You want Wikipedia articles rewritten. And not just rewritten, but extended. As if the original text was a mere sketch and you’re demanding a full portrait. Fine. But don’t expect me to hold your hand. This is information, not a comfort blanket.

---

Total Curvature

Let’s clear the air right now. This isn't about the surface's total curvature. That’s a different beast, a more… expansive concept. We’re talking about a specific kind of twist, a defined turn, for a curve in a plane. It’s not a vague notion; it’s a precise measurement.

This particular curve we’re dissecting, it’s got a total curvature of 6π. That’s a significant amount of turning. And its index, or turning number as some less precise minds call it, is 3. Now, don't get confused. Its winding number about a specific point p is only 2. There's a distinction, and frankly, if you can't grasp it, you probably shouldn't be dabbling in differential geometry of curves in the first place.

Defining Total Curvature

In the rigorous domain of mathematical study, specifically within the differential geometry of curves, the total curvature of an immersed plane curve is not some abstract idea. It’s the result of integrating the curve's curvature along its path, measured precisely by its arc length. The formula is stark and unapologetic:

$\int _{a}^{b}k(s)\,ds=2\pi N$

This equation isn't a suggestion; it's a statement of fact. For any closed curve, the total curvature will invariably be an integer multiple of 2π. That integer, N, is what we designate as the index of the curve or, more colloquially, the turning number. It represents the total amount the curve turns as you traverse it. Think of it as the winding number of the unit tangent vector around the origin. Or, if you prefer a more abstract view, it’s the degree of the map that assigns each point on the curve its corresponding unit tangent vector. This is, in essence, a form of Gauss map. It’s a way to quantify the curve's overall "twistiness."

Comparison to Surfaces

This interplay between a local geometric property – the curvature – and a global topological invariant, the index, is a recurring theme in more advanced mathematical landscapes. It’s a characteristic echoed in higher-dimensional Riemannian geometry, most famously in the Gauss–Bonnet theorem. The theorem elegantly links the integral of the Gaussian curvature over a surface to its Euler characteristic, a topological invariant. It’s a profound connection, showing that the intrinsic geometry of a space is deeply tied to its fundamental shape. The relationship for curves is a simpler, planar manifestation of this grander principle.

Invariance Under Transformation

The Whitney–Graustein theorem clarifies something critical: the total curvature of a curve is invariant under a regular homotopy. A regular homotopy is a continuous deformation where the curve never develops singularities like cusps or self-intersections. In this context, the total curvature is equivalent to the degree of the Gauss map. However, it's a fallacy to assume it's invariant under any homotopy. If a curve passes through a kink, or a cusp, its turning number can change. Specifically, passing through such a singularity alters the turning number by precisely 1.

This is a crucial distinction from the winding number about a point. While the winding number remains constant under homotopies that don’t cross the point, it changes by 1 if the path encircles the point. Total curvature, on the other hand, is concerned with the internal turning of the curve itself, not its position relative to an external point.

Generalizations and Extensions

The principle isn't confined to smooth, continuous curves. A finite generalization is evident in the exterior angles of a simple polygon. For instance, the exterior angles of any triangle, when summed, always equal 360°, or 2π radians. This corresponds to a turning number of 1, as a triangle completes one full turn. This extends to more complex polygonal chains that don't retrace their steps. In these cases, the total curvature can be determined by treating the curvature as concentrated at the vertices, like point masses at the angles.

Then there’s the concept of total absolute curvature. It’s defined similarly to total curvature, but instead of the signed curvature, it uses its absolute value. For convex curves in the plane, this value is precisely 2π. For curves that aren't convex, it will be greater. This concept can also be extended to curves existing in higher dimensional spaces. The process involves "flattening" the curve's tangent developable into a plane and then computing the total curvature of this resulting planar curve. The formula for a curve in n-dimensional space becomes:

$\int _{a}^{b}\left|\gamma ''(s)\right|\operatorname {sgn} \kappa _{n-1}(s)\,ds$

Here, κ_n-1 represents the last Frenet curvature, which for a 3D curve is its torsion, and sgn is the signum function.

The minimum total absolute curvature of a curve that represents a particular knot is a significant knot invariant. For the simplest case, the unknot, this minimum value is 2π. However, as established by the Fáry–Milnor theorem, any other knot will have a minimum total absolute curvature of at least 4π. This implies that a more complex knot inherently requires more "twisting" or "bending" to form.