Indigenous nations, were forcibly removed from their ancestral domains to lands situated west of the Mississippi River. These new, often unfamiliar territories would eventually be carved into the states of Missouri, Kansas, and Texas. The final, agonizing chapter of their forced relocation culminated in their removal to the designated Indian Territory, a region that would ultimately achieve statehood as Oklahoma in the early 20th century. A history, one might observe, of being perpetually "elsewhere."

Today, the descendants of these resilient people are formally recognized by the federal government within three distinct federally recognized tribes. These sovereign nations include the Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma, the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma, and the Shawnee Tribe. All three tribes maintain their headquarters within Oklahoma, continuing to uphold their cultural heritage and govern their people in the face of a history designed to erase them.

Etymology

The nomenclature associated with the Shawnee people, a critical aspect of their identity, has seen various interpretations and spellings throughout historical records. Beyond the most common "Shawnee," forms such as "Shaawana" and "Shawanese" have been documented, reflecting the challenges of transcribing Indigenous languages into European scripts over centuries. Linguistically, individual Shawnee people or specific tribes might be referred to as šaawanwa, while the collective body of the Shawnee people is often denoted by šaawanwaki or šaawanooki. These terms, while seemingly subtle variations, carry the weight of specific grammatical and cultural nuances within the Shawnee language itself.

Intriguingly, the etymological roots of "Shawnee" are often traced back to Algonquian languages, which possess words that bear a striking phonetic resemblance to the archaic term shawano (now more accurately rendered as shaawanwa), meaning "south." However, a deeper linguistic examination reveals a more nuanced truth within the Shawnee language specifically. The stem šawa- within Shawnee does not directly translate to "south" in the way one might intuitively expect. Instead, it conveys a meaning closer to "moderate" or "warm," particularly when describing weather conditions. As noted by the esteemed linguist Charles F. Voegelin in his seminal work on Shawnee stems, "šawa (plus -ni, -te) Moderate, Warm. Cp. šawani 'it is moderating...'" This distinction highlights the intricate and sometimes misleading nature of direct linguistic translation, suggesting a broader concept of warmth or tempering rather than a cardinal direction alone.

Further insight into this etymological puzzle can be found within Shawnee oral traditions and mythology. In one recorded Shawnee tale, a deity named "Sawage" (or šaawaki) is presented as the embodiment of the south wind. The scholar Jeremiah Curtin, in his translation of this narrative, interprets "Sawage" as "it thaws," directly linking the south wind to the arrival of warmer, moderating weather. This interpretation aligns perfectly with Voegelin's linguistic observations. Moreover, accounts and songs meticulously collected by C. F. Voegelin himself further attest to šaawaki as the spirit of the South, or the South Wind, solidifying the cultural and linguistic connection between the concept of "warmth" and the direction from which it often originates. It seems the Shawnee understood that the south brought not just a direction, but a change in the very atmosphere, a nuance lost in simpler translations.

Language

The Shawnee language, known to its speakers as saawanwaatoweewe, stands as a critical pillar of Shawnee identity and cultural continuity. As a member of the broader Algonquian family, it shares linguistic heritage with many other Indigenous languages of the Eastern Woodlands. However, like numerous Native American languages, Shawnee has faced significant challenges in the modern era. In 2002, a comprehensive assessment indicated that the language was in a state of decline, with approximately 200 fluent speakers remaining. This number included over 100 members of the Absentee Shawnee Tribe and a smaller contingent of 12 speakers from the Shawnee Tribe.

The trend of decline unfortunately continued. By 2017, dedicated advocates for the Shawnee language, among them the respected tribal member George Blanchard, estimated that the number of fluent speakers had dwindled to fewer than 100 individuals. A poignant reality is that the vast majority of these fluent speakers are now over the age of 50, highlighting the urgent need for intergenerational transmission and robust language revitalization efforts. The loss of a language is not merely the loss of words, but the erosion of unique ways of knowing, perceiving, and interacting with the world.

Despite these challenges, efforts to preserve and promote saawanwaatoweewe persist. The language is typically rendered in the Latin script, adapted to capture its distinct phonetics. However, the path to creating a universally adopted and unified spelling system has proven to be an ongoing struggle, reflecting internal dialectal variations and differing approaches to orthography. This lack of a single, standardized written form can present additional hurdles for learners and documentarians, though it also speaks to the organic evolution of the language.

On a more encouraging note, resources for language preservation do exist. A dedicated dictionary of the Shawnee language has been compiled, providing a valuable tool for both native speakers and those embarking on the journey of learning. Furthermore, portions of the Bible have been translated into Shawnee, offering linguistic documentation and demonstrating the adaptability of the language to new textual forms. These efforts, though arduous, are vital in ensuring that the voice of the Shawnee ancestors continues to resonate through the generations, a quiet act of defiance against the relentless march of assimilation.

History

The history of the Shawnee people is a sprawling epic, marked by deep roots in the North American continent, complex societal structures, and an almost ceaseless struggle for self-determination against the backdrop of colonial expansion. Their narrative is not merely a collection of dates and events, but a living testament to cultural resilience, adaptability, and the profound impact of external pressures on Indigenous communities.

Precontact history

To truly understand the Shawnee, one must first look back to the expansive epoch preceding European contact, a period rich with the development of sophisticated Indigenous societies. For broader context on this era, further information can be found on Algonquian peoples and the theoretical Proto-Algonquian language.

Fort Ancient Monongahela cultures

The precise origins of the Shawnee people remain a subject of scholarly debate, a common, yet often frustrating, characteristic of pre-Columbian era history. One prominent theory posits that the Shawnee are direct descendants of the Fort Ancient culture, a complex and thriving society that once dominated the Ohio region. This hypothesis, while compelling due to geographical and cultural overlaps, is not universally accepted. An alternative perspective suggests that the Shawnee may have arrived in the area at a later historical juncture, subsequently occupying sites previously inhabited by the Fort Ancient people. The nuance here is crucial: did they evolve from, or merely succeed, the Fort Ancient inhabitants? The archaeological record, while rich, sometimes leaves gaps that defy definitive answers, forcing reliance on inference and oral tradition.

The Fort Ancient culture itself represents a significant chapter in North American prehistory, flourishing for approximately six and a half centuries, from around 1000 to 1650 CE. These industrious people predominantly inhabited lands straddling both banks of the Ohio River, extending across areas that now constitute southern Ohio, northern Kentucky, and western West Virginia. Much like the renowned Mississippian culture peoples of the same period, the Fort Ancient communities engaged in the monumental construction of earthwork mounds, structures that were far more than mere piles of earth. These mounds served as integral expressions of their intricate religious beliefs and sophisticated political structures, embodying their worldview in tangible form.

Initially, scholars often viewed Fort Ancient culture as a regional offshoot or extension of the grander Mississippian culture. However, contemporary archaeological and anthropological research has led to a re-evaluation of this relationship. It is now widely believed that Fort Ancient culture (1000–1650 CE) actually developed independently, descending from the earlier Hopewell culture (100 BCE–500 CE). The Hopewell people, too, were prolific mound builders, creating impressive earthworks as central components of their social, political, and religious systems. Among their most iconic monuments is the Serpent Mound in present-day Ohio, an astonishing effigy mound that continues to captivate and mystify, a silent testament to ancient engineering and spiritual devotion.

The ultimate fate of the Fort Ancient people remains shrouded in a veil of uncertainty, a common and rather tragic theme for many pre-contact societies. The most plausible explanation, echoing the widespread devastation observed among the Mississippian culture to the south, is that their society suffered catastrophic disruption from waves of new infectious diseases. These virulent pathogens were inadvertently introduced by the earliest Spanish explorers who ventured into the continent during the 16th century, long before direct sustained contact with many interior groups. Lacking immunity, Indigenous populations were decimated. Evidence from sites like Madisonville, the type site for Fort Ancient culture, indicates a dramatic shift after 1525. House sizes diminished, their numbers decreased, and the archaeological record shows a distinct departure from their previously "horticulture-centered, sedentary way of life" – a phrase that barely scratches the surface of the profound societal collapse implied.

A notable lacuna exists in the archaeological record, a temporal gap between the most recent Fort Ancient sites and the earliest confirmed sites of the historic Shawnee. This discontinuity presents a challenge to the direct lineage theory. Nevertheless, scholars generally accept that compelling similarities in material culture, artistic expressions, mythology, and, critically, Shawnee oral history, collectively bridge this gap. These shared elements strongly suggest a developmental continuum from Fort Ancient society to the historical Shawnee society as recorded by European observers. Yet, one must acknowledge the complexity, as there is also archaeological and oral historical evidence that links Siouan-speaking nations to the Ohio Valley, indicating a diverse and dynamic pre-contact landscape.

The Shawnee held a unique and respected position among their Algonquian-speaking brethren. They traditionally regarded the Lenape (also known as the Delaware) of the East Coast's mid-Atlantic region, who shared their Algonquian linguistic heritage, as their "grandfathers." This designation implied a deep respect and a recognition of the Lenape's ancient lineage and significant cultural influence. Conversely, the Algonquian nations residing in present-day Canada, whose territories extended inland along the majestic St. Lawrence River and around the vast expanse of the Great Lakes from the Atlantic coast, acknowledged the Shawnee as their southernmost branch. This intricate web of relationships, stretching across immense distances, speaks to a sophisticated understanding of kinship and political geography among Indigenous nations long before European cartographers attempted to impose their own boundaries. Along the East Coast, the Algonquian-speaking tribes generally occupied the fertile coastal areas, their presence extending from the northern reaches of Quebec down to the Carolinas, demonstrating a remarkable cultural and linguistic spread.

17th century

The 17th century ushered in an era of increasing, though often indirect, contact between the Shawnee and European powers, leading to a complex and often turbulent period of migrations and strategic adjustments. Early European reports reveal the Shawnee as a widely dispersed people, their presence noted across a broad geographical spectrum. One of the earliest documented mentions of the Shawnee might be found on a 1614 Dutch map, which tentatively places a group labeled "Sawwanew" just east of the Delaware River. Subsequent Dutch sources from later in the 17th century corroborate this general location. In stark contrast, accounts from French explorers during the same period consistently located the Shawnee primarily along the Ohio River. These French encounters typically occurred during their extensive forays from eastern Canada and the strategically vital Illinois Country, highlighting the Shawnee's presence in a critical interior waterway.

Based on these historical accounts and subsequent archaeological investigations, John E. Kleber provides a vivid, if brief, description of Shawnee towns during this period:

"A Shawnee town might have from forty to one hundred bark-covered houses similar in construction to Iroquois longhouses. Each village usually had a meeting house or council house, perhaps sixty to ninety feet long, where public deliberations took place."

This description reveals a settled, organized community structure, with significant architectural undertakings reflecting communal governance and social cohesion.

An intriguing, though perhaps apocryphal, English colonial legend suggests a distinct origin for some Shawnee. This narrative claims they descended from a party dispatched by Chief Opechancanough, the formidable ruler of the Powhatan Confederacy from 1618–1644, to establish a settlement in the fertile Shenandoah Valley. This party was supposedly led by his son, Sheewa-a-nee. Further complicating this narrative, Edward Bland, an explorer who accompanied Abraham Wood's expedition in 1650, recorded an account of a past falling-out. He stated that in Opechancanough's time, a conflict arose between the Chawan chief and the weroance of the Powhatan (who was also a relative of Opechancanough's family), resulting in the latter murdering the former. These early colonial narratives, while often biased, offer glimpses into the complex political landscape of Indigenous nations. Another significant factor in Shawnee movements was external pressure: the Shawnee were "driven from Kentucky in the 1670s by the Iroquois of Pennsylvania and New York, who claimed the Ohio valley as hunting ground to supply its fur trade." This illustrates the profound impact of intertribal conflicts, often exacerbated by European economic interests. In 1671, the English colonists Batts and Fallam observed the Shawnee actively contesting control of the Shenandoah Valley with the Haudenosaunee Confederacy (Iroquois) that year, and, tellingly, they appeared to be losing ground, further underscoring the dynamic and often violent nature of territorial claims.

Sometime prior to 1670, a distinct group of Shawnee undertook a significant migration, relocating to the area surrounding the Savannah River. These Shawnee established contact with the English colonists based in Charles Town, South Carolina, in 1674, initiating what would become a long-lasting and often mutually beneficial alliance. To the Carolina English, these particular Shawnee became known simply as the "Savannah Indians," a geographical identifier that belied their broader tribal identity. Around the same historical juncture, other Shawnee groups embarked on migrations to diverse regions, including Florida, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and various territories situated both south and east of the Ohio Country. This widespread movement speaks to a strategic adaptability, perhaps seeking to avoid conflict or capitalize on new trade opportunities.

Pierre Le Moyne d'Iberville, the visionary founder of New Orleans and the nascent French colony of La Louisiane, penned an insightful observation in his journal in 1699. He described the Shawnee (whom he rendered as Chaouenons) with a note of caution, characterizing them as "the single nation to fear, being spread out over Carolina and Virginia in the direction of the Mississippi." This assessment from a shrewd colonial leader highlights the Shawnee's considerable reputation as formidable warriors and their extensive geographic reach, which made them a significant, if dispersed, power.

The historian Alan Gallay offers a compelling speculation regarding the underlying impetus for these widespread Shawnee migrations during the mid to late 17th century: he suggests they were most likely driven by the devastating Beaver Wars. These brutal conflicts, which commenced in the 1640s, saw nations of the Iroquois Confederacy launch aggressive invasions from the east, intent on securing the vast Ohio Valley as exclusive hunting grounds. The Shawnee, caught in this maelstrom of territorial expansion and resource control, were forced to adapt or face annihilation.

Consequently, the Shawnee became renowned for their remarkably widespread settlements, their presence extending from Pennsylvania in the east, across Illinois in the west, and down to Georgia in the south. Among their historically documented villages were Eskippakithiki in Kentucky, Sonnionto (also identified as Lower Shawneetown) in Ohio, Chalakagay near the modern-day location of Sylacauga, Alabama, Chalahgawtha at the site of present-day Chillicothe, Ohio, Old Shawneetown, Illinois, and Suwanee, Georgia. This extensive network of communities facilitated their emergence as a central force in intertribal relations. Their language, Shawnee, remarkably, evolved into a lingua franca for trade and diplomacy among a multitude of diverse tribes, underscoring their influence. More than mere traders, they became pivotal leaders among Indigenous nations, consistently initiating and sustaining widespread intertribal resistance to the relentless expansion of both European and Euro-American colonial powers. They were, in essence, the vanguard of a desperate, yet determined, defense.

18th century

The 18th century brought an intensified period of contact, conflict, and shifting alliances for the Shawnee, as colonial expansion accelerated and the geopolitical landscape of North America grew increasingly volatile. A 1715 map, explicitly showing the "Chaouanons" (Shawnee), visually attests to their recognized territorial presence during this pivotal era.

Some Shawnee communities maintained a presence in central Pennsylvania. For a period, these groups found themselves without a recognized principal chief. In 1714, in a move indicative of their diplomatic acumen, they formally requested Carondawana, an influential Oneida war chief, to act as their representative to the Pennsylvania provincial council. This unusual arrangement highlights the complex intertribal political dynamics of the time. Around 1727, Carondawana and his wife, the renowned interpreter Madame Montour, established their settlement at Otstonwakin, situated on the west bank at the confluence of Loyalsock Creek and the West Branch Susquehanna River, further cementing their roles as intermediaries.

By 1730, the burgeoning tide of European American settlers began to arrive in significant numbers in the fertile Shenandoah Valley of Virginia. In the northern reaches of this valley, the Shawnee held a predominant position. However, their lands and, by extension, their sovereignty, were simultaneously claimed as tributary territory by the Haudenosaunee or Six Nations of the Iroquois to the north, a legacy of earlier conflicts and treaties. This overlapping claim created a precarious situation. Adding to the complexity, the Iroquois had facilitated the resettlement of some of the Tuscarora people from North Carolina—who were also Iroquoian-speaking and distant relations—in the vicinity of what is now Martinsburg, West Virginia. Most of the Tuscarora, however, undertook a more extensive migration to New York, settling near the Oneida people and ultimately becoming the sixth nation of the Iroquois Confederacy, a migration they formally declared complete in 1722. This period also saw frequent, often violent, clashes in the Shawnee-inhabited regions of the Valley, as Seneca (an Iroquois nation) and Lenape war parties from the north engaged in pitched battles with pursuing bands of Catawba from Virginia. The valley, it seems, was rarely peaceful.

By the late 1730s, the relentless pressure of colonial expansion intensified, leading to an increasing frequency of conflicts. Shawnee communities also grappled with the profound and often destructive impacts of the burgeoning fur trade. While the trade provided access to desirable European arms and goods, it also introduced a devastating commodity: rum and brandy. The widespread availability and consumption of alcohol rapidly led to severe social problems within Shawnee communities, undermining traditional structures and health. In response to this crisis, several Shawnee communities within the Province of Pennsylvania, under the leadership of Peter Chartier, a prominent Métis trader of French-Canadian and Shawnee descent, vehemently opposed the sale of alcohol in their territories. This principled stance, however, brought them into direct conflict with colonial Governor Patrick Gordon, who, predictably, was under considerable pressure from powerful traders to permit the lucrative sale of rum and brandy. Feeling unable to adequately protect their people and cultural integrity, approximately 400 Shawnee made the difficult decision in 1745 to migrate from Pennsylvania to new lands in Ohio, Kentucky, Alabama, and Illinois, desperately hoping to escape the corrosive influence of the traders and their destructive wares.

Prior to 1754, a significant Shawnee headquarters was located at Shawnee Springs, near modern-day Cross Junction, Virginia. It was here that the father of the formidable chief Cornstalk held his council, indicating its importance as a political and social center. The northern Shenandoah Valley also hosted several other notable Shawnee villages: one near Moorefield, West Virginia, situated on the North River; and another on the Potomac River near Cumberland, Maryland. In 1753, messengers from the Shawnee communities on the Scioto River in the Ohio Country extended an invitation to their kin still residing in the Shenandoah Valley, urging them to cross the formidable Allegheny Mountains and join the larger Shawnee population further west. This invitation was heeded, and by the following year, a significant migration had taken place. The community known as Shannoah, or Lower Shawneetown, situated on the Ohio River, experienced substantial growth, swelling to approximately 1,200 inhabitants by 1750, a testament to its strategic importance and the ongoing consolidation of Shawnee populations in the Ohio region.

The journal of Nicholas Cresswell offers a striking, if ethnocentric, snapshot of Shawnee leaders in 1774, after a period of conflict with the Virginians:

"[I] saw four Indian Chiefs of the Shawnee Nation, who have been at War with the Virginians this summer (i.e. 1774), but have made peace with them, and they are sending these people to Williamsburg as hostages. They are tall, manly, well-shaped men, of a Copper colour with black hair, quick piercing eyes, and good features. They have rings of silver in their nose and bobs to them which hang over their upper lip. Their ears are cut from the tips two thirds of the way round and the piece extended with brass wire till it touches their shoulders, in this part they hang a thin silver plate, wrought in flourishes about three inches diameter, with plates of silver round their arms and in the hair, which is all cut off except a long lock on the top of the head. They are in white men's dress, except breeches which they refuse to wear, instead of which they have a girdle round them with a piece of cloth drawn through their legs and turned over the girdle, and appears like a short apron before and behind. All the hair is pulled from their eyebrows and eyelashes and their faces painted in different parts with Vermilion. They walk remarkably straight and cut a grotesque appearance in this mixed dress."

This detailed description, though filtered through a colonial lens, provides valuable insight into Shawnee appearance, adornment, and cultural practices of the era, particularly their distinct hairstyles and body modifications which were often misinterpreted or exoticized by European observers.

In the wake of the devastating Beaver Wars, the Haudenosaunee Confederacy had asserted a claim to the vast Ohio Country, declaring it their exclusive hunting ground by right of conquest. Consequently, they treated the Shawnee and Lenape who had resettled there as dependent tribes, a status the latter often chafed under. Adding another layer of complexity to the region's demographics, independent Iroquois bands, drawn from various tribes within the Confederacy, also migrated westward. These groups, distinct from the main Iroquois body, became known in Ohio as the Mingo. These three distinct nations—the Shawnee, the Delaware (Lenape), and the Mingo—formed a close, albeit sometimes uneasy, association with one another, despite the inherent differences in their linguistic heritage. The Shawnee and Delaware spoke Algonquian languages, while the Mingo spoke an Iroquoian language, a testament to the fluid and often pragmatic nature of intertribal alliances.

After initially participating in the first phase of the French and Indian War (a conflict also known to some as "Braddock's War") as crucial allies of the French, the Shawnee executed a strategic shift in 1758. They formally concluded peace with the British colonies at the pivotal Treaty of Easton. This treaty, a significant diplomatic achievement for both sides, recognized the formidable Allegheny Ridge (effectively the Eastern Divide) as a mutually agreed-upon border, intended to delineate the limits of colonial expansion and Indigenous territory. This period of peace, however, proved to be tragically brief, lasting only until Pontiac's War erupted in 1763. This widespread Indigenous uprising was a direct response to Britain's decisive victory over France and its subsequent assertion of control over all French territories east of the Mississippi River in North America. Later that same year, the British Crown, in a gesture meant to placate Indigenous nations and stabilize the frontier, issued the Proclamation of 1763, which legally reaffirmed the 1758 border as the firm limit of British colonization and formally reserved the lands beyond for Native Americans. Yet, the Crown, with its limited capacity for enforcement, found it exceedingly difficult to halt the relentless westward movement of Anglo-European colonists, who continued to disregard the boundary with impunity.

The Treaty of Fort Stanwix, negotiated in 1768, further exacerbated tensions by unilaterally extending the colonial boundary far to the west. This effectively granted British colonists a dubious claim to vast tracts of land in what are now the states of West Virginia and Kentucky. Crucially, the Shawnee did not agree to this treaty, nor were they adequately consulted. The agreement was brokered primarily between British officials and the Haudenosaunee Confederacy, who, despite their claims of sovereignty over the land, did not exclusively occupy it. The Shawnee and numerous other Native American tribes also hunted extensively in these territories, making the Iroquois's cession highly contentious. In the aftermath of the Stanwix treaty, Anglo-Americans began to pour into the fertile Ohio River Valley in unprecedented numbers, seeking new settlements and frequently traveling by boats and barges along the river's vital artery. This influx inevitably led to an escalation of violent incidents between settlers and Indigenous peoples, ultimately igniting Lord Dunmore's War in 1774.

During this conflict, British diplomats, with calculated precision, managed to isolate the Shawnee. Both the Iroquois and the Lenape nations, for their own complex reasons, maintained a precarious neutrality. Consequently, the Shawnee found themselves confronting the formidable British colony of Virginia with only a few Mingo allies, a stark imbalance of power. Lord Dunmore, the royal governor of Virginia, launched a two-pronged invasion into the Ohio Country. The Shawnee chief Cornstalk valiantly attacked one wing of the Virginian forces, fighting to a hard-won draw in the sole major engagement of the war, the Battle of Point Pleasant. Despite this tactical stalemate, the subsequent Treaty of Camp Charlotte (1774), which formally ended the war, saw Cornstalk and the Shawnee compelled by the British to recognize the Ohio River as their southern border—a boundary that had, in fact, been unilaterally established by the earlier Fort Stanwix treaty. By this treaty, the Shawnee were forced to cede all claims to their traditional "hunting grounds" in West Virginia and Kentucky south of the Ohio River. However, it is crucial to note that many other Shawnee leaders, fiercely independent and committed to their ancestral lands, steadfastly refused to recognize this imposed boundary, highlighting the decentralized nature of their governance and their enduring resolve.

American Revolution

The declaration of independence by the United States from the British Crown in 1776 plunged the North American continent into the tumultuous American Revolution. For the Shawnee, this period was characterized by deep internal divisions and complex strategic choices. They, as a nation, did not universally support the American rebel cause; indeed, many viewed the Americans as the primary aggressors. Chief Cornstalk notably led a minority faction who advocated for remaining neutral, hoping to spare his people further conflict. However, the prevailing sentiment among the Shawnee north of the Ohio River was one of profound discontent, fueled by the relentless American settlement of Kentucky. As historian Colin Calloway meticulously details, the majority of Shawnee communities ultimately allied themselves with the British against the nascent American forces, driven by the pragmatic hope that a British victory would lead to the expulsion of settlers from west of the Allegheny Mountains and a restoration of Indigenous control over their lands.

Prominent war leaders such as Blackfish and Blue Jacket joined forces with Dragging Canoe and a formidable band of Cherokee warriors who resided along the lower Tennessee River and Chickamauga Creek. Together, they waged a determined campaign against the encroaching colonists in that region. This particular group of Cherokee, due to their proximity to the river, were sometimes referred to by colonists as the Chickamauga. This designation, however, was a geographical one and, as Calloway clarifies, they were never a distinct, separate tribe, despite some contemporary accounts suggesting otherwise. Their resistance formed a significant part of what became known as the Cherokee–American wars, a series of brutal conflicts that spanned both during and after the formal conclusion of the American Revolution.

Following the cessation of hostilities in the American Revolution, and during the subsequent and equally brutal Northwest Indian War, the Shawnee forged a powerful alliance with the Miami. Together, they assembled a formidable fighting force in the Ohio Valley, spearheading a confederation of warriors from numerous Native American tribes in a concerted and desperate effort to repel U.S. settlers from the territory. This collective resistance, however, faced an insurmountable tide. After suffering a decisive defeat at the hands of U.S. forces at the Battle of Fallen Timbers in 1794, the majority of the Shawnee bands were compelled to sign the Treaty of Greenville the following year. Under its harsh terms, they were forced to cede vast portions of their ancestral homeland to the fledgling United States.

Yet, the spirit of resistance, or perhaps simply the will to survive on their own terms, persisted. Other Shawnee groups, refusing to acknowledge the legitimacy of this treaty, embarked on independent migrations. They journeyed westward across the Mississippi River into Missouri, establishing new settlements along Apple Creek. The French, ever present in the region, referred to their new home as Le Grand Village Sauvage, a name that, while colonial, inadvertently captured the enduring spirit of these unvanquished people.

Tecumseh's War and the War of 1812

The dawn of the 19th century witnessed the rise of one of the most iconic and tragic figures in Shawnee history: Tecumseh. This visionary Shawnee leader achieved widespread renown for his monumental efforts to organize his namesake confederacy, a grand alliance of Indigenous nations designed to fiercely oppose the relentless American expansion into Native American lands. The resulting protracted conflict, a desperate struggle for survival and sovereignty, became known as Tecumseh's War. It is a poignant historical footnote that the two principal adversaries in this defining conflict, Chief Tecumseh and General William Henry Harrison, had both been junior participants in the pivotal 1794 Battle of Fallen Timbers, setting the stage for their later, more consequential confrontation.

Tecumseh himself steadfastly refused to sign the humiliating 1795 Treaty of Greenville, recognizing its inherent injustice and the futility of appeasement. However, many other influential American Indian leaders in the region, exhausted by decades of warfare and facing overwhelming pressure, reluctantly accepted the terms of the Greenville treaty. For the ensuing decade, local intertribal resistance to American hegemony largely faded, a period of uneasy calm before the storm.

In September 1809, William Henry Harrison, then serving as the governor of the Indiana Territory (a man whose portrait as a Congressional delegate from the Northwest Territory in 1800 belied his later military ambitions), convened a meeting at Fort Wayne. He extended invitations to representatives from the Potawatomi, Lenape, Eel River people, and Miami nations. During these negotiations, Harrison, with characteristic colonial cunning, promised substantial subsidies to the tribes in exchange for their cession of vast tracts of land to the United States. After two weeks of intense, and no doubt coercive, negotiation, the Potawatomi leaders ultimately persuaded the Miami to accept the treaty. This was framed as an act of reciprocity, given that the Potawatomi had, in earlier instances, accepted treaties less favorable to their own interests at the Miami's request. Ultimately, on September 30, 1809, the tribes reluctantly signed the Treaty of Fort Wayne, thereby surrendering over 3,000,000 acres (12,000 km²) of land, primarily situated along the Wabash River north of Vincennes, Indiana. A transaction, one might muse, where "agreement" was less about consent and more about the absence of viable alternatives.

Tecumseh was, predictably, outraged by the Treaty of Fort Wayne. His vision, shared by earlier Indigenous leaders such as the Shawnee's own Blue Jacket and the Mohawk leader Joseph Brant, was rooted in the fundamental belief that American Indian land was not individual property to be bought and sold, but rather a communal heritage, owned in common by all tribes. In direct response to this perceived betrayal, Tecumseh began to vigorously expand upon the profound spiritual teachings of his younger brother, Tenskwatawa. Known widely as The Prophet, Tenskwatawa advocated for a powerful return to ancestral ways and a rejection of European-American influences. Tecumseh skillfully interwoven these spiritual precepts with the urgent need for a unified intertribal alliance, a pan-Indigenous front against colonial encroachment. He embarked on extensive travels, urging warriors across various nations to abandon accommodationist chiefs—those who sought compromise with the Americans—and instead to join the growing resistance movement centered at Prophetstown. In August 1810, Tecumseh dramatically led a contingent of 400 armed warriors to confront Harrison directly in Vincennes. There, he unequivocally demanded that Harrison nullify the Fort Wayne treaty, going so far as to threaten the lives of the chiefs who had signed it. Harrison, naturally, refused, asserting that the Miami were the rightful owners of the land and thus possessed the authority to sell it as they chose—a convenient interpretation of Indigenous land tenure. Tecumseh departed peacefully, but not without issuing a dire warning: he would seek an alliance with the British unless the treaty was rescinded, a threat that would soon prove prophetic.

Great Comet of 1811 and Tekoomsē

In March of 1811, a celestial event of immense significance captured the attention of both Indigenous peoples and European settlers: the appearance of the Great Comet of 1811, meticulously documented by observers like William Henry Smyth. Over the course of the ensuing year, tensions between American colonists and Native Americans escalated dramatically, reaching a fever pitch. Four settlers met violent ends along the Missouri River, and in a separate incident, Indigenous individuals seized a boatload of vital supplies from a group of traders. In response to these growing hostilities, Harrison summoned Tecumseh to Vincennes, demanding an explanation for the actions of his allies, as if Tecumseh held singular control over the diverse and autonomous nations within his burgeoning confederacy. In August 1811, the two leaders met once more, with Tecumseh endeavoring to reassure Harrison that the Shawnee intended to maintain peace with the United States.

Following this meeting, Tecumseh embarked on a critical mission, traveling extensively throughout the Southeast. His objective was to recruit powerful new allies against the United States from among the so-called "Five Civilized Tribes." It is worth noting that Tecumseh's name, Tekoomsē, held profound meaning, translating to "Shooting Star" or "Panther Across The Sky"—a name that resonated deeply with the celestial events unfolding.

Indeed, Tecumseh strategically informed the Choctaw, Chickasaw, Muscogee, and many other nations that the very comet that had blazed across the sky in March 1811 served as an undeniable harbinger of his arrival. He further declared that the people would soon witness an even more profound sign, irrefutable proof that the Great Spirit had personally dispatched him on this sacred mission.

As Tecumseh traversed the distant lands, both American and Indigenous forces meticulously prepared for what would become the fateful Battle of Tippecanoe. Harrison assembled a modest but determined force, comprising both army regulars and militia, with the express purpose of confronting the Native confederacy. On November 6, 1811, Harrison led this army, numbering approximately 1,000 men, to Prophetstown, Indiana, harboring the distinct hope of dispersing Tecumseh's alliance before it could fully solidify. However, in the early hours of the following morning, forces under the spiritual leadership of The Prophet launched a premature attack on Harrison's army near the Tippecanoe River, close to the Wabash River. Harrison successfully repulsed the attack, compelling the Indigenous forces to retreat and abandon Prophetstown. Harrison's men, in a punitive act, subsequently burned the village to the ground before returning home. The battle, while a tactical victory for Harrison, did little to diminish the underlying Indigenous resistance, merely shifting its focus.

New Madrid earthquake

Then, on December 11, 1811, a cataclysmic event of truly epic proportions unfolded: the New Madrid earthquake. This series of powerful tremors violently shook the ancestral lands of the Muscogee and reverberated across the vast expanse of the Midwestern United States, altering the landscape and inspiring profound awe and terror. While the interpretation of this seismic event varied from tribe to tribe, there was a universal consensus among Indigenous nations that such a powerful and unprecedented earthquake could only possess deep spiritual significance. The earthquake and its numerous, often terrifying, aftershocks served as a potent catalyst for Tecumseh's resistance movement. Many Muscogee and other Native American tribes became convinced that this was the very sign Tecumseh had prophesied, an undeniable manifestation of the Great Spirit's will, demanding their support for the Shawnee leader's cause. The earth itself, it seemed, was speaking.

As Roger L. Nichols succinctly describes the impact:

"The Indians were filled with great terror ... the trees and wigwams shook exceedingly; the ice which skirted the margin of the Arkansas river was broken into pieces; and most of the Indians thought that the Great Spirit, angry with the human race, was about to destroy the world."

This profound spiritual interpretation transformed a natural disaster into a powerful political and religious mandate, bolstering Tecumseh's confederacy in ways that mere human diplomacy could not.

Tribal involvement in the War of 1812

The New Madrid earthquake, interpreted by the Muscogee as a divine imperative, solidified their resolve to support the burgeoning Shawnee resistance led by Tecumseh. This alliance was particularly embraced by the more conservative and traditional elements within the Muscogee nation, specifically those residing in the Upper Towns, whose communities were more geographically isolated from the pervasive influence of European-American settlements. These groups, fiercely committed to preserving their ancestral ways, harbored no desire for assimilation into the encroaching colonial culture. They became known as the Red Sticks, a name that would become synonymous with their fervent resistance. The Red Sticks rose in opposition to the Lower Creek, who were often more amenable to American influence, plunging the Muscogee into a devastating civil war, grimly known as the Creek War. This internal conflict, driven by fundamental disagreements over land, sovereignty, and cultural identity, ultimately became an integral, bloody component of the larger War of 1812 when open hostilities erupted between American soldiers and the Red Sticks faction of the Creek.

The stark ideological divide among Indigenous leaders during this period is vividly illustrated by the contrasting viewpoints of the Choctaw chief Pushmataha and Tecumseh. Pushmataha, in 1811, articulated a policy of cautious cooperation with the Americans, stating:

"These white Americans ... give us fair exchange, their cloth, their guns, their tools, implements, and other things which the Choctaws need but do not make ... They doctored our sick; they clothed our suffering; they fed our hungry ... So in marked contrast with the experience of the Shawnees, it will be seen that the whites and Indians in this section are living on friendly and mutually beneficial terms."

This perspective, shared by some leaders, reflected a pragmatic attempt to secure benefits and maintain peace through accommodation, highlighting the varied strategies Indigenous nations employed for survival.

Tecumseh, however, offered a chillingly prescient counter-argument, a lament and a warning that resonates with profound historical weight:

"Where today are the Pequot? Where are the Narragansett, the Mohican, the Pocanet and other powerful tribes of our people? They have vanished before the avarice and oppression of the white man, as snow before the summer sun ... Sleep not longer, O Choctaws and Chickasaws ... Will not the bones of our dead be plowed up, and their graves turned into plowed fields?"

This powerful rhetoric, recorded by William Tecumseh Sherman and Frederick Turner III, underscored the existential threat faced by all Indigenous nations and served as a rallying cry for unity against the relentless tide of American expansion, a call to remember the fate of those who had already fallen.

Following William Hull's infamous surrender of Detroit to the British during the early stages of the War of 1812, General William Henry Harrison was entrusted with the command of the U.S. Army of the Northwest. His immediate objective was to retake the strategically vital city, which was then defended by the British Colonel Henry Procter, working in close alliance with Tecumseh and his formidable Indigenous forces. However, a detachment of Harrison's army suffered a significant defeat at Frenchtown along the River Raisin on January 22, 1813. While some prisoners were taken to Detroit, Procter, with a callous disregard for human life, left those too severely injured to travel with an utterly inadequate guard. His Native American allies, enraged and likely seeking retribution for past injustices, subsequently attacked and massacred perhaps as many as 60 wounded Americans, many of whom were Kentucky militiamen. The Americans, predictably, branded this horrific incident the "River Raisin Massacre." This devastating defeat not only brought Harrison's campaign against Detroit to a grinding halt but also gave rise to a powerful and enduring rallying cry for the Americans: "Remember the River Raisin!"

In May 1813, Procter and Tecumseh jointly launched a siege against Fort Meigs in northern Ohio. During the siege, Indigenous forces successfully ambushed and defeated American reinforcements attempting to relieve the fort. Despite this victory, the resilient garrison within Fort Meigs held out, refusing to surrender. As the siege dragged on, many of the Indigenous warriors, operating under their own customs and commitments, gradually began to disperse, compelling Procter and Tecumseh to reluctantly withdraw back to Canada. Their second offensive in July, a renewed attempt against Fort Meigs, also met with failure. In an effort to bolster flagging Indigenous morale, Procter and Tecumseh next attempted to storm Fort Stephenson, a smaller, less formidable American outpost situated on the Sandusky River. However, they were repulsed with serious losses, a bitter defeat that effectively ended the British and Tecumseh's Ohio campaign.

A decisive turning point in the war came on Lake Erie. On September 10, 1813, the American commander, Captain Oliver Hazard Perry, engaged the British fleet in the pivotal Battle of Lake Erie. Perry's resounding victory against the British not only secured American control of the vital lake but also significantly boosted American morale, which had been battered by a series of earlier defeats. This strategic triumph effectively compelled the British to fall back from Detroit. Seizing this momentum, General Harrison launched another invasion of Upper Canada (now Ontario), a campaign that culminated in a decisive U.S. victory at the Battle of the Thames on October 5, 1813.

It was at the Battle of the Thames that Tecumseh, the brilliant Shawnee leader and architect of the pan-Indigenous confederacy, was tragically killed. His death, a profound loss, effectively shattered the Indigenous alliance with the British in the Detroit region. With American control of Lake Erie firmly established, the British could no longer provide essential military supplies to their Native allies, who, facing overwhelming odds and lacking crucial support, gradually withdrew from the war. The Americans, having achieved strategic dominance, maintained control of the area for the remainder of the conflict. The war had effectively broken the back of organized Indigenous resistance in the region, leaving a legacy of displacement and despair.

Aftermath

The immediate aftermath of the War of 1812 and the death of Tecumseh initiated a new, bleak chapter of forced migrations and the further fragmentation of the Shawnee people. The Shawnee who had settled in Missouri, facing renewed pressure from the expanding United States, made the difficult decision to migrate south into Mexico, specifically to the eastern part of Spanish Texas. These groups would eventually become known as the "Absentee Shawnee." They were joined in this southward migration by some of their close allies, the Delaware (Lenape), further cementing their shared destinies. Although these Shawnee were closely allied with the Cherokee led by The Bowl, their own chief, John Linney, maintained a precarious neutrality during the 1839 Cherokee War, a decision that would ironically serve them well later.

As Texas achieved independence from Mexico under American leadership, the new republic, driven by expansionist ambitions, resolved to force the removal of the Shawnee from its territory. However, in a rare act of recognition and perhaps pragmatic appreciation for their earlier neutrality, Texan President Mirabeau Lamar ensured that the Shawnee were fully compensated for their improvements to the land and their cultivated crops. Despite this small concession, they were nonetheless forcibly moved to the Arkansas Territory. These Shawnee eventually settled close to the modern-day city of Shawnee, Oklahoma. They were subsequently joined by other Shawnee groups who had been pushed out of Kansas (a story detailed below), sharing their steadfast traditionalist views and beliefs, creating a new, albeit displaced, community.

Meanwhile, back in the Ohio Country, the Ohio Shawnee had, in 1817, signed the Treaty of Fort Meigs. Under its terms, they were compelled to cede their remaining ancestral lands in exchange for three designated reservations: one in Wapaughkonetta, another at Hog Creek (situated near Lima), and a third in Lewistown, Ohio. These lands were to be shared with some Seneca people who had migrated west from New York, another Indigenous nation facing similar pressures.

Through a series of subsequent treaties, including the significant Treaty of Lewistown of 1825, the Shawnee and Seneca peoples reluctantly agreed to exchange their lands in western Ohio with the United States for new territories west of the Mississippi River. These lands would eventually comprise parts of what became Indian Territory. In July 1831, the Lewistown group of Seneca–Shawnee began their arduous journey to the Indian Territory, their destination ultimately being parts of present-day Kansas and Oklahoma.

The main body of Shawnee remaining in Ohio followed the leadership of Black Hoof, a respected chief who had fiercely resisted every attempt to compel his people to relinquish their ancestral homeland. Black Hoof steadfastly believed that his people needed to adapt to European-American culture to survive, but not at the cost of their land. After Black Hoof's death, the remaining 400 Ohio Shawnee at Wapaughkonetta and Hog Creek finally surrendered their lands. They were subsequently moved to the Shawnee Reserve in Kansas, a relocation largely negotiated under the terms brokered by Joseph Parks (1793–1859). Parks, a significant figure of the era, had been raised in the household of Lewis Cass and served as a leading interpreter for the Shawnee, navigating the treacherous linguistic and cultural divides.

As Missouri officially joined the Union in 1821, the pressure on Indigenous populations within its borders intensified. Following the Treaty of St. Louis in 1825, the approximately 1,400 Missouri Shawnee were forcibly relocated from Cape Girardeau, a settlement along the west bank of the Mississippi River, to southeastern Kansas, where they were settled close to the Neosho River.

During the year 1833, only Black Bob's band of Shawnee managed to resist immediate removal. They established new settlements in northeastern Kansas, near modern-day Olathe, and along the Kansas (Kaw) River in Monticello, close to Gum Springs. The Shawnee Methodist Mission was subsequently constructed nearby, its stated purpose being to minister to the spiritual and educational needs of the tribe, a common, if often culturally disruptive, practice of the time. Approximately 200 of the Ohio Shawnee, followers of the prophet Tenskwatawa, had already joined their Kansas kin here in 1826, seeking common ground and shared spiritual purpose.

In the mid-1830s, a peculiar chapter in Shawnee history unfolded: two companies of Shawnee soldiers were recruited into United States service to fight in the Seminole War in Florida. One of these companies was notably led by Joseph Parks, the same individual who had earlier played a crucial role in negotiating the cession treaty. Parks was commissioned as a captain, demonstrating his continued influence and adaptability within the American system. He was a significant landholder in both Westport, Missouri, and Shawnee, Kansas, and was also a Freemason and an active member of the Methodist Episcopal Church, embodying a complex blend of Indigenous and American identities. In Shawnee, Kansas, a Shawnee cemetery was established in the 1830s and remained in active use until the 1870s, serving as a silent chronicle of the community's presence and struggles. Joseph Parks, a man who walked between worlds, was among the most prominent individuals interred there.

In 1853, the United States Congress, through the Indian Appropriations Bill, allocated a sum of $64,366 to fulfill treaty obligations to the Shawnee. This funding was intended for annuities, educational provisions, and other essential services, a tangible, if often insufficient, acknowledgment of their treaty rights. An additional sum of$2,000 was appropriated for the Seneca and Shawnee jointly, reflecting their shared historical and geographical entanglements.

The tumultuous years of the American Civil War (1861–1865) brought further upheaval. Black Bob's band, seeking refuge from the internecine conflict raging in Kansas, fled south and joined the "Absentee Shawnee" in Indian Territory. After the war's conclusion, the Shawnee remaining in Kansas faced yet another expulsion, being forcibly moved to northeastern Oklahoma. The Shawnee members of the former Lewistown group subsequently became known as the "Eastern Shawnee," distinguishing themselves by their historical origins.

The Shawnee who had resided in Kansas became known as the "Loyal Shawnee." The origin of this appellation is debated: some suggest it stemmed from their allegiance with the Union during the Civil War, while others contend it was because they were the very last group to leave their beloved Ohio homelands. This latter group, the Loyal Shawnee, appeared to be regarded by the United States as an integral part of the Cherokee Nation, a classification that would later prove contentious. They were also frequently referred to as the "Cherokee Shawnee" and were ultimately settled on a portion of the Cherokee land within Indian Territory. This forced integration, while offering some stability, also blurred their distinct identity.

In a modern testament to their enduring heritage and connection to their ancestral lands, a significant cultural milestone occurred on June 7, 2024. On the historic site of the Shawnee town "Old Chillicothe," located along U.S. 68 in Xenia Township, Greene County, Ohio, the Great Council State Park was officially opened. This important initiative was brought to fruition with the collaborative efforts of the three federally recognized Shawnee tribes: the Shawnee Tribe, the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma, and the Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma. It stands as a powerful symbol of their continued presence and cultural resurgence in a land from which they were once forcibly removed.

Federal recognition

In the twilight of the 20th century, the "Loyal" or "Cherokee" Shawnee, having endured decades under the administrative umbrella of the Cherokee Nation, embarked on a determined movement to achieve federal recognition as a distinct and independent tribe. This arduous process, a quest for self-determination and the affirmation of their unique identity, culminated in a successful Congressional bill. As a result, they are now formally recognized as the "Shawnee Tribe," a sovereign nation in their own right. Today, the vast majority of the enrolled members of all three federally recognized Shawnee tribes—the Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma, the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma, and the Shawnee Tribe—reside primarily in Oklahoma, a testament to the enduring legacy of forced removals and the establishment of new homelands.

The three federally recognized Shawnee tribes, each with its unique history and composition, are:

• The Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma
• The Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma
• The Shawnee Tribe

Social and kinship groups

Prior to the profound disruptions brought about by contact with European cultures, the Shawnee tribe operated under a patrilineal system. This meant that descent and inheritance, including status and property, were traced exclusively through the paternal lines. This organizational structure stands in notable contrast to many other Native American tribes, a significant number of which adhered to matrilineal kinship systems. In a matrilineal system, children are considered born into their mother's family and clan, and inheritance and property typically pass through the female line, highlighting a fundamental difference in social organization.

According to the observations of mid-19th century historian Henry Harvey, the Shawnee were traditionally governed by leaders whom they referred to as sachema or [sachems]. These leaders, Harvey noted, reigned by a system of succession that, somewhat paradoxically given the patrilineal emphasis, followed a matrilineal line for the office itself. For instance, the sons of a reigning king would not inherit the position directly. Instead, the leadership would pass to the sons of his brother, through the maternal line, or to the sons of his sister (and, subsequently, to the sons of her daughter). This intricate system, while ensuring continuity, also underscored the importance of the female line in determining legitimate succession. Harvey theorized that the Shawnee relied on this particular system of descent precisely because a woman's sons would always be considered legitimate, thereby ensuring clarity and stability in leadership transitions. A system, it seems, designed to prevent messy arguments over paternity, a foresight one might almost admire.

The Shawnee tribe was traditionally organized into five distinct divisions, often referred to as septs. Each division held its own unique identity, historical narrative, and, in some cases, specific ceremonial roles within the broader Shawnee confederacy. These divisions were commonly known by the following names:

• Chillicothe (Principal Place), also rendered as Chalahgawtha, Chalaka, or Chalakatha. This was considered the principal division, and tradition holds it was appointed by the first Lead Illini or man Kwikullay.
• Hathawekela, or Thawikila;
• Kispoko, also known as Kispokotha, Kishpoko, or Kishpokotha. The name is sometimes linked to ishpoko, akin to the Ispogi, meaning "swamps" or "marshy lands" of the Muscogee, particularly the Tukabatchi. This geographical association might hint at their traditional territories or characteristics.
• Mekoche, variously spelled Mequachake, Machachee, Maguck, or Mackachack; often simply Mackochee.
• Pekowi, also Pekuwe, Piqua, or Pekowitha; sometimes referred to as Pickywanni or Pickquay.

Within this structure, the critical role of war chiefs was also hereditary, with their lineage descending through the maternal line within the Kispoko division. This specialized role highlights the military prowess and strategic importance traditionally associated with this particular sept.

A significant study conducted in 1935 by C.F. and E.W. Voegelin provided further insights into Shawnee social organization. It noted that in addition to the five septs or divisions, the Shawnee were also intricately divided among six distinct clans or subdivisions, based on kinship. Each of these clans was understood to represent specific spiritual values and was assigned a recognized, often ceremonial, role within the overarching confederacy. Crucially, each name group or clan could be found represented within each of the five divisions, meaning every Shawnee individual belonged to both a division and a clan or name group, creating a complex, interwoven social fabric.

The six principal group names, or clans, were:

• Pellewomhsoomi (Turkey name group)—This clan symbolically represents bird life, connecting its members to the avian world and its associated spiritual qualities.
• Kkahkileewomhsoomi (Turtle name group)—This clan embodies aquatic life, drawing spiritual significance from the turtle, a creature often associated with longevity, wisdom, and the earth itself in many Indigenous cosmologies.
• Petekoθiteewomhsoomi (Rounded-feet name group)—This clan represents carnivorous animals characterized by their rounded, powerful paws, such as the dog, wolf, or bear. It signifies attributes like strength, hunting prowess, and protection.
• Mseewiwomhsoomi (Horse name group)—This clan is associated with herbivorous animals, particularly the horse and deer, symbolizing grace, speed, and a connection to the natural world's gentle giants.
• θepatiiwomhsoomi (Raccoon name group)—This clan represents animals possessing paws capable of ripping and tearing, such as the raccoon and bear, suggesting adaptability, resourcefulness, and perhaps a certain tenacity.
• Petakineeθiiwomhsoomi (Rabbit name group)—This clan uniquely represents a gentle and peaceful nature, often serving as a counterpoint or balance within the social structure, emphasizing harmony and non-aggression.

Each sept or division traditionally maintained a primary village, which served as the residence of the division's chief. These villages were typically named after their respective divisions, solidifying their identity. By deeply ingrained tradition, each Shawnee division and clan had specific, often ceremonial, roles that it performed on behalf of the entire tribe, contributing to the collective well-being and spiritual balance. However, by the time these intricate kinship elements were meticulously recorded in writing by European Americans, many of these strong social traditions were already in decline, weakened by centuries of dispersal, conflict, and cultural disruption. Consequently, their full scope and nuanced meanings are, regrettably, still poorly understood, leaving gaps in our knowledge of this once vibrant social order. The constant forced migration and scattering of the Shawnee people from the 17th through the 19th centuries inevitably led to significant changes in the roles and functions of these divisions, further complicating their study.

Today, as previously noted, the United States government formally recognizes three distinct Shawnee tribes, all of which are primarily located in Oklahoma. These contemporary tribal entities largely reflect the historical divisions, though not always in a perfectly isolated manner:

• The Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma, which predominantly consists of descendants from the Hathawekela, Kispokotha, and Pekuwe divisions.
• The Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma, primarily composed of individuals from the Mekoche division.
• The Shawnee Tribe, which was formerly considered part of the Cherokee Nation, largely comprises descendants from the Chaalakatha (Chillicothe) and Mekoche divisions. Interestingly, the Petakineeθiiwomhsoomi (Rabbit name group) is often seen as a distinct, foundational element, representing a gentle and peaceful nature that stands alone as the "Tail" or last, a symbolic anchor.

As of 2008, the total enrolled population of Shawnee individuals stood at 7,584, with the majority of these members residing within the state of Oklahoma, continuing their legacy in their modern homelands.

State-recognized tribe

Beyond the federally recognized entities, the landscape of Indigenous recognition in the United States includes organizations that receive acknowledgment at the state level. In the state of Alabama, one such organization, the Piqua Shawnee Tribe, holds the status of a state-recognized tribe under the provisions of the Davis-Strong Act. This form of recognition, while conferring certain benefits and formal acknowledgment within state jurisdiction, differs significantly from federal recognition, which carries a distinct set of rights, responsibilities, and government-to-government relations. It is worth noting that Ohio, a state central to much of Shawnee history, does not formally recognize any Shawnee tribes, nor does it maintain a mechanism for recognizing any other state-recognized tribes. Similarly, Kentucky, another state with deep historical ties to the Shawnee, also lacks any formal process for state-recognizing tribes. The patchwork nature of tribal recognition across states often creates confusion and can lead to vastly different outcomes for Indigenous communities.

Unrecognized groups who claim Shawnee descent

The issue of unrecognized groups claiming Indigenous descent is a complex and often contentious matter within Native American communities. For a broader understanding of this phenomenon, it is useful to consult the List of organizations that self-identify as Native American tribes.

It is crucial to differentiate between these self-identifying organizations and the formally recognized tribal entities. Dozens of unrecognized organizations across the United States assert claims of Shawnee ancestry. However, these organizations are distinct from, and not to be confused with, federally recognized tribes nor state-recognized tribes in states like Alabama that have such mechanisms. The distinction is not merely administrative; it often carries profound cultural, political, and economic implications.

The Absentee Shawnee Tribal Historic Preservation Office's Cultural Preservation Department has articulated significant concerns regarding these unrecognized groups. In their November 2010 newsletter, The Absentee Shawnee News, they stated:

"in our ancestral settlement areas including but not limited to Ohio, Kentucky, West Virginia, Indiana, [and] Alabama. In these areas, there are a number of people who claim Shawnee ancestry, this is not so much the concern as the fact that some of these individuals or groups use this claim to exploit Shawnee culture as a means of gaining opportunities for themselves from a public that is largely unaware of the vast divide that separates our tribal community politically and culturally from those of alleged Shawnee ancestry."

This statement highlights a critical issue: the appropriation and commodification of Indigenous culture by groups without legitimate tribal connections, often for personal gain or perceived legitimacy, which can severely undermine the efforts of genuine tribal nations.

Ben Barnes, the chief of the Shawnee Tribe, has also voiced strong concerns, asserting: "Groups claiming to be tribal sovereigns has reached a new level of concern for the Shawnee Tribe and other tribal nations." He further elaborated on the detrimental impact of these groups:

"There are currently 36 unestablished Shawnee “tribes” operating as 501(c)(3) non-profits across the country. Their 501(c)(3) designations allow them to solicit donations and participate in grants meant for Tribal nations. They pose as spokespeople for our ancestors at historic sites, state historical societies, and university campuses causing significant harm to our identity, culture, and reputation. These groups are violating the sacred, ancient places of our ancestors. They perform their ideas of our ceremonies on top of our burial mounds and have stolen our language, customs, and ceremonies."

This is a stark indictment, detailing the profound cultural and economic damage inflicted by these unrecognized entities, whose actions, in the eyes of federally recognized tribes, represent a form of cultural theft and misrepresentation, undermining centuries of genuine heritage and struggle.

One notable example of a self-identifying group is the United Remnant Band of the Shawnee Nation, headquartered in Bellefontaine, Ohio. In 1979 and 1980, the Ohio state legislature held hearings to consider state recognition for this band. The group submitted extensive historical and genealogical documents, endeavoring to support their claim of direct descent from the historical Shawnee people. The Ohio General Assembly conducted hearings, receiving testimony from numerous groups regarding the recognition. In 1980, the 113th Ohio General Assembly passed a "Joint Resolution to recognize the Shawnee Nation United Remnant Band" (Am. Sub. H.J.R. No. 8, 1979–1980). However, the legal weight of this resolution is limited. As Leo Jennings, a spokesperson for the Ohio attorney general's office, clarified, "The resolution has no force of law in the state Ohio.… It was basically a ceremonial resolution." This distinction is critical: a ceremonial resolution offers symbolic acknowledgment but confers none of the sovereign rights or federal protections associated with official tribal recognition, leaving the "tribal question" in Ohio a deeply complicated matter.

Notable historic Shawnee

The history of the Shawnee is punctuated by the lives and legacies of remarkable individuals whose actions shaped their people's destiny and left an indelible mark on the broader North American narrative. These figures, through their leadership, diplomacy, and unwavering resistance, embodied the spirit of the Shawnee. It's worth noting that Shawnee people from the 20th and 21st centuries are typically listed under their specific, federally recognized tribes, reflecting the modern organizational structure.

• Big Hominy (Meshemethequater, 1690–1758): A highly respected warrior and diplomat, Big Hominy was renowned for his pivotal role in numerous peace conferences. His strategic interventions often prevented full-scale warfare between encroaching English settlers and the Shawnees, demonstrating a commitment to difficult, yet necessary, diplomacy.
• Black Bob (Wawahchepaehai or Wawahchepaekar): A significant 19th-century leader and war chief in Ohio, Black Bob's band was one of the last to resist removal from their lands in Kansas, eventually seeking refuge with the Absentee Shawnee during the tumultuous American Civil War.
• Black Hoof (Catahecassa, 1740–1831): A revered Shawnee chief, Black Hoof was a pragmatist who firmly believed his people needed to adapt to certain aspects of European-American culture to ensure their survival. Despite advocating for adaptation, he vehemently resisted efforts to force his people from their ancestral lands.
• Black Snake (Peteusha) and Big Snake (Shemanetoo): These two prominent figures were active participants in major conflicts of their era, including Lord Dunmore's War, the American Revolutionary War, and the subsequent Northwest Indian War, demonstrating a consistent presence in the defense of Shawnee interests.
• Blackfish (Chiungalla, 1729–1779): A powerful Shawnee chief of the Chillicothe division, Blackfish is perhaps best known for his leadership during the American Revolutionary War and his interactions with Daniel Boone.
• Blue Jacket (Waweyapiersenwaw, "Blue Jacket", 1743–1810): A formidable war leader during the Northwest Indian War, Blue Jacket was an important early supporter and ideological precursor to Tecumseh's vision of a pan-Indigenous confederacy, advocating for the communal ownership of land.
• Peter Chartier (Wacanackshina, "White One Who Reclines", 1690–1759): A significant French-Canadian/Shawnee Métis trader, Peter Chartier was a vocal opponent of the destructive sale of alcohol in Shawnee communities. He ultimately sided with the French during the French and Indian War, seeking to protect his people's interests against British encroachment.
• Chiksika (Chiuxca, "Black Stump", 1760–1792): A respected Kispoko war chief, Chiksika was the older brother and an early mentor to the legendary Tecumseh, playing a crucial role in his formative years as a warrior.
• Cornstalk (Hokolesqua, 1720–1777): A prominent chief who led the Shawnee during Lord Dunmore's War, Cornstalk was a complex figure who sought peace but was ultimately murdered under a flag of truce, a tragic symbol of colonial perfidy.
• George Drouillard (1773–1810): A skilled French-Canadian/Shawnee hunter, interpreter, and scout, George Drouillard served with distinction on the monumental Lewis and Clark Expedition, providing invaluable expertise in navigating the western territories and interacting with Indigenous nations.
• Kakowatcheky (d. ca. 1755): A significant and influential Shawnee chief whose leadership played a role in the complex diplomatic and military landscape of the mid-18th century.
• Kekewepelethy ("Captain Johnny", d. c. 1808): He served as the principal civil chief of the Shawnees in the Ohio Country during the turbulent Northwest Indian War, navigating his people through a period of intense conflict and loss.
• Captain Logan (Spemica Lawba, "High Horn", c. 1776–1812): A noted scout and interpreter who, despite his Shawnee heritage, served on the American side during the War of 1812, a complex example of shifting allegiances and individual choices in a time of profound upheaval.
• Neucheconeh (d. ca. 1748): A chief of the western Pennsylvania Shawnee, Neucheconeh was a vocal and active campaigner against the unrestricted sale and devastating effects of alcohol in Shawnee communities, recognizing its corrosive impact.
• Nonhelema (1720–1786): The formidable sister of Chief Cornstalk, Nonhelema was a respected leader in her own right. She notably contributed to the monumental task of compiling a dictionary for the Shawnee language, preserving a vital aspect of their culture.
• Opessa Straight Tail (Wapatha, 1664–1750): As chief of the Pekowi band, Opessa Straight Tail signed several significant peace treaties with William Penn before ultimately leading his people to the Ohio River Valley around 1727, seeking new opportunities and perhaps greater autonomy.
• Tecumseh (c. 1768–1813): The legendary Shawnee leader, whose name still evokes powerful images of resistance and unity. With his spiritual brother Tenskwatawa, Tecumseh masterminded a monumental attempt to unite Indigenous tribes west of the Appalachian Mountains against the relentless expansion of European-American settlement, a vision that, though ultimately unsuccessful, left an enduring legacy of Indigenous sovereignty.
• Tenskwatawa ("The Open Door", 1775–1836): Known as The Shawnee Prophet, Tenskwatawa was the charismatic spiritual leader and younger brother of Tecumseh. His powerful religious teachings, which called for a return to traditional ways and a rejection of American influences, provided the crucial ideological foundation for Tecumseh's political and military confederacy.

---

See also

• Battle of Tippecanoe Outdoor Drama

Notes

• ^ [1] [a] [b] Oklahoma Indian Affairs Commission. Oklahoma Indian Nations Pocket Pictorial. Archived February 11, 2009, at the Wayback Machine. 2008.
• ^ [2] [a] [b] [c] [d] Callender, "Shawnee," 623.
• ^ [3] "Algonquian, Algic". Ethnologue. Retrieved October 5, 2021.
• ^ [4] Callender, "Shawnee," 623–24.
• ^ [5] [a] [b] [c] Mahr, August C. (May 1960). "Shawnee Names and Migrations in Kentucky and West Virginia" (PDF). The Ohio Journal of Science. 60 (3): 155–158.
• ^ [6] Faden, William (January 1, 1793), The United States of North America, with the British territories and those of Spain: according to the treaty of 1784, Charing Cross: Published as the act directs Feby. 11 1793 by Willm. Faden, Geographer to the King, retrieved December 18, 2024
• ^ [7] Voegelin, Carl F. 1938–40. "Shawnee Stems and the Jacob P. Dunn Miami Dictionary." Indiana Historical Society Prehistory Research Series Volume 1, No. 8, Part III, p. 318 (October 1939). Indianapolis.
• ^ [8] "Shawnee Myth. Story of a Year. Old Sawage and her Grandson." MS 3906, Smithsonian Institution National Anthropological Archives. Myth collected by Jeremiah Curtin. 1850s–1880s.
• ^ [9] C. F. Voegelin, fieldwork notebook XII, "Big Sacred Lizard"; fieldwork 1933–34.
• ^ [10] Transcribed by Bruno Neti about 1951 from Shawnee Song cylinders collected by C. F. Voegelin and now in the Archives of Traditional Music at Indiana University. Sheet 8, Song 38.
• ^ [11] "maalaakwahi ke'neemepe: Shawnee Language Immersion Program (SLIP)". shawnee-nsn.gov. April 6, 2023. Retrieved July 7, 2023.
• ^ [12] "Shawnee Language Collection". Sam Noble Museum. December 18, 2017. Retrieved July 7, 2023.
• ^ [13] "Shawnee language, alphabet and pronunciation". omniglot.com. Retrieved July 7, 2023.
• ^ [14] "Shawnee". Ethnologue. Retrieved April 28, 2016.
• ^ [15] O'Donnell, James H. Ohio's First Peoples, p. 31. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press, 2004. ISBN 0-8214-1525-5 (paperback), ISBN 0-8214-1524-7 (hardcover)
• ^ [16] Howard, James H. Shawnee!: The Ceremonialism of a Native Indian Tribe and its Cultural Background, p. 1. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press, 1981. ISBN 0-8214-0417-2, 0-8214-0614-0
• ^ [17] Schutz, Noel W., Jr.: The Study of Shawnee Myth in an Ethnographic and Ethnohistorical Perspective, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Indiana University, 1975.
• ^ [18] [a] [b] "Fort Ancient Earthworks". Ohio History Central. Retrieved July 7, 2023.
• ^ [19] "Fort Ancient". ancientohiotrail.org. Retrieved July 7, 2023.
• ^ [20] [a] [b] Peregrine, Peter Neal; Ember, Melvin, eds. (2003). "Encyclopedia of Prehistory: Volume 6: North America". Encyclopedia of Prehistory. Vol. 6 : North America. Springer Publishing. pp. 175–184. ISBN 0-306-46260-5.
• ^ [21] Drooker, Penelope B. (1997). The View from Madisonville: Protohistoric Western Fort Ancient Interaction Patterns. University of Michigan Press. p. 203. ISBN 978-0915703425.
• ^ [22] Clark, Jerry. "Shawnees". Tennessee Encyclopedia of Culture and History. Retrieved September 11, 2008.
• ^ [23] Charles Augustus Hanna, The Wilderness Trail: Or, The Ventures and Adventures of the Pennsylvania Traders on the Allegheny Path, Volume 1, New York: Putnam's sons, 1911, esp. chap. IV, "The Shawnees", pp. 119–160.
• ^ [24] [a] [b] [c] Kleber, John E. (1992). The Kentucky Encyclopedia. University Press of Kentucky. p. 815. ISBN 978-0-8131-2883-2. Retrieved February 17, 2013.
• ^ [25] Carrie Hunter Willis and Etta Belle Walker, Legends of the Skyline Drive and the Great Valley of Virginia, 1937, pp. 15–16; this account also appears in T.K. Cartmell's 1909 Shenandoah Valley Pioneers and Their Descendants p. 41.
• ^ [26] Edward Bland, The Discoverie of New Brittaine
• ^ [27] McWilliams, Richebourg; Iberville, Pierre (1991). Iberville's Gulf Journals. University of Alabama Press. p. 175. ISBN 978-0817305390.
• ^ [28] Jerry E. Clark, The Shawnee, University Press of Kentucky, 1977. ISBN 0813128188
• ^ [29] Gallay, Alan. The Indian Slave Trade: The Rise of the English Empire in the American South, 1670–1717, p. 55. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002. ISBN 0-300-10193-7
• ^ [30] Not to be confused with the nearby French Margaret's Town; see John Franklin Meginness, Otzinachson: A History of the West Branch Valley of the Susquehanna (rev. ed., Williamsport, PA, 1889), 1:94. Ostonwakin is also spelled Otstonwakin.
• ^ [31] Stephen Warren, Worlds the Shawnees Made: Migration and Violence in Early America, UNC Press Books, 2014 ISBN 1469611732
• ^ [32] Legends of the Skyline Drive and the Great Valley of Virginia, pp. 16–17.
• ^ [33] Joseph Doddridge, 1850, A History of the Valley of Virginia, p. 44
• ^ [34] Calloway, Colin (2007). The Shawnees and the War for America. New York: Viking. p. 13. ISBN 978-0-670-03862-6.
• ^ [35] Library of Congress, Transcript of the Journal of Nicholas Cresswell
• ^ [36] Gevinson, Alan. "Which Native American Tribes Allied Themselves with the French?" Teachinghistory.org, accessed September 23, 2011.
• ^ [37] [a] [b] Colin G. Calloway, "'We Have Always Been the Frontier': The American Revolution in Shawnee Country," American Indian Quarterly (1992) 16#1 pp 39–52. in JSTOR
• ^ [38] [a] [b] Owens, Robert M. (2007). Mr. Jefferson's Hammer: William Henry Harrison and the Origins of American Indian Policy. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press. pp. 201–03. ISBN 978-0-8061-3842-8.
• ^ [39] [a] [b] Owens, p. 212
• ^ [40] Langguth, p. 164
• ^ [41] Langguth, p. 165
• ^ [42] [a] [b] Langguth, p. 166
• ^ [43] George Blanchard, Governor of the Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma, so describes the meaning of the name in the PBS documentary We Shall Remain: Tecumseh's Vision Archived May 4, 2012, at the Wayback Machine:

  Well, I've always heard 'Teh-cum-theh'—'Teh-cum-theh'—means, in our culture and our belief, at nights when we see a falling star, it means that this panther is jumping from one mountain to another. And as kids, we saw these falling stars, we'd kind of hesitate about being out in the dark, because we thought there were actually panthers out there walking around. So that's what his name meant: Teh-cum-theh.

• ^ [44] Langguth, p. 168
• ^ [45] Funk, Arville (1983) [1969]. A Sketchbook of Indiana History. Rochester, Indiana: Christian Book Press.
• ^ [46] Langguth, p. 169
• ^ [47] Langguth, p. 167
• ^ [48] Jones, Charile (November 1987). "Sharing Choctaw History". Bishinik. Retrieved October 1, 2013.
• ^ [49] Sherman, William Tecumseh. "H.B. Cushman, History of the Choctaw, Chickasaw and Natchez Indians (Greenville, Texas: 1899), 310 ff., quoted in "Survival Strategies"" . Digital History. University of Houston. Retrieved April 28, 2016.
• ^ [50] Turner III, Frederick (1978) [1973]. "Poetry and Oratory". The Portable North American Indian Reader. Penguin Book. pp. 246–247. ISBN 0-14-015077-3.
• ^ [51] "Kentucky: National Guard History eMuseum – War of 1812". Kynghistory.ky.gov. Archived from the original on March 2, 2009. Retrieved October 22, 2008.
• ^ [52] [a] [b] Lipscomb, Carol A.: Shawnee Indians from the Handbook of Texas Online. Retrieved February 21, 2010.
• ^ [53] "Treaty with the Shawnee, 1825, Article 5, Page 264". Oklahoma State University. November 7, 1825. Retrieved May 8, 2020.
• ^ [54] [a] [b] Society, Kansas State Historical (March 27, 2019). Collections of the Kansas State Historical Society. The Kansas State Historical Society. p. 399 – via Internet Archive. Joseph Parks Shawnee.
• ^ [55] "Indian Appropriation" (PDF). The New York Times. March 15, 1853. p. 3.
• ^ [56] Ohio Department of National Resources website 6/10/2024
• ^ [57] "Text of S. 3019 (106th): Shawnee Tribe Status Act of 2000 (Introduced version)". GovTrack.us. Civic Impulse. September 7, 2000. Retrieved May 8, 2020.
• ^ [58] Harvey, Henry (1855). History of the Shawnee Indians: From the Year 1681 to 1854, Inclusive. Cincinnati: Ephraim Morgan & Sons. p. 18.
• ^ [59] Harvey, Henry (1855). "1". History of the Shawnee Indians: From the Year 1681 to 1854, Inclusive. Cincinnati: Ephraim Morgan & Sons. p. 18.
• ^ [60] [a] [b] [c] Voegellin, C.F.; Voegelin, E. W. (1935). "Shawnee Name Groups". American Anthropologist. 37 (4): 617–635. doi:10.1525/aa.1935.37.4.02a00070.
• ^ [61] Oklahoma Indian Commission. Oklahoma Indian Nations Pocket Pictorial. Archived February 11, 2009, at the Wayback Machine 2008
• ^ [62] "Tribes". aiac.state.al.us.
• ^ [63] "State Recognized Tribes". National Conference of State Legislatures. Retrieved July 14, 2018.
• ^ [64] Watson, Blake A. "Indian Gambling in Ohio: What are the Odds?" (PDF). Capital University Law Review 237 (2003) (excerpts). Archived from the original (PDF) on September 27, 2007. Retrieved September 30, 2007. Ohio in any event does not officially recognize Indian tribes.
• ^ [65] [a] [b] "State Recognized Tribes". National Conference of State Legislatures. Archived from the original on September 1, 2022. Retrieved April 6, 2017.
• ^ [66] Pember, Mary Annette (June 21, 2021). "Shawnee reclaim the great Serpent Mound". ICT. Retrieved February 26, 2023.
• ^ [67] Indian Affairs Bureau (January 12, 2023). "Indian Entities Recognized by and Eligible To Receive Services From the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs". Federal Register. 88: 2112–16. Retrieved February 26, 2023.
• ^ [68] "Tribal Historic Preservation Office, Cultural Preservation Department" (PDF). The Absentee Shawnee News. No. 11, Vol. 25. Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma. November 2010. p. 15. Retrieved March 8, 2023.
• ^ [69] [a] [b] Barnes, Ben. "Appreciating and Protecting Federal Native Recognition". Indianz.com. Retrieved February 26, 2023.
• ^ [70] Filby, Max; King, Danae (October 9, 2023). "What does it mean to be a Native American tribe? In Ohio, the answer is complicated". The Columbus Dispatch. Archived from the original on November 27, 2023. Retrieved January 12, 2024. She now considers herself to be a tribal elder with the East of the River Shawnee, a non-federally recognized group that broke off from the United Remnant Band of Shawnee years ago.
• ^ [71] "American Indians in Ohio", Ohio Memory: An Online Scrapbook of Ohio History. The Ohio Historical Society, retrieved October 10, 2006 [dead link]
• ^ [72] [a] [b] Lazarus, David. "Tribal question a matter of dollars", Los Angeles Times, November 2, 2007, accessed January 11, 2014
• ^ [73] Mulkearn, Lois. George Mercer Papers: Relating to the Ohio Company of Virginia. University of Pittsburgh Press, 1954.
• ^ [74] Paul A. W. Wallace, Indians in Pennsylvania, DIANE Publishing Inc., 2007, p. 127. ISBN 1422314936
• ^ [75] Kakowatchiky