Ferdinand Lassalle - Sarcasm Wiki

Contents

1. Overview
2. Etymology
3. Cultural Impact

Ferdinand Lassalle

Lassalle in 1860. A portrait that, much like the man himself, is a study in contrasts – a hint of intellectual intensity beneath a veneer of bourgeois respectability.

Born Ferdinand Johann Gottlieb Lassal

11 April 1825 Breslau , Kingdom of Prussia (now Wrocław , Poland )

Died 31 August 1864 (aged 39) Carouge , Switzerland

Political party General German Workers’ Association (1863–1864)

Education • University of Breslau • University of Berlin

Philosophical work Era 19th-century philosophy Region German philosophy School Hegelian philosophy

Main interests • Political philosophy • Economics • History

Notable ideas • Iron law of wages • State socialism

Signature

Ferdinand Johann Gottlieb Lassalle, a name that echoes with the fervor of revolution and the sharp edges of intellectual debate, was born on April 11, 1825, in Breslau , then part of the Kingdom of Prussia , and now the vibrant city of Wrocław in Poland . He lived a life that burned brightly and briefly, culminating in his death on August 31, 1864, at the young age of thirty-nine, in Carouge , Switzerland . Lassalle was a complex figure, a German jurist, philosopher, and a tireless socialist activist. He is most famously remembered as a pivotal figure in the genesis of the social democratic movement within Germany. In 1863, driven by his convictions, he founded the General German Workers’ Association (ADAV), a landmark achievement as it was the very first independent political party established for German workers. His theoretical contributions to political discourse included the concept of state socialism and the popularization, if not outright formulation, of the infamous iron law of wages .

Born into a prosperous Jewish family in Breslau , Lassalle’s early intellectual life was deeply shaped by Hegelian philosophy, a path he embraced with youthful passion. The decades of the 1840s and 1850s saw him gain considerable public recognition, not just for his political leanings but also for his tenacious legal defense of Countess Sophie von Hatzfeldt in a protracted and highly publicized legal battle that aimed to vindicate her rights. His involvement in the tumultuous revolutions of 1848 further cemented his public profile, though it also led to a complex and often fraught relationship with contemporaries like Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels . Beyond his activism, Lassalle was a prolific intellectual, authoring significant works that delved into philosophy and law. His 1857 treatise, Heraclitus the Obscure (Die Philosophie Herakleitos des Dunklen von Ephesos ), offered a unique Hegelian interpretation of the ancient philosopher, while his 1861 legal study, The System of Acquired Rights (Das System der erworbenen Rechte ), challenged established legal doctrines.

Lassalle’s foray into the political arena intensified in the early 1860s, coinciding with the significant constitutional crisis brewing in Prussia. Distancing himself from the liberal progressive factions, he embarked on a determined public campaign to establish a distinct political voice for the working class. This agitation culminated in the formation of the ADAV, a party whose core tenet was the pursuit of socialism through state-supported producers’ co-operatives, achievable via the mechanism of universal suffrage . His strategic approach to politics was notably pragmatic, focusing on electoral engagement and even exploring avenues for cooperation with the state. This led him to engage in discreet negotiations with the influential Prussian Minister President Otto von Bismarck . The aim was to forge a strategic alliance between the burgeoning workers’ movement and the conservative Prussian establishment, a move calculated to counter the influence of the liberal bourgeoisie . Lassalle’s personality was as remarkable as his intellect; he possessed a flamboyant and often notorious character that set him apart in the landscape of German social democracy. While this charisma brought him significant recognition, it also contributed to a leadership style that leaned more towards the theatricality of a demagogue than the measured approach of a consensus-building leader.

Tragically, Lassalle’s burgeoning political career was abruptly cut short. In 1864, at the age of thirty-nine, he was killed in a duel, the unfortunate outcome of a romantic entanglement involving a young woman he intended to marry. Despite the ADAV’s modest membership numbers at the time of his death, numbering only in the thousands, the organization he founded would eventually blossom into a formidable political force within the German Empire . In 1875, the ADAV merged with the Social Democratic Workers’ Party of Germany , laying the groundwork for what would ultimately become the powerful Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD). Lassalle’s intellectual legacy, particularly his inclination towards state socialism and his nationalist leanings, left an indelible mark on German social democracy, often creating points of contention and divergence from the theories espoused by Marxism .

Early life and education

Childhood in Breslau

Ferdinand Lassal, who later adopted the more French-sounding spelling “Lassalle,” entered the world on April 11, 1825, in Breslau , the heart of Prussian Silesia . His family, of Jewish heritage, had roots in Poland before migrating to Prussian Silesia in the late 18th century. His father, Heymann Lassal, a man trained for the rabbinical life, had transitioned into a successful wholesale silk merchant, providing a comfortable upbringing for his children. Ferdinand had a sister, Frederike, affectionately known as Riekchen.

The year 1840 marked a significant moment for the young Ferdinand when his father presented him with a diary for the New Year. Not yet fifteen, the boy began a meticulous record of his days, his perceived faults, and his attempts at self-improvement, driven by an earnest desire to understand and shape his own character. His early entries reveal a mind already sharp and quick, capable of genuine affection but also exhibiting a pragmatic, almost ruthless, streak when pursuing his desires. He was an insatiable reader, harboring grand dreams of glory and a life of heroic deeds, akin to a knight-errant . He was acutely aware of his social standing, sensitive about his Jewish identity, and perhaps a touch resentful of his background as the son of a merchant from a provincial town. His diary entries also hint at an early fascination with gambling, a sharp eye for financial matters, and a remarkable ability to rationalize his actions, such as playing billiards against his father’s express wishes. His youthful writings also touch upon romantic entanglements, offering unsolicited advice to family friends.

The Lassalle household was not always a tranquil one, prone to quick tempers and emotional outbursts. Ferdinand cultivated a close bond with his father, who often seemed disappointed by his wife’s deafness and his daughter’s perceived lack of intellectual engagement. However, Heymann himself possessed a fiery temperament, and Ferdinand’s own fastidiousness and wilfulness occasionally led to friction. A particularly heated argument over trousers, a seemingly trivial matter, brought Ferdinand to the brink of contemplating suicide, a dark turn his father, with surprising gentleness, managed to avert. Despite these moments of tension, Heymann generally treated his son not as a child, but as an equal, involving him in family decisions, particularly concerning Riekchen’s prospects for marriage.

School, for young Lassalle, was largely an unhappy experience. He chafed under discipline, and his academic reports were frequently unsatisfactory. To spare his father distress, he resorted to forging his parents’ signatures on his school reports, a deception that, when nearly discovered, prompted him to persuade his father to send him to a commercial school in Leipzig .

His diary also offers glimpses of early idealistic convictions. He expressed a strong sense of Jewish identity, dreaming of leading his people, “sword in hand, along the path to their independence,” a vision perhaps inspired by the heroic figures in Edward Bulwer-Lytton ’s novel Leila; or, The Siege of Granada .

Leipzig (1840–1841)

Lassalle in Leipzig, circa 1840. A youthful, perhaps a bit too earnest, depiction.

In early May of 1840, Ferdinand, accompanied by his father, embarked on a journey to Leipzig, with a stopover in Berlin . Heymann spared no expense, arranging for Ferdinand to lodge with Herr Hander, the headmaster of a Realschule , a testament to his paternal affection. Ferdinand, at fifteen, was treated with a degree of deference usually reserved for a man of twenty within the Hander household.

Life in Leipzig was a mixture of homesickness and exasperation for Lassalle, though rarely dull. His diary entries from this period reflect a burgeoning revolutionary spirit, particularly stirred by the events of the Damascus affair in 1840. He wrote with fiery disdain of the Jewish community’s response, declaring, “Cowardly race, you deserve no better fate! … You were born to be slaves!” His reading list at this time was equally impactful, including the letters of Ludwig Börne , which painted a picture of Germany as “one great prison where human rights are trodden under foot.” The poetry of Heinrich Heine and the dramatic intensity of Friedrich Schiller ’s play Fiesco also left a profound impression. Reflecting on Fiesco, he exhibited a remarkably acute self-awareness, noting: “Had I been born a prince or ruler I should have been an aristocrat, body and soul. But now, as I am only a poor burgher ’s son, I shall be a democrat in good time.” His engagement with Johann Wolfgang von Goethe ’s Wilhelm Meister prompted him to contrast his own trajectory with Meister’s; while Meister turned from commerce to Art, Lassalle felt he had forsaken an “aesthetic life” for trade, primarily to escape his “horrible position” at home. Yet, he harbored a deep-seated belief that fate, or perhaps Providence, was guiding him towards a life dedicated to “Freedom rather than markets.”

His ambitions began to crystallize into a clear, albeit dramatic, declaration: “I will proclaim Freedom to the Peoples even if it costs me my life. I swear it by God and beneath the stars … the blood of princes shall flow.” The domestic situation with the Handers grew increasingly strained, as Herr Hander proved to be a rather pompous and untrustworthy individual. The unexpected death of Marie, the Handers’ young daughter, with whom Ferdinand had formed a bond, led to an awkward confrontation where Hander revealed his intention to ask Ferdinand to leave due to a lack of space. Similar friction arose with the school director, Schiebe.

Ultimately, Lassalle abandoned any notion of a commercial career. During a visit home in the summer of 1841, he successfully persuaded his father to allow him to pursue university studies. He declared his intention to study history, considering it “the greatest subject in the world,” not as a path to a conventional career, but as a means to champion humanity’s highest ideals and to “enlighten and illumine” the populace.

University and Hegelianism

The period between leaving Leipzig and commencing his university studies was spent back in Breslau, where Lassalle diligently prepared for his matriculation examinations. He cultivated an “iron determination to study,” often sequestering himself indoors for days, consumed by his books. Although initially met with refusal, his persistent appeal to the Prussian Minister of Education eventually granted him permission to sit the matriculation examination in 1842. While his essay on “The Development of the idea of the Humane” deeply impressed the examiners, he failed due to the evident hostility of the presiding Commissioner, Dr. David Schulz. He successfully passed the examination the following year.

A depiction of a young Lassalle, perhaps capturing the intellectual fire that would define him.

Lassalle’s university journey was split between the University of Breslau , where he studied from 1843 to 1844 and again in the summer of 1845, and the University of Berlin , from 1844 to 1845 and from the autumn of 1845 onwards. It was during his early undergraduate years at Breslau that he encountered the profound philosophy of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel . This encounter proved to be a “first big milestone” in his life, providing him with a philosophical framework that offered “full satisfaction.” He became an ardent follower of Hegelian philosophy, though he did not align himself with the more radical Young Hegelians . He described the impact of Hegelian philosophy as a “second birth,” which bestowed upon him “clarity, self-assurance … made of me self-containing Intellect, that is self-conscious God.” This philosophical awakening liberated him from the romantic revolutionary fervor of Heine, transforming him into a “determined socialist,” albeit one who believed that the advent of a new social order would stem from the “inevitable triumph of the Hegelian idea” rather than from violent uprisings. His immersion in Hegel’s thought also served to reinforce his already high regard for the Prussian state. While Hegelian dialectic became a powerful tool for him to analyze and resolve problems in accordance with his own aspirations, contributing to his formidable self-assurance, it also, perhaps inadvertently, led to a diminished sense of humor, proportion, and critical self-reflection.

He became an active member of the Raczeks, a student association in Breslau dedicated to the rigorous study of Hegel and his intellectual successors, including figures like Ludwig Feuerbach and Arnold Ruge . In April 1844, he relocated to Berlin, adopting a life of frugal austerity at 52 Unter den Linden , dedicating himself to an intense regimen of study, with a primary focus on Hegel. He penned a lengthy, forty-page letter to his father, articulating his Hegelian interpretation of history, the role of industry, and the eventual emergence of a Communist State where “man’s subjective individuality will come to real fruition in the conception of the State as an organised whole.”

His life in Berlin was not exclusively confined to the academic sphere. He engaged in a passionate love affair with a musician named Lonni Grodzka, whom he later facilitated in marrying off when his interest waned. He also cultivated a circle of devoted followers, his self-proclaimed “Triumviri”: Arnold Mendelssohn, a physician and a cousin of the prominent banking family; Alexander Oppenheim, a young lawyer; and Albert Lehfeldt, a fellow student. Mendelssohn, in particular, became deeply captivated by Lassalle’s intellectual charisma, expressing his admiration in fervent letters. Lassalle’s primary ambition during this period was to develop his own comprehensive philosophical system, with his work on Heraclitus serving as a preliminary step to establish his academic credentials.

Hatzfeldt affair (1846–1854)

Sophie von Hatzfeldt . A woman of noble birth caught in a protracted legal and personal struggle.

In early 1846, Lassalle encountered Countess Sophie von Hatzfeldt , an encounter he later described as the “second big milestone of his career.” The Countess, born in 1805 into a distinguished noble lineage, had endured an unhappy marriage since 1822 to her cousin, Count Edmund von Hatzfeldt-Kinsweiler. The Count was known for his infidelity and financial recklessness, and he had cruelly denied her access to their elder children. Having exhausted avenues of support from her own family and the royal court, the 41-year-old Countess, by 1846, found herself isolated and embittered, yet resolute in her determination to seek legal justice against her husband.

Lassalle, introduced to her through a mutual acquaintance from the intellectual salons of Karl August Varnhagen von Ense , dedicated the next eight years of his life, almost exclusively, to championing her cause and vindicating her claims against her husband. He later characterized his motivation as that of a “revolutionary of the school of Robespierre ,” driven by an imperative to act against social injustice. His own temperament contained an “irrepressible urge towards knight-errantry,” and the sheer public spectacle, the high social standing of both his client and her adversary, and the considerable financial stakes involved undoubtedly appealed to the ambition of the “obscure young Jew from the provinces.” According to his biographer Eduard Bernstein , the affair also held a particular allure for Lassalle because it presented a challenge that “only the use of extraordinary measures, and the display of extraordinary energy, could bring to a successful issue. What would have repelled others, unquestionably attracted him.”

The precise nature of their personal relationship became a subject of considerable speculation. Lassalle himself, in later conversations with Helene von Dönniges, implied a degree of intimacy, suggesting it was “more or less as you say,” but emphasized that their enduring bond was one of “gratitude.” In a lengthy Hegelian letter penned to the Countess in the 1850s, he argued against the existence of any physical relationship. In 1857, he gave his solemn word of honor that no such intimacy had ever occurred. The Countess, in her will drafted in 1852, referred to Lassalle as “the best of sons.” Footman, in his biography, concludes that “posterity can only guess at what these words imply… We only know that each remained a major factor in the life of the other.”

The protracted legal campaign involved a complex web of lawsuits: demands for alimony, actions against the Count’s alleged squandering of her dowry, and the establishment of a legal domicile for the purpose of divorce. The affair evolved into a public sensation, characterized by polemical articles, libel suits, the suborning of witnesses, and aggressive tactics employed by both sides. Bernstein vividly describes the struggle as encompassing “extraordinary measures of underground warfare; the spying, the bribery, the burrowing in the nastiest scandal and filth.” He posits that Lassalle did not emerge from this ordeal “scatheless,” suggesting that these “inverted Augean labours ” permanently altered his character, contributing to a “loss of good taste, that want of moral judgment, henceforth so often shown.”

A dramatic turn occurred in August 1846 when Lassalle’s associates, Mendelssohn and Oppenheim, attempted to seize a casket from the Count’s mistress, Baroness von Meyendorff. They believed this casket contained a deed of gift that would severely damage the interests of the Countess’s son, Paul . This action resulted in Oppenheim’s arrest on charges of theft and Mendelssohn’s hasty flight to England. Lassalle provided financial support to Mendelssohn and attempted, though unsuccessfully, to enlist the aid of Heinrich Heine and Alexander von Humboldt in a public relations campaign and to secure Oppenheim’s release. Throughout these turbulent events, Lassalle’s father, Heymann, bore the considerable financial burden with remarkable patience and fortitude. Oppenheim was eventually acquitted of the charges. Lassalle himself faced arrest in March 1847, accused of complicity in the Oppenheim case, but was acquitted after six weeks of detention.

Revolution of 1848 and aftermath

Lassalle, circa 1850s. A more mature portrait, hinting at the trials he had already endured.

The period of the revolutions of 1848 saw Lassalle briefly imprisoned due to his entanglement in the Hatzfeldt affair. On January 11, 1848, he and Countess Hatzfeldt were handed a two-month prison sentence for criminal libel, though they lodged an appeal. In February, he was arrested in Potsdam on charges of complicity in the theft of certain documents pertinent to the case and was subsequently transferred to Cologne . At his trial in August 1848, Lassalle delivered a “spirited counter-attack,” masterfully framing his own cause as intrinsically linked with Liberty and Democracy. His acquittal was hailed as a significant victory for the Left in the Rhineland .

It was during this politically charged era that Lassalle first encountered Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels . Marx was then the editor of the influential Neue Rheinische Zeitung in Cologne. Engels, from the outset, harbored a distinct dislike for Lassalle, expressing disapproval of his “glibness, ostentation and self-importance,” and was particularly put off by the Hatzfeldt scandal. Marx, while not entirely oblivious to these character traits, proved more accommodating, recognizing and appreciating Lassalle’s drive and considerable intellectual capabilities. Lassalle delivered his inaugural public political speech on August 29, 1848, at a protest gathering in Cologne organized against the arrest of the celebrated revolutionary poet Ferdinand Freiligrath . He became actively involved in political activities throughout the Rhineland, maintaining frequent communication with Marx. In November 1848, in response to the government’s actions against the Prussian National Assembly in Berlin, Lassalle advocated for armed resistance and was subsequently arrested on charges of inciting the populace to take up arms. He remained in custody for six months. At his trial in May 1849, he was acquitted of the primary charge, but was immediately rearrested for inciting violence against authorities, leading to an additional two months of detention. He was eventually sentenced in July 1849 to six months’ imprisonment, a sentence he did not begin serving until over a year later. For his main trial, Lassalle meticulously prepared a speech that was later published as the “Assize Court Speech,” although it was never actually delivered, as the court had decided to exclude the public from the proceedings.

Following his release in 1849, Lassalle remained in the Rhineland, often described as “the last of the Mohicans,” while Marx and other prominent Left-wing leaders sought exile abroad. He maintained a warm and supportive correspondence with Marx and his wife, Jenny , offering assistance during their early years of financial hardship in London. Lassalle finally served his six-month prison sentence from October 1850 to April 1851. During this period, Marx proposed Lassalle’s membership in the Communist League . However, the Cologne committee, under the leadership of Heinrich Bürgers , who had a history of past disagreements with Lassalle concerning the Hatzfeldt affair, rejected the proposal, citing Lassalle’s “reputation.” Lassalle himself remained unaware of this rejection. Following the Cologne Communist Trial in late 1851, which resulted in the imprisonment of Bürgers and others, Lassalle, who was not implicated, offered support to them and their families.

By 1854, the protracted Hatzfeldt affair finally reached its conclusion. Through a complex series of maneuvers, involving intrigue and blackmail directed at the Count’s estate agent, Stockum, Lassalle compelled Count Hatzfeldt to agree to a financially acceptable settlement. Countess Hatzfeldt ultimately received over 300,000 thalers . Lassalle himself secured an annuity of 4,000 thalers from these funds, later increased to 7,000 thalers. He explained this arrangement as compensation for his considerable sacrifices and to ensure he was not unduly beholden to the Countess. This settlement afforded him a comfortable financial standing for the remainder of his life.

“Man of means” and intellectual development

A depiction of Lassalle, perhaps conveying his confidence and intellectual bearing.

Following the resolution of the Hatzfeldt settlement, Lassalle initially resided in Düsseldorf with the Countess, maintaining his connections with the local working-class communities. He commenced an affair with Agnes Dennis-Street , the daughter of Georg Klindworth , a known political intelligence agent. Klindworth became a valuable source of information for Lassalle, providing insights that were useful not only for political maneuvering (some of which he shared with Marx) but also for speculation on the stock exchange. In 1855, Agnes gave birth to Lassalle’s daughter.

Lassalle’s relationship with Countess Hatzfeldt entered a phase of considerable strain. He was driven by ambition, while she harbored fears of a solitary old age. Her son, Paul, also harbored resentment towards Lassalle. Lassalle harbored a strong desire to relocate to Berlin, intending to focus on his long-planned work on Heraclitus and to bask in the intellectual and social limelight of the capital’s salons. However, permission for his residence in Berlin was repeatedly denied by the authorities. In 1856, he undertook an extensive tour of Eastern Europe with his brother-in-law, Friedland, visiting cities such as Budapest , Belgrade , Bucharest , and Istanbul . During this journey, he received news of Arnold Mendelssohn’s death in the Crimean War , an event that affected him deeply. The tour was cut short due to the Countess’s financial anxieties, exacerbated by a downturn in the stock market.

Meanwhile, his relationship with Marx had begun to deteriorate. In 1853, Marx received an unfavorable report concerning Lassalle from an individual named Wiss. In 1855, Gustav Lewy, a democrat from Düsseldorf, lodged a denunciation of Lassalle with Marx in London, accusing him of exploiting the workers’ movement for personal gain and engaging in dangerous political machinations. Although no further concrete evidence emerged, Marx was reportedly “deeply impressed” by these accusations and retained a persistent sense of mistrust towards Lassalle.

Karl Marx . A pivotal figure in socialist thought, whose relationship with Lassalle was complex and often strained.

In 1857, through the influential intervention of Alexander von Humboldt , Lassalle finally obtained a six-month permit to reside in Berlin, ostensibly for medical treatment and the publication of his work on Heraclitus. He re-established contact with Marx, sending him a copy of his Heraclitus the Obscure, the Philosopher of Ephesus (Die Philosophie Herakleitos des Dunklen von Ephesos ), which was published in two volumes in 1857. This work, presenting a distinctly Hegelian interpretation of the Ephesian philosopher, was met with positive reception within Berlin’s academic circles, earning praise from scholars like Humboldt, Varnhagen, and Karl Richard Lepsius . This recognition led to his admission into the prestigious Berlin Philosophical Society. Marx, however, while acknowledging the work as “masterly,” found it excessively verbose and insufficiently critical of Hegel’s own philosophy. To Engels, Marx was even more dismissive, characterizing the book as a “feeble composition” that, despite its erudition, lacked originality and amounted to little more than a diluted rendition of the relevant sections of Hegel’s History of Philosophy (Lectures on the History of Philosophy ). Lassalle, for his part, remained unaware of Marx’s private criticisms. Bernstein observed that the book clearly articulated Lassalle’s strong Hegelian conviction in the state as the embodiment of “the realization of the universal actual Will,” coupled with a fervent aspiration for fame, which he viewed as “the immortality of man attained and made real.”

His social life in Berlin was marked by further romantic involvements, including an affair with Lina Duncker, the wife of his publisher, Franz Duncker . These social entanglements, along with others, created further friction in his relationship with Countess Hatzfeldt. An altercation with an army officer named Fabrice, who was also a rival for Lina Duncker’s affections, resulted in a public scandal and a police order for Lassalle’s expulsion from Berlin. Lassalle managed to successfully appeal this order, partly through the intervention of a petition submitted to Prince Wilhelm of Prussia . His daughter with Agnes Dennis-Street died in September 1857, an event that appears to have had minimal discernible impact on him.

In 1859, Lassalle published a tragedy written in blank verse , titled Franz von Sickingen (Franz von Sickingen ), and a pamphlet on foreign policy, The Italian War and Prussia’s Duty: Democracy’s Call (Der italienische Krieg und die Aufgabe Preussens: eine Stimme aus der Demokratie ). Franz von Sickingen portrayed the leader of the Knights’ Revolt as a heroic, albeit ultimately tragic, revolutionary figure, with the character of Ulrich von Hutten serving as a clear reflection of Lassalle’s own persona. Marx, in his critique, took issue with the play’s focus on a feudal protagonist, its perceived abstract idealism, and its neglect of the crucial role of the peasantry, suggesting that peasant leaders might have provided more relevant figures for such a narrative. The pamphlet concerning the Italian War advocated for Prussian neutrality and the eventual incorporation of Schleswig-Holstein , a stance that diverged significantly from the pro-Austrian , anti-Bonapartist position favored by Marx and Engels. Lassalle later explained to Marx that his objective was not to promote Prussian nationalism, but rather to prevent a “popular war against France,” which he feared would prove “dangerous… for our revolutionary development.” His strategy was to render any war unpopular, thereby weakening the government and ultimately benefiting the revolutionary cause. These ideological disagreements further exacerbated the already strained relationship with Marx, compounded by Lassalle’s handling of Marx’s financial requests and his perceived condescending attitude during a dispute between Marx and Carl Vogt . The mounting tension reached a peak when Marx sent Lassalle copies of Lewy’s 1855 denunciation, an act that deeply wounded Lassalle.

In 1860, Lassalle became involved with Sonia Sontsev (Sophie von Solutzew), a young Russian woman he met at a spa in Aachen . He penned a lengthy, sixty-page letter to her, proposing marriage and outlining his life story, his complex feelings about his Jewish identity (which he described with notable ambivalence), his relationship with Countess Hatzfeldt (whom he hoped Sonia would live with), and the inherent dangers of a political life. Sonia ultimately declined his proposal. His seminal legal work, The System of Acquired Rights (Das System der erworbenen Rechte ), was published in 1861. This philosophical and historical treatise challenged conservative legal theorists like Friedrich Carl von Savigny by arguing that acquired rights could, under certain circumstances, lose their validity. Lassalle posited that legal systems derive their legitimacy from the evolving consciousness of the nation, the Volksgeist, and that new laws reflecting this evolving consciousness could legitimately abrogate older privileges that contradicted it. The reception of the work, however, was notably tepid.

Political agitation and the ADAV

Part of a series on Socialism in Germany

Ideologies • Anarchism • Communism and Marxism • Autonomism • Leninism • Marxism–Leninism • Maoism • Trotskyism • Left communism • Council communism • Orthodox Marxism • Christian socialism • Catholic socialism • Democratic socialism • Eco-socialism • Liberal socialism • Prussian socialism • Revolutionary socialism • Social democracy • Socialist conservatism • State socialism • Strasserism

Principles • Anti-capitalism • Anti-fascism • Anti-imperialism • Environmental justice • Equality • Equality of opportunity • Land reform • Proletariat • Radical democracy • Redistribution • Social corporatism • Social justice • Social market economy • Social security • Solidarity • State intervention

History • March Revolution • Anti-Socialist Laws • Gotha Program • Staatssozialismus • Erfurt Program • November Revolution • Kiel mutiny • Spartacist uprising • Bavarian Soviet Republic • Weimar Constitution • Resistance to Nazism • East Germany • Frankfurt Declaration • Godesberg Program • West German student movement

Intellectuals • Adorno • Benjamin • Brecht • Eisler • Engels • Fromm • Hess • Kautsky • Lassalle • Luxemburg • Mann • Marcuse • Marx • Mühsam • Niekisch • Tillich • Wecker • Zetkin

Politicians • Bebel • Bernstein • Brandt • Dutschke • Ebert • Honecker • Kaiser • Kipping • Klingbeil • Lafontaine • Lauterbach • Liebknecht (Karl) • Liebknecht (Wilhelm) • Müller • Naumann • Pieck • Ramelow • Reichinnek • Schmidt • Schulz • Schumacher • Thälmann • Toller • Ulbricht • Nahles • Wagenknecht

Parties Active • Communist Party of Germany (KPD) • Die Linke • Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance (BSW) • Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) Defunct • Communist Party of Germany (KPD) • General German Workers’ Association (ADAV) • Lassallean General German Workers’ Association (LADAV) • Independent Social Democratic Party of Germany (USPD) • Majority Social Democratic Party of Germany (MSPD) • Old Social Democratic Party of Germany (ASPD) • Social Democratic Workers’ Party of Germany (SDAP) • Socialist Unity Party of Germany (SED) • [Socialist Workers’ Party of Germany](/Socialist_Workers’ Party_of_Germany) (SAPD)

Organisations Active • Friedrich Ebert Foundation • Rosa Luxemburg Foundation Defunct • Antifaschistische Aktion • Black Band • Iron Front • Red Army Faction • Reichsbanner Schwarz-Rot-Gold • Revolutionary Cells • Roter Frontkämpferbund • Ruhr Red Army • Spartacus League

Media Active • Die Tageszeitung • Junge Welt • Neues Deutschland Defunct • Badisches Volksecho • Bauern Echo • Deutsche Volkszeitung • Nachrichten

Related topics • Anti-Germans • Antifa • Fantifa • Frankfurt School • History of the Social Democratic Party of Germany • Three Arrows

• Germany portal • Socialism portal • v • t • e

The early 1860s were a period of significant constitutional tension in Prussia, primarily centered around proposed army reforms. Lassalle perceived this political climate as a fertile ground for his own activism. In April 1862, he delivered two highly influential lectures in Berlin: “The Nature of Constitutions” and “The Working Class and its Significance in the Present Age,” the latter later published as The Workers’ Programme (Zur Arbeiterfrage: Lassalle’s Rede bei der am 16. April in Leipzig abgehaltenen Arbeiterversammlung… ). In these addresses, he argued that a constitution was merely a formalization of the existing “factual power relationship in any given society.” He posited that the working class , which he termed the “Fourth Estate,” was destined to become the dominant societal force, driven by its “profound instinct” for the true purpose of the State—to act as an ethical institution fostering human development. He passionately advocated for the working class to establish its own independent political party. Bernstein described The Workers’ Programme as a “paraphrase of the Communist Manifesto , adapted to the time and circumstances,” but also noted that Lassalle’s deep immersion in Hegelianism and his legalistic perspective led him to a “veritable cult” of the state, which he identified as the “Achilles heel of all ideology.” These pronouncements generated considerable public attention, leading to the confiscation of The Workers’ Programme by the police and the initiation of legal charges against Lassalle.

In late 1862, a committee of workers from Leipzig, disillusioned by the German Progress Party ’s refusal to grant them full membership in the German National Association or to support universal suffrage , approached Lassalle, requesting him to lead a new workers’ movement. The historian Gary P. Steenson argues that this nascent movement essentially “made” Lassalle, rather than the other way around; he was sought out by these workers precisely for his intellectual authority and learning, seen as a necessary counterweight to the influence of liberal figures like Franz Hermann Schulze-Delitzsch . Lassalle responded to this overture with his Open Letter to the Central Committee for the Convening of a General German Workers’ Congress in Leipzig (Offenes Antwortschreiben an das Zentralkomitee zur Berufung eines Allgemeinen Deutschen Arbeiter-Kongresses zu Leipzig ) in March 1863. In this seminal document, he reiterated the perceived impotence of the Progressives and laid out his political program: the formation of an independent workers’ party championing the principles of universal, equal, and direct suffrage. He famously critiqued Schulze-Delitzsch’s emphasis on self-help cooperatives as fundamentally inadequate, proposing instead state-financed producers’ cooperatives as the viable path forward. Furthermore, he expounded his theory of the “iron law of wages ,” asserting that under the prevailing capitalist system, average wages inevitably gravitate towards the bare minimum required for subsistence. He concluded that only through state intervention and the exercise of universal suffrage could the working class achieve genuine emancipation.

The Open Letter quickly became the foundational document for the General German Workers’ Association (ADAV). This organization was officially established in Leipzig on May 23, 1863, with Lassalle elected as its president for a five-year term. The ADAV holds the distinction of being the first formally organized political party for German workers. The statutes of the party vested its president with dictatorial powers, a characteristic that would be inherited by Lassalle’s successors as a lasting part of his organizational “legacy.” His leadership style was distinctly that of a demagogue , prioritizing charismatic appeal and decisive action over the more collaborative methods of a democratic leader. His conceptualization of democracy was rooted in a somewhat nebulous, Jacobin -inspired notion of the collective will, rather than a strict adherence to representative institutions. Lacking the patience for meticulous organizational tasks, he excelled as a public speaker and agitator, relying heavily on his existing base of support. Despite his efforts, recruitment proved to be a slow process; by the time of his death, the ADAV numbered only around 4,600 members.

Otto von Bismarck . The shrewd Prussian statesman who saw an opportunity in Lassalle’s movement.

The period was also marked by Lassalle’s pronounced hostility towards liberalism, which led him into a series of confidential meetings and an extensive correspondence with Otto von Bismarck , the formidable Prussian Minister President . Their first encounter, initiated by Bismarck himself, took place in May 1863. Bismarck’s strategic aim was to leverage the emerging workers’ movement to undermine and ultimately crush liberal opposition within Prussia. Lassalle, on his part, hoped to persuade Bismarck to implement universal suffrage, believing that such a reform would serve the interests of both the Crown and the working class, thereby counterbalancing the influence of the bourgeoisie. He even went so far as to suggest that the working class might be amenable to supporting a “social dictatorship” wielded by the Crown against bourgeois society. According to one interpretation, in the final months of his life, Lassalle began to moderate his revolutionary socialist aims, focusing instead on securing concessions from the government, opting for “the simpler and rapider method of converting Bismarck and the Prussian Ministry.” The precise details of their discussions remained shrouded in secrecy, but Lassalle’s overtures to the conservative state, coupled with his evident nationalist sentiments, were viewed with considerable suspicion by Marx and other socialist thinkers. His relationship with Marx had irrevocably broken down by November 1862, stemming from a misunderstanding concerning a loan.

Lassalle continued his vigorous agitation throughout 1863 and 1864, delivering powerful speeches in cities such as Frankfurt and Ronsdorf . His pamphlet Herr Bastiat-Schulze von Delitzsch, the Economic Julian, Or Capital and Labour (1864) presented a scathing polemical attack on Schulze-Delitzsch. Paradoxically, this work also significantly contributed to the popularization of Marxian concepts related to capital and labor, inadvertently preparing the ground for the German movement’s eventual embrace of Marxism. He faced ongoing legal challenges; he was convicted for The Workers’ Programme (though his sentence was commuted to a fine) and later for his Ronsdorf speech (for which he received a prison sentence, pending appeal). During his trial for high treason in March 1864, Lassalle publicly predicted that Bismarck would emulate the actions of Robert Peel and introduce universal suffrage within a year. In June 1864, shortly before departing Berlin, Lassalle advised his followers that the party should identify the bourgeoisie as “the only enemy” and be prepared to form an alliance with the monarchy if circumstances demanded it.

Final year and death

Helene von Dönniges. The young woman at the center of the tragic duel that ended Lassalle’s life.

In the summer of 1864, Lassalle sought rest and recuperation at a health spa in Rigi Kaltbad , Switzerland. It was there that he re-encountered Helene von Dönniges, a young woman he had met briefly on a previous occasion. Helene was the daughter of Wilhelm von Dönniges, a diplomat representing Bavaria . A passionate and whirlwind romance quickly developed, culminating in Lassalle’s proposal of marriage. Helene accepted, writing to him with poetic fervor: “I intend to be your wife. You asked me for a ‘yes et je m’en charge’. Here is my ‘yes’, chargez-vous.”

However, Helene’s family, particularly her father, vehemently opposed the union. Their objections stemmed from Lassalle’s Jewish origins, his controversial political notoriety, and what they perceived as a significant social mismatch. When Helene returned to her family in Geneva , she was effectively held captive and subjected to intense pressure to renounce Lassalle. Lassalle, now in Geneva, made strenuous efforts to secure her release and gain her parents’ consent. He enlisted the help of Countess Hatzfeldt and other allies, even seeking the intervention of Bavarian authorities through his acquaintance, Baron von Schrenk.

After weeks of intense emotional turmoil, during which Lassalle dispatched a barrage of frantic letters and telegrams, Helene ultimately succumbed to her family’s pressure. She penned a letter to Lassalle renouncing him and indicating her preference for a previous suitor, Yanko von Rakowitza , a young Wallachian nobleman. Bernstein described Lassalle during this period as having a “completely shattered” nervous system, exhibiting “extreme weakness” through his “anxiety to move heaven and earth about every petty matter.” Feeling his honor severely impugned and publicly humiliated, Lassalle issued a challenge to a duel to Helene’s father. Herr von Dönniges declined the challenge, but Rakowitza accepted it in his stead.

Lassalle’s death mask . A poignant reminder of a life cut tragically short.

The duel took place on the morning of August 28, 1864, in Carouge , a suburb of Geneva. Lassalle possessed minimal experience with pistols, while Rakowitza, though not an exceptional marksman, had spent the preceding afternoon engaged in intensive pistol practice. Rakowitza fired first, striking Lassalle in the abdomen. Lassalle’s return shot went wide. Lassalle lingered for three days, heavily sedated with opium , and ultimately passed away on the morning of August 31, 1864, at the age of thirty-nine.

Lassalle’s death sent shockwaves through the political landscape. The ADAV, suddenly deprived of its founder and charismatic leader, plunged into a period of “violent dissension over policy, organisation, and leadership” that threatened its very existence. His body was embalmed, and Countess Hatzfeldt accompanied it in a solemn procession down the Rhine , where vast throngs of workers gathered to mourn him. He was eventually laid to rest in the Jewish Cemetery in Breslau . Countess Hatzfeldt dedicated the remainder of her life (until her death in 1881) to defending Lassalle’s memory and cultivating a devoted following, almost a cult of personality, within and beyond the ADAV. Helene von Dönniges married Yanko von Rakowitza, who tragically died a few months later; she subsequently married two more times and pursued a career on the stage, eventually dying by suicide.

Legacy

While Marx and Engels acknowledged Lassalle’s significant contributions, their assessments were often tinged with criticism. Engels lamented the loss of “one of the most important men in Germany,” yet Marx, in private correspondence, expressed a sense of relief that their strained personal relationship had concluded. He strongly condemned Lassalle’s political tactics, alleged plagiarism of his writings, and what he perceived as Lassalle’s excessive “vanity, braggadocio.” Marx also firmly believed that Lassalle’s concept of state socialism represented a fundamental misunderstanding of his own theoretical framework. The followers and intellectual heirs of Marx and Lassalle would continue to hold divergent views on their respective theories. Eduard Bernstein , for instance, argued that the differences were primarily tactical and political, whereas Karl Kautsky maintained that Lassalle’s socialism represented a fundamentally distinct ideological current.

A poster depicting Lassalle triumphantly destroying the “golden calf ” of capital, circa 1870.

Despite its relatively small membership at the time of Lassalle’s death, the ADAV experienced growth under the leadership of Johann Baptist von Schweitzer , who perpetuated Lassalle’s emphasis on “centralised organisation, nationalistic outlook, and pro-governmental tactics.” In 1875, the ADAV merged with the Social Democratic Workers’ Party (founded by August Bebel and Wilhelm Liebknecht ) at the Gotha Congress, forming the precursor to what would eventually become the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD). The Gotha Program adopted by the newly formed party bore the distinct imprint of Lassallean theories, notably reaffirming the demand for state-aided cooperatives, a provision that was maintained “despite strong private opposition from Marx.”

Ferdinand Lassalle remains a figure of considerable controversy and historical debate. He is widely credited with popularizing socialist ideas among the German working class and with establishing their first organized political entity. His strategic emphasis on achieving socialism through the existing state apparatus via universal suffrage, his nationalist leanings, and his controversial dealings with Bismarck fundamentally distinguished his approach from that of Marxism. The influence of “Lassalleanism,” including a pronounced antagonism towards liberalism, continued to be a significant ideological current within German socialism long after his death. Even prominent figures like Liebknecht and Bebel found it necessary to acknowledge Lassalle’s considerable prestige; in 1868, for example, Liebknecht edited an article by Engels specifically to remove passages that were disparaging towards Lassalle. The enduring persistence of his ideas and the almost cult-like reverence that surrounded his personality demonstrated that, for many German workers, Lassalle’s doctrines were not perceived as incompatible with those of Marx; indeed, one party publication in 1872 even depicted Marx and Lassalle standing on either side of Liebknecht.

Engels later eloquently described Lassalle’s “immortal service” as having “re-awakened the workers’ movement in Germany after fifteen years of slumber,” while simultaneously maintaining that his historical significance remained “equivocal,” with “Lassalle the socialist… accompanied step by step by Lassalle the demagogue.” Bernstein concluded that although Lassalle’s immediate agitational goals may not have been fully realized, “it brought the working-class nearer to the goal… to have trained them for the fight, to have, as the song says, given them swords, this remains the great, the undying merit of Ferdinand Lassalle.”

Works

German editions

Die Philosophie Herakleitos des Dunklen von Ephesos (The Philosophy of Heraclitus the Obscure of Ephesus). Berlin: Franz Duncker, 1858.
Der italienische Krieg und die Aufgabe Preussens: eine Stimme aus der Demokratie (The Italian War and the Tasks of Prussia: A Voice of Democracy). Berlin: Franz Duncker, 1859.
Das System der erworbenen Rechte (The System of Acquired Rights). Two volumes. Leipzig: 1861.
Über Verfassungswesen: zwei Vorträge und ein offenes Sendschreiben (On The Essence of a Constitution: Two Lectures and an Open Letter). Berlin: 1862.
Offenes Antwortschreiben an das Zentralkomitee zur Berufung eines Allgemeinen Deutschen Arbeiter-Kongresses zu Leipzig (Open Letter Answering the Central Committee on the Convening of a General German Workers’ Congress in Leipzig). Zürich: Meyer and Zeller, 1863.
Zur Arbeiterfrage: Lassalle’s Rede bei der am 16. April in Leipzig abgehaltenen Arbeiterversammlung nebst Briefen der Herren Professoren Wuttke und Dr. Lothar Bucher. (On the Labor Problem: Lassalle’s Speech on the 16th of April [1863] at a Leipzig Workers’ Meeting, Together with the Letters of Professor Wuttke and Dr. Lothar Bucher). Leipzig: 1863.
Herr Bastiat-Schulze von Delitzsch, der ökonomische Julian, oder Kapital und Arbeit (Mr. Bastiat-Schulze von Delitzsch, the Economic Julian, or, Capital and Labour). Berlin: Reinhold Schlingmann, 1864.
Reden und Schriften (Speeches and Writings). In three volumes. New York: Wolff and Höhne, n.d. [1883].
Gesammelte Reden und Schriften (Collected Speeches and Writings). In 12 volumes. Berlin: P. Cassirer, 1919–1920.
- vol. 1 | vol. 2 | vol. 3 | vol. 4 | vol. 5 | vol. 6 | vol. 7 | vol. 8 | vol. 9 | vol. 10 | vol. 11 | vol. 12

English translations

The Working Man’s Programme: An Address. Edward Peters, trans. London: The Modern Press, 1884.
What is Capital? F. Keddell, trans. New York: New York Labor News Co., 1900.
Lassalle’s Open Letter to the National Labor Association of Germany. John Ehmann and Fred Bader, trans. New York: International Library Publishing, 1901. Originally published in US in 1879.
Franz von Sickingen: A Tragedy in Five Acts. Daniel DeLeon, trans. New York: New York Labor News, 1904.
Voices of Revolt, Volume 3: Speeches of Ferdinand Lassalle with a Biographical Sketch. Introduction by Jakob Altmaier. New York: International Publishers, 1927.