← Back to home

United Nations Research Institute For Social Development

United Nations Research Institute for Social Development

The United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) is not merely another acronym in the sprawling bureaucracy of global governance. It stands as an autonomous research institute operating within the intricate framework of the United Nations. Its existence, formally established on 1 August 1963, a respectable 62 years ago, was predicated on a rather ambitious, some might say perpetually elusive, mandate: to undertake rigorous, multidisciplinary research and incisive policy analysis specifically addressing the social dimensions of contemporary development issues. This isn't just about cataloging problems; it's about dissecting the underlying societal complexities that often get overlooked in the rush for purely economic progress.

Headquartered in the perpetually diplomatic city of Geneva, Switzerland, UNRISD operates from the well-trodden corridors of the United Nations Office at Geneva. Its legal status is unequivocally active, a testament to its enduring, if sometimes challenging, relevance. The Institute functions under the direct oversight of the United Nations Economic and Social Council, reporting to it with a regularity that suggests accountability, even in the realm of critical thought. The current Director, a role of considerable intellectual and administrative weight, is Magdalena Sepúlveda Carmona, steering its research agenda through the labyrinthine challenges of global social development. Further insights into its operations and publications can be found via its official website, unrisd.org, and those with a particular penchant for the machinations of global governance might find its details within the broader Politics portal of the United Nations system.

The core mission of UNRISD, as delineated at its inception in 1963, was to conduct policy-relevant research on social development. This research is not an academic exercise in isolation; it is explicitly designed to be pertinent to the operational work of the United Nations Secretariat, various regional commissions, specialized agencies, and, crucially, national institutions grappling with real-world issues. It's a pragmatic approach, aiming to provide the intellectual ammunition needed to inform policy decisions, rather than merely observing the chaos from a distance.

A relatively compact team of dedicated researchers stationed in Geneva orchestrates UNRISD's diverse research programmes. These programmes, perhaps tellingly, focus predominantly on the challenges faced by the developing world. This work is not done in a vacuum; it relies heavily on collaborative efforts with national research teams, drawing expertise from local universities and established research institutes across the globe. The Institute's methodological approach is distinct, characterized by its holistic, multidisciplinary nature, and a steadfast commitment to a political economy perspective. This means looking beyond surface-level symptoms to understand the power structures, economic systems, and historical contexts that shape social outcomes. Their strategic placement at the United Nations Office at Geneva is far from accidental; it grants researchers direct access to crucial channels of policy influence, enabling them to actively participate in the myriad events, meetings, conferences, and working groups that constantly shape global development discourse.

History

The genesis of UNRISD in 1963 was a clear, if perhaps idealistic, attempt to broaden the understanding of societal progress. Its initial mandate was straightforward: "to conduct research into problems and policies of social development, and relationships between various types of social development and economic development." This implicitly acknowledged that mere economic growth, while often lauded, rarely translated automatically into improved social well-being. The Institute's foundational structure was bolstered by a significant grant from the Government of the Netherlands, indicating an early recognition of the importance of its work. Its inaugural Board Chair was none other than the eminent Dutch economist Jan Tinbergen, a figure of considerable intellectual stature who would later, in 1969, be awarded the first-ever Nobel Prize in economic sciences, lending immediate credibility to UNRISD's scholarly ambitions.

In its nascent years, UNRISD's research endeavors were heavily concentrated on the design of robust indicators. The aim was to devise metrics that could measure "development" in a more comprehensive fashion, extending far beyond the simplistic confines of economic growth figures. This meant delving into critical social factors such as nutrition levels, public health outcomes, and educational attainment rates. Consequently, the Institute's early staff complement included a substantial number of statisticians, tasked with the unenviable job of quantifying the qualitative. Another significant early project delved into the potential of cooperatives as a viable tool for fostering development. Predictably, given the complexities of human organization and resource distribution, this research generated results that were, shall we say, controversial, highlighting the often-unforeseen challenges in implementing well-intentioned development models.

By the 1970s, the specter of burgeoning global population growth thrust issues of food production, supply chains, and ultimately entire food systems into the forefront of development discourse. UNRISD's engagement with the so-called Green Revolution—the widespread introduction of newly bred high-yield grain seeds with the aim of dramatically increasing food production—adopted a characteristically critical lens. While the promise of abundant harvests was alluring, UNRISD pointedly highlighted a crucial, often overlooked, reality: the sheer quantity of food available was merely one variable in the complex equation of ensuring populations in developing countries were adequately nourished and not subjected to persistent hunger. Their research underscored the profound role played by pervasive power inequalities, which significantly impacted the equitable distribution of foodstuffs, ultimately determining who received enough to eat and who, tragically, did not. It was a stark reminder that technology alone could not solve systemic injustices.

The 1980s witnessed UNRISD undergoing a period of significant expansion, both in terms of its financial resources and its dedicated staffing. This growth facilitated a diversification of its research remit, allowing it to delve into new areas such as the dynamics of popular participation in governance and the multifaceted challenges associated with refugee issues. This gradual broadening of scope signaled a strategic shift, as the Institute began to move beyond its earlier, intensive preoccupation with statistical methodologies and towards a more expansive engagement with socio-political phenomena.

The 1990s proved to be a particularly vibrant and productive decade for UNRISD. Its research portfolio expanded dramatically, encompassing a wide spectrum of pressing global concerns, from the intricate roots of political violence to the complex socioeconomic ramifications of illicit drugs. The inexorable march of globalization in the modern era, coupled with the often-harsh realities of structural adjustment programmes imposed on developing countries, precipitated widespread social crises. UNRISD meticulously researched these phenomena, providing sharp critiques and cogent arguments. The Institute contended that the unfettered operation of unregulated markets, far from being a panacea, necessitated a robust and healthy public sector and stable, accountable governance structures to function effectively and equitably. Furthermore, environmental issues firmly embedded themselves within global development debates during this period. UNRISD's perspective remained characteristically critical, observing that whatever the ostensible benefits of conservation efforts, they were frequently pursued at the direct expense of social justice and often undermined the precarious livelihoods of marginalized communities and minority groups. It was a clear articulation of the difficult trade-offs inherent in development.

As the new millennium dawned, the 2000s saw globalization continue its relentless advance. In response to the sometimes catastrophic social impacts unleashed by wide-ranging economic liberalization policies, there was a tentative re-introduction of social dimensions into policy discussions. UNRISD, ever vigilant, offered a pointed critique of the prevailing narrow focus on "safety nets" and the targeted assistance of "vulnerable groups." Instead, the Institute powerfully advocated for a more ambitious and truly universal transformative social policy framework, arguing that piecemeal interventions were insufficient to address systemic inequalities.

The 2010s brought with them the monumental adoption of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development by United Nations member states in 2015. This ambitious agenda established a new, comprehensive global roadmap for development, ostensibly charting a course towards a more equitable and sustainable future. UNRISD, naturally, continued its foundational work on social policy, frequently aligning its research with the overarching goals and specific targets embedded within the 2030 Agenda. The decade also saw the Institute embrace the emerging concept of the social and solidarity economy (SSE), exploring its potential contributions to the broader objectives of sustainable development. A notable, if regrettable, dip in output concerning gender issues occurred after 2016, a direct consequence of a reported lack of in-house gender capacity following a period of staff restructuring. However, environmental issues, particularly as they intersect with critical questions of social policy and the urgent imperative of climate justice, have demonstrably re-emerged as a pivotal area of ongoing work, reflecting the escalating global awareness of ecological crises and their disproportionate impact on vulnerable populations.

UNRISD themes and projects

The current research agenda at UNRISD, a carefully curated intellectual framework, is meticulously shaped by three overarching and undeniably formidable contemporary development challenges: the persistent and widening specter of inequalities, the pervasive and often intractable nature of conflict, and the alarming prevalence of unsustainable practices across various sectors. These formidable challenges are addressed through three distinct yet interconnected research programmes:

  • Social Policy and Development: This programme delves into the design, implementation, and impact of social policies aimed at fostering equitable and inclusive development, scrutinizing how such policies can address structural inequalities and promote human well-being.
  • Gender and Development: Focused on understanding and transforming gender power relations, this programme examines how gender intersects with other social divisions to produce inequalities and explores pathways for achieving genuine gender equality in development processes.
  • Social Dimensions of Sustainable Development: This programme critically analyzes the societal implications of environmental degradation and climate change, advocating for approaches to sustainable development that prioritize social justice and the livelihoods of marginalized communities.

Within these broad programmatic umbrellas, UNRISD pursues a diverse array of projects. Some of these represent recently concluded efforts, having delivered their findings and analyses, while others are still actively underway, probing new frontiers of research and policy engagement. A selection of these projects includes:

  • Understanding Gender-Egalitarian Policy Change: When and Why Do States Respond to Women's Claims-Making? (2010–2014): A deep dive into the political dynamics that either facilitate or impede the adoption of policies promoting gender equality.
  • Politics of Domestic Resource Mobilization for Social Development (2011–2018): Investigating how countries finance their social development initiatives, focusing on the political processes behind revenue generation and allocation.
  • Potential and Limits of Social and Solidarity Economy (2012–2013): An exploration into alternative economic models and their capacity to contribute to more inclusive and sustainable development outcomes.
  • New Directions in Social Policy: Alternatives from and for the Global South (2013–2018): Challenging conventional social policy wisdom by examining innovative approaches originating from, and tailored for, contexts in the Global South.
  • Innovations in Care Policies (2015–2016): Researching evolving approaches to care work, its social organization, and its implications for gender equality and well-being.
  • Valueworks: Effects of Financialization along the Copper Value Chain (2017–2018): A critical examination of how financialization impacts commodity chains, using copper as a case study, and its social consequences.
  • Social and Solidarity Economy for the SDGs: Spotlight on the Social Economy in Seoul (2017–2018): Highlighting specific examples of the social and solidarity economy contributing to the Sustainable Development Goals, with a focus on a particular urban context.
  • Just Transition Research Collaborative Phase 1 (2018): Initiating research into the concept of a "just transition," ensuring that the shift to sustainable economies does not leave workers or communities behind.
  • SSE Knowledge Hub for the SDGs (2018–2019): Developing a centralized resource for knowledge and research on the social and solidarity economy in relation to the Sustainable Development Goals.
  • Overcoming Inequalities in a Fractured World: Between Elite Power and Social Mobilization (2018–2020): A comprehensive project analyzing the interplay between entrenched elite power structures and grassroots social movements in the struggle against inequality.
  • Sustainable Development Performance Indicators (2018–2022): Developing and refining metrics to more accurately assess progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals, moving beyond purely economic measures.
  • Transformative Adaptation to Climate Change in Coastal Cities (2019): Investigating innovative and equitable strategies for urban areas to adapt to the profound impacts of climate change, particularly in vulnerable coastal regions.
  • South-South Migration, Inequality and Development Hub (2019–2023): Establishing a research nexus to understand the complex dynamics of migration between countries in the Global South, its impact on inequality, and its role in development.

In a move that some might interpret as a perennial quest for novel engagement, UNRISD has recently introduced an "Ideas Incubator." This mechanism is designed to actively seek out and forge partnerships, thereby expanding its research portfolio and, presumably, injecting fresh perspectives into its ongoing work. It's a pragmatic recognition that the problems are too vast for any single entity to tackle alone.

Publications

UNRISD ensures that its meticulously conducted research reaches a broad audience through a diverse range of publications. These outputs are not merely academic exercises but serve as vital conduits for disseminating critical insights and fostering informed dialogue. The Institute partners with esteemed academic publishers such as Routledge, Palgrave Macmillan, and Wiley Blackwell to produce scholarly books, ensuring wide distribution within academic circles. Beyond these formal book publications, UNRISD also produces an extensive series of research papers and occasional papers, which undergo rigorous peer-review processes to uphold academic standards. Additionally, working papers are published, offering timely insights from ongoing research, albeit without the formal peer-review stage. UNRISD researchers also regularly contribute articles to a variety of scholarly journals, further enriching academic discourse. These publications, by their very nature, are primarily tailored to resonate with an academic audience, providing the detailed analysis and theoretical grounding that scholars demand.

However, recognizing the imperative to transcend purely academic engagement, UNRISD also strategically targets a distinct audience: policy-makers, programme designers, and decision-makers who operate at the sharp end of development implementation. For this crucial demographic, the Institute produces more concise and actionable materials, primarily in the form of briefs. These include both comprehensive research and policy briefs, which synthesize complex findings into digestible recommendations, as well as more focused briefs addressing specific projects, pressing issues, or significant events. These publications are crafted to be directly relevant and immediately useful for those tasked with shaping and executing development policies.

In a commendable commitment to open access and knowledge dissemination, UNRISD maintains a comprehensive online repository. This digital archive, accessible through the publications section of its website, houses an impressive collection of over 1300 publications. The vast majority of items published after 1990 are readily available for free download, democratizing access to its research. For publications that take the form of books, information is provided on how to obtain them directly from the respective publishers.

A testament to the quality and relevance of UNRISD's work, several of its publications have garnered international recognition, achieving significant success and influencing major global debates. The Institute periodically releases flagship reports, which represent monumental efforts to synthesize a substantial body of recent research, offering overarching analyses and strategic directions on critical development issues. These reports often serve as pivotal intellectual milestones, shaping the discourse and priorities within the global development community.

Key publications: Flagship reports

UNRISD's flagship reports are not merely summaries; they are comprehensive intellectual endeavors designed to synthesize vast amounts of research and present a cohesive, often critical, perspective on pressing global challenges. These reports aim to shape policy discourse and provide a robust analytical foundation for understanding complex social phenomena.

  • UNRISD. 2016. Policy Innovations for Transformative Change: Implementing the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. UNRISD, Geneva. This report grappled with the ambitious 2030 Agenda, moving beyond aspirational goals to dissect the practical and political innovations required to achieve transformative change. It likely explored how existing policy frameworks needed to evolve, or be entirely reimagined, to genuinely address the interconnected challenges of poverty, inequality, and environmental degradation, rather than merely tinkering at the margins.
  • UNRISD. 2010. Combating Poverty and Inequality: Structural Change, Social Policy and Politics. UNRISD, Geneva. A decade earlier, this report honed in on the enduring scourges of poverty and inequality. Its title alone suggests UNRISD's characteristic political economy approach, emphasizing that these issues are not simply economic failings but are deeply embedded in structural configurations and political choices. It undoubtedly argued for comprehensive social policies that go beyond superficial interventions, demanding fundamental structural shifts.
  • UNRISD. 2005. Gender Equality: Striving for Justice in an Unequal World. UNRISD. Geneva. This landmark report from the mid-2000s tackled the persistent global struggle for gender equality. Its subtitle, "Striving for Justice in an Unequal World," succinctly captures the Institute's perspective: gender inequality is a profound issue of justice, inextricably linked to broader systemic disparities. It would have provided a critical assessment of progress, or lack thereof, and advocated for policies that challenge patriarchal structures rather than merely accommodating them.
  • UNRISD. 2000. Visible Hands: Taking Responsibility for Social Development. UNRISD, Geneva. As the new millennium began, this report offered a timely reflection on the role of conscious, deliberate action—the "visible hands"—in steering social development. It likely critiqued the notion of development as an automatic, market-driven process, instead emphasizing the imperative for state and societal actors to take active responsibility and implement intentional strategies for social progress.
  • UNRISD. 1995. States of Disarray: The Social Effects of Globalization. UNRISD, Geneva. Published at a time of burgeoning globalization, this report served as an early and prescient warning about its potentially destabilizing social consequences. "States of Disarray" paints a vivid picture of the social fragmentation and increased inequalities that could arise from unchecked global economic integration, advocating for policies that mitigate these adverse effects and prioritize social cohesion.

UNRISD events

UNRISD, recognizing that research findings alone rarely translate directly into policy shifts, frequently convenes a variety of conferences and seminars. These gatherings serve a dual purpose: they act as crucial forums for refining and further developing the Institute's ongoing research, benefiting from the intellectual exchange with a diverse array of scholars and practitioners. Simultaneously, they function as vital platforms for disseminating its findings to a broader audience. These events are often intimately linked with UNRISD's broader strategy for policy impact, serving as invaluable opportunities where development policy makers and practitioners can directly engage with academics actively working on cutting-edge social development issues. It’s where the rubber, theoretically, meets the road.

Recent major UNRISD conferences

In November 2018, UNRISD hosted a significant international conference in Geneva, drawing together innovative research from both the Global South and the Global North. The conference, aptly titled "Overcoming Inequalities in a Fractured World: Between Elite Power and Social Mobilization," reflected UNRISD's enduring commitment to understanding and challenging the roots of global disparities. Keynote speeches were delivered by distinguished figures such as François Bourguignon, a prominent economist known for his work on inequality, and Vandana Shiva, a renowned environmental activist and scholar, whose presence underscored the intersectionality of social and ecological concerns. Preceding the main conference, a stimulating roundtable discussion explored the provocative question of "whether elites are the engines of inequalities." This session featured an impressive panel of academic luminaries, including Naila Kabeer from the London School of Economics, Saskia Sassen of Columbia University, and Jomo Kwame Sundaram, a distinguished member of the Council of Eminent Persons, Malaysia, ensuring a robust and critical examination of power dynamics.

As a cornerstone of its 50th-anniversary celebrations in 2013, UNRISD co-hosted a pivotal conference with the International Labour Organization (ILO). This collaborative event was titled "The Potential and Limits of the Social and Solidarity Economy," a topic reflecting the growing interest in alternative economic models that prioritize social and environmental well-being over purely financial gain. The conference attracted a roster of prominent speakers, including Guy Ryder, the then Director-General of the ILO, alongside influential thinkers such as Jose Luis Coraggio, Paul Singer, and Sarah Cook. Over 40 academics presented their research findings to an engaged audience of approximately 400 participants, fostering a rich exchange of ideas. The main conference was complemented by several side events, enhancing the overall experience. These included a dedicated PhD poster session, various book presentations, a practitioners' forum designed to bridge theory and practice, thought-provoking movie screenings, and a special session on alternative finance and complementary currencies, which was hosted by the UN-NGLS, highlighting innovative approaches to monetary systems.

In 2011, UNRISD organized another impactful conference in Geneva, this time focusing on climate change as an intrinsically social development issue. The conference, "Green Economy and Sustainable Development: Bringing Back the Social Dimension," aimed to counteract the often technocratic or purely economic framing of environmental challenges. It served as a critical forum for developing a nuanced conceptual and policy framework that firmly positioned social dimensions—such as equity, justice, and community well-being—at the very heart of the green economy and sustainable development discourse. The policy reports and other publications specifically prepared for this conference played a significant role, directly informing the preparatory processes for the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20) and subsequently influencing broader policy discussions in the years that followed.

Seminar Series

Beyond its larger international conferences, UNRISD maintains a regular Seminar Series, a more intimate yet equally vital platform for intellectual engagement. These seminars are specifically designed to provide a consistent space for open, informed, and insightful conversations around contemporary issues that are of direct concern to social development research and policy. It's where ongoing debates can be aired, new ideas tested, and critical perspectives exchanged. Recent seminars have tackled a diverse range of topics, reflecting the Institute's expansive research agenda:

  • Blockchain for Inclusive and Sustainable Development: Fact or Fantasy? - This seminar, featuring Helen Hai (Blockchain Charity Foundation and UNIDO Goodwill Ambassador), Ivonne Higuero (UNECE), and Leander Bindewald (MONNETA / Network for Monetary Diversity), explored the much-hyped potential of blockchain technology. It critically examined whether this emerging technology could genuinely contribute to inclusive and sustainable development, or if its promises remained largely speculative.
  • Changing Course for Sustainable Development: Bold Alternatives to Business as Usual - With speakers including Gita Sen (DAWN), Kate Donald (Center for Economic and Social Rights), Sandra Vermuyten (Public Services International), and Ziad Abdel Samad (Arab NGO Network for Development), this seminar challenged conventional development paradigms. It advocated for radical departures from existing practices, proposing "bold alternatives" necessary for achieving truly sustainable and equitable outcomes.
  • The Challenge of Leaving No One Behind: Securing Political Commitment for Inclusive Development - Featuring David Hulme (academic) (University of Manchester), Sam Hickey (University of Manchester), and Sohela Nazneen (Institute of Development Studies, UK), this session delved into the formidable task of ensuring inclusive development. It focused on the crucial, often elusive, element of securing genuine political commitment to reach the most marginalized populations.
  • Towards a Post-Neoliberal World Order: Rebuilding Human Rights-Based Multilateralism - This seminar brought together prominent voices such as Jeremy Corbyn (MP, United Kingdom), Arancha Gonzalez (Executive Director, International Trade Centre), and Nikhil Seth (Executive Director, UNITAR). It explored the urgent need to move beyond neoliberal economic frameworks and reconstruct a multilateral system that is genuinely rooted in human rights principles, addressing the shortcomings of current global governance.

Outreach and communication

In recent years, UNRISD has sharpened its focus on its outreach and communication strategy, recognizing that even the most profound research has limited impact if it remains confined to academic ivory towers. This strategic pivot is driven by four core objectives, each designed to amplify the Institute's voice and ensure its insights resonate where they are most needed:

  • Increase the visibility of UNRISD as an institution: This objective aims to raise the profile of UNRISD, ensuring that its identity and mission are recognized by a wider array of stakeholders, from policymakers to civil society organizations and the general public.
  • Promote the use of its research findings: Beyond mere dissemination, this goal emphasizes actively encouraging the application of UNRISD's research in policy formulation, programme design, and advocacy efforts, transforming knowledge into action.
  • Translate research findings into strong messages that can be communicated to a range of audiences: This involves the critical process of distilling complex academic research into clear, concise, and compelling messages tailored to different audiences, ensuring accessibility and relevance.
  • Document and communicate the impact of UNRISD work: This objective focuses on systematically demonstrating the tangible effects and influence of UNRISD's research, illustrating how its work contributes to positive social change and informs global debates.

The effective communication of research findings has, perhaps unsurprisingly, proven to be an absolutely critical component in strengthening the ultimate purpose and impact of UNRISD's activities. It's not enough to simply produce knowledge; one must also ensure it is received, understood, and acted upon. This strategic communication also plays a vital role in increasing recognition and, crucially, the utilization of UNRISD research by the broader United Nations system, the academic community, civil society organizations, and the essential funding bodies that sustain its operations.

In the digital age, UNRISD maintains an active presence across key social media platforms, including LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter. On the latter, it has recently achieved a notable milestone, surpassing 31,000 followers—a testament to its growing reach in the online sphere, where ideas can spread with unprecedented speed. Furthermore, UNRISD embraces multimedia as a powerful tool for knowledge sharing, making its seminars and conferences accessible to a global audience through online videos and engaging podcasts. This commitment to diverse communication channels ensures that its critical insights can reach a wider and more varied public, extending its influence beyond traditional academic and policy circles.

Policy influence and impacts

UNRISD's distinctive position within the broader United Nations system grants it a significant degree of policy influence, a privilege that is carefully leveraged. What sets it apart, and indeed underpins its critical approach, is its unique governance structure and funding situation. Unlike many other UN entities, UNRISD enjoys a greater latitude for intellectual independence. This autonomy allows it to engage in research that might challenge conventional wisdom or critique prevailing policies without fear of immediate political repercussions—a rare and valuable commodity in international institutions. Its staff members are not mere academics; they actively serve on various UN system-wide committees, task forces, and expert groups, directly injecting UNRISD's research-backed perspectives into ongoing discussions and decision-making processes. Moreover, the Institute routinely undertakes collaborative research initiatives with other UN agencies, fostering a synergistic approach to complex global challenges.

The independent international events, conferences, seminars, and symposiums that UNRISD regularly convenes (as detailed above) are far from mere academic gatherings. They are strategically organized to discuss, present, and critically debate research findings in specific fields of focus. These events are meticulously designed to attract, and often succeed in drawing in, a diverse and influential array of participants. This includes representatives from local and international NGOs, government officials, members of the media, academics from universities and other research institutes, as well as individual researchers and scholars. The collaborative spirit extends to co-hosting and co-organizing events with cooperating universities, NGOs, and local governments, further broadening their reach and impact. This extensive and sustained cooperation with a wide spectrum of social development stakeholders is, in fact, one of the Institute's most potent channels for exerting policy influence and achieving tangible impacts. It's a testament to the idea that genuine change often emerges from the slow, deliberate work of building consensus and sharing knowledge across diverse sectors.

In 2014, UNRISD took the proactive step of publishing a comprehensive brochure specifically detailing the impact of its work. This publication systematically articulated the Institute's contributions across several key dimensions: its impressive agenda-setting capacity, its influence across multiple spheres of policy and academic discourse, and its vital role in networking and capacity building within the global development community. Such a document serves not only as an accountability measure but also as a powerful advocacy tool, demonstrating the concrete value derived from its independent, critical research.

UNRISD Staffing Structure

The operational model of UNRISD is characterized by a lean but highly effective core staff, strategically located in Geneva, Switzerland. This central team acts as the intellectual and administrative hub, coordinating an extensive and dynamic international network of collaborating researchers. This distributed network model allows UNRISD to tap into diverse expertise and local knowledge from around the world without maintaining a massive in-house staff.

Collaboration with UNRISD can manifest in several distinct forms, catering to different types of research engagement and expertise. In some instances, original research may be directly commissioned by the Institute for a centrally coordinated research project, ensuring alignment with UNRISD's strategic priorities. Alternatively, researchers who are already engaged in relevant studies can respond to a specific Call for Papers, submitting their ongoing or completed work for potential publication as part of an UNRISD project. This allows the Institute to integrate high-quality, externally generated research into its thematic areas. Beyond formal projects, UNRISD also actively publishes insightful "think pieces" on its website, providing a platform for collaborating scholars to share their perspectives and analyses on contemporary issues.

The sheer scale of this collaborative ecosystem is impressive: UNRISD's network of currently active collaborating researchers numbers over 400 individuals. Significantly, a large proportion of these esteemed scholars and experts hail from the Global South, ensuring that research perspectives are diverse, contextually rich, and grounded in the realities of those most affected by development challenges. This deliberate emphasis on Southern scholarship is crucial for providing nuanced, locally relevant insights that might otherwise be overlooked.

Governance

The governance of UNRISD is structured to ensure both intellectual independence and accountability within the broader United Nations system. The Institute is ultimately overseen by a distinguished Board, which plays a critical role in guiding its strategic direction and upholding its research integrity. This Board is led by a Chairperson, a key leadership figure who is appointed directly by the UN Secretary-General, underscoring the importance of the Institute's work to the highest echelons of the United Nations.

The selection process for Board members is rigorous and merit-based; individuals are chosen primarily for their deep expertise and extensive qualifications in relevant fields of social development. Once selected, their membership is formally confirmed by the UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), reinforcing the Board's legitimate authority. Crucially, Board members participate in their individual capacity, bringing their independent judgment and experience to the table. They do not, importantly, represent any particular UN member states, a structural detail that further bolsters UNRISD's intellectual autonomy and critical stance. To maintain transparency and accountability, the Board reports biennially to the Commission for Social Development, providing updates on the Institute's activities, research findings, and strategic direction.

Chairs of the Board

The individuals who have chaired the UNRISD Board represent a distinguished roster of academics, policymakers, and development practitioners, each leaving their mark on the Institute's trajectory. Their leadership has been instrumental in shaping UNRISD's research agenda and maintaining its intellectual rigor and independence over the decades.

  • Jan Tinbergen, Netherlands (1963–1974): The inaugural Chair, a Nobel laureate, whose foundational vision set the stage for UNRISD's multidisciplinary approach to development.
  • H.M.A. Onitiri, Nigeria (1975): A key figure who continued the Institute's work in its early, formative years.
  • M.T. Diawara, Côte d'Ivoire (1976–1982): Provided leadership during a period of expanding research focus.
  • K.A. Naqvi, India (1977): Contributed to the Institute's intellectual direction, reflecting perspectives from the Global South.
  • Gustavo Esteva, Mexico (1983): A prominent voice in alternative development, his brief tenure likely influenced critical perspectives.
  • Paul-Marc Henry, France (1984–1988): Guided the Institute through a period of diversification in its research themes.
  • Keith Griffin (economist), United Kingdom (1989–1994): A renowned development economist who oversaw UNRISD during a dynamic phase of global change, including the rise of globalization critiques.
  • Juan Somavia, Chile (1995–1997): Later Director-General of the ILO, his leadership at UNRISD predated his prominent international role.
  • Emma Rothschild, United Kingdom (1998–2005): An acclaimed historian and economist, her long tenure spanned the turn of the millennium, contributing significantly to UNRISD's engagement with global social issues.
  • Lourdes Arizpe, Mexico (2006–2011): A distinguished anthropologist, she brought a critical cultural and social perspective to the Board's leadership.
  • Maureen O'Neil, Canada (2012–2017): Guided the Institute through the critical period leading up to and immediately following the adoption of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
  • Joakim Palme, Sweden (2017–present): The current Chair, continuing to steer UNRISD's strategic direction in an increasingly complex world.

Directors

The Director of UNRISD holds a pivotal position, serving as the chief executive officer and intellectual leader of the Institute. This individual reports to both the governing Board and, through the Commission for Social Development, to ECOSOC, ensuring both internal oversight and external accountability. The Director carries substantial responsibility, overseeing all aspects of UNRISD's research activities, a complex portfolio that requires both scholarly acumen and strategic vision. Furthermore, the Director is charged with the crucial task of fundraising, securing the voluntary contributions that sustain the Institute's operations. This role also encompasses managing external relations with the UN secretariat, engaging with senior UN officials, liaising with specialized UN agencies, cultivating relationships with donors, and fostering collaborations with other research entities worldwide. Beyond these administrative and diplomatic duties, Directors are also expected to remain actively engaged in research themselves, embodying the scholarly mission of UNRISD.

  • Jan F. de Jongh (1964–1967)
  • Donald V. McGranahan (1967–1977)
  • Solon L. Barraclough (1977–1984)
  • Enrique J. Oteiza (1984–1987)
  • Dharam Ghai (1987–1997)
  • Thandika Mkandawire (1998–2009): A hugely influential African economist, his long tenure as Director profoundly shaped UNRISD's focus on African development, democratic governance, and social policy, leading to significant intellectual output.
  • Sarah Cook (2009–2015)
  • Paul Ladd (2015–2024)
  • Magdalena Sepúlveda Carmona (2024–Present): The current Director, bringing a wealth of experience in human rights and social justice to the helm.

Funding

UNRISD operates on a financial model that is, by design, both precarious and liberating. The Institute relies entirely on voluntary funding, drawing its resources from a diverse array of governments, dedicated development agencies, and philanthropic foundations. Crucially, it receives no direct funding from the regular United Nations budget. This arrangement, while undeniably susceptible to fluctuations in donor priorities and global economic shifts, simultaneously guarantees a significant degree of the Institute's independent status. This financial autonomy is not merely a bureaucratic detail; it is the very bedrock upon which UNRISD builds its capacity for critical inquiry. It affords the Institute a certain "critical latitude," allowing it to undertake research and articulate findings that might be less palatable or more challenging for entities directly dependent on assessed contributions from [UN member states](/Member_states_of the_United_Nations). This structural independence is vital for its ability to offer unbiased, evidence-based critiques of development policies and practices.

Over its more than five decades of operation, UNRISD has been supported by contributions from a wide range of governments across the globe, reflecting a broad international recognition of its value. These contributing nations include: Australia, Austria, Canada, Cuba, Cyprus, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Iran, Iraq, Italy, Jamaica, Mexico, the Netherlands, Nicaragua, Norway, the Republic of Korea, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, the United States of America, and the former Yugoslavia. This diverse list of donors underscores the global relevance and perceived importance of UNRISD's independent research in the complex and often contentious field of social development.