QUICK FACTS
Created Jan 0001
Status Verified Sarcastic
Type Existential Dread
Keywords
world war ii, improve it, discuss these issues, verification, improve this article, find sources, copyright attribution

German Occupation Of Norway

“This article, much like a poorly maintained antique, presents with a few
 structural eccentricities. Assistance is required to improve it or, if you prefer the...”

Contents
  • 1. Overview
  • 2. Etymology
  • 3. Cultural Impact

Part of World War II

This article, much like a poorly maintained antique, presents with a few
 structural eccentricities. Assistance is required to improve it or, if you prefer the path of least resistance, to merely discuss these issues on the designated talk page. Consider it a public service, if nothing else. (One might even learn how and when to remove these messages ).

Further complicating matters, this narrative requires additional substantiation for verification . Should you feel compelled to improve this article , do so by adding citations to reliable sources . Otherwise, any material lacking proper sourcing may find itself unceremoniously challenged and subsequently removed. One can, of course, find sources : “German occupation of Norway” – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (August 2009). (The path to understanding how and when to remove this message remains open).

Should the spirit of expansion seize you, this article can benefit from text translated from its corresponding Norwegian counterpart. (September 2017). For those who require important translation instructions, a simple “show” will reveal them.

  • You may also opt to view a machine-translated version of the Norwegian article, if you enjoy interpretive dance in textual form.
  • Machine translation tools, such as DeepL or Google Translate, are often a useful, if imperfect, initial foray into translation. However, true translators understand the necessity of revising errors and confirming accuracy, rather than merely copy-pasting the digital equivalent of a fever dream into English Wikipedia.
  • A word of caution: do not translate text that appears unreliable or of low quality. Where possible, verify the information with references provided within the foreign-language article itself.
  • It is imperative that you provide copyright attribution within the edit summary accompanying your translation. This is achieved by including an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. An exemplary attribution edit summary might read: “Content in this edit is translated from the existing Norwegian Wikipedia article at [[:no:Norge under andre verdenskrig]]; see its history for attribution.”
  • Furthermore, you might consider adding the template {{Translated|no|Norge under andre verdenskrig}} to the talk page .
  • For more comprehensive guidance, consult Wikipedia:Translation .

(And yes, this also explains how and when to remove this message ).

A stark image: German officers standing stoically in front of the National Theatre in Oslo , 1940. A scene that would have been unthinkable just months prior, now a grim reality.

Denmark

Finland

Iceland

  • Fork

Norway

The occupation of Norway by Nazi Germany during the Second World War commenced with chilling precision on 9 April 1940, following the swift and brutal execution of Operation WeserĂŒbung . What little conventional armed resistance Norway could muster against the initial German invasion sputtered out by 10 June 1940. From that point, the machinery of Nazi Germany tightened its grip on the nation, maintaining control until the inevitable, if belated, capitulation of German forces in Europe on 8 May 1945 .

Throughout this five-year period of subjugation, a collaborationist, pro-German administration, grandly christened Den nasjonale regjering (’the National Government’), ostensibly governed Norway. Meanwhile, the legitimate Norwegian monarch, King Haakon VII , and his pre-war government had prudently sought refuge in London , where they established a resilient government in exile . The true reins of civil power, however, were effectively wielded by the Reichskommissariat Norwegen (Reich Commissariat of Norway), an entity that worked in uncomfortable, often brutal, collaboration with the aforementioned pro-German puppet government. This grim chapter of military occupation is, in Norway, remembered with a stark simplicity, referred to variously as the “war years,” the “occupation period,” or, with a weary sigh, simply “the war.”

Background

Having managed the rather impressive feat of maintaining its neutrality throughout the entirety of the First World War (1914–1918), Norway’s foreign and military policy from 1933 onwards became rather predictably entangled with three primary influences. One might even call them anchors, dragging the nation towards a perilous complacency.

Firstly, there was the pervasive push for fiscal austerity , championed with unyielding conviction by fiscally conservative political factions. Their logic, as ever, was simple: why spend on defense when peace is so much cheaper?

Secondly, pacifism found a powerful advocate in the Norwegian Labour Party . A noble ideal, perhaps, but one that often proves tragically incompatible with the realities of burgeoning global conflict. Their belief in the power of non-aggression, while admirable in theory, left Norway ill-prepared for the storm that was brewing.

Finally, a deeply ingrained doctrine of neutrality permeated the national consciousness. The underlying, and ultimately fatal, assumption was that Norway would somehow be spared the ravages of war if it simply remained aloof and unaligned. A quaint notion, really, that the powerful would respect the wishes of the small.

These three factors, a rather potent cocktail of wishful thinking and financial pragmatism, inevitably faced mounting resistance as tensions across Europe spiraled throughout the 1930s. Initially, the dissent came from within the ranks of Norwegian military personnel and various right-wing political groups, who, one presumes, possessed a more grounded understanding of geopolitical realities. However, as the decade wore on, a growing unease began to ripple through the mainstream political establishment. And, as history has since revealed, even the monarch, King Haakon VII , was not content to remain a passive observer, engaging in discreet, behind-the-scenes efforts to alter the nation’s course. By the twilight of the 1930s, the Norwegian parliament, the Storting , had, with a visible shift in sentiment, finally acknowledged the undeniable need for a strengthened military. Budgets were expanded accordingly, even necessitating the assumption of national debt. A commendable, if belated, realization. As fate would have it, however, most of the ambitious plans enabled by this budgetary surge were not brought to fruition in time to avert the impending catastrophe. One might say, the universe has a rather dark sense of timing.

Pre-war relations with Britain

Despite the unwavering commitment to neutrality being the declared highest priority, a quiet understanding permeated the upper echelons of government: Norway, above all else, harbored no desire to find itself at war with Britain . This unspoken preference, a pragmatic recognition of maritime power and historical ties, underscored much of their diplomatic maneuvering. On 28 April 1939, Nazi Germany , with its characteristic theatricality, extended offers of non-aggression pacts to Norway and several other Nordic nations. Predictably, and in a futile attempt to maintain its cherished neutrality, Norway, in solidarity with Sweden and Finland , politely declined the German overture.

By the autumn of 1939, a palpable sense of urgency began to settle over the nation. Norway’s extensive western coastline, a strategic gateway to the vital shipping lanes of the North Sea and the North Atlantic Ocean , rendered its position precariously exposed. It became increasingly clear that merely protecting its neutrality would not suffice; Norway would, in all likelihood, be forced to actively fight for its very freedom and independence. Efforts to bolster military readiness and capability, alongside measures to sustain a protracted blockade, were intensified with a newfound, if desperate, vigor between September 1939 and April 1940.

Several incidents occurring within Norwegian maritime waters served to severely strain Norway’s already fragile capacity to assert its neutrality. Most notably, the infamous Altmark incident in JĂžssingfjord provided a stark demonstration of how little regard belligerent powers held for neutral sovereignty. Despite these provocations, Norway somehow managed to navigate the treacherous diplomatic waters, negotiating surprisingly favorable trade treaties with both the United Kingdom and Germany . However, it became glaringly apparent that both major warring powers harbored an acute strategic interest in denying the other access to Norway’s coastline and its crucial resources.

The Norwegian government also found itself under increasing pressure from Britain to divert ever-larger portions of its considerable merchant fleet to transport British goods, often at rates that were anything but lucrative, and to actively participate in the trade blockade against Germany . These demands, while understandable from an Allied perspective, placed Norway in an increasingly untenable position. In March and April 1940, British plans for an invasion of Norway were meticulously drawn up. The primary objective, a rather transparent one, was to reach and disable the critical Swedish iron ore mines located in GĂ€llivare . The Allied strategists optimistically hoped that this move would effectively divert German forces away from the inevitable, brutal conflict in France and, perhaps, open a new war front in southern Sweden .

The British plan, code-named Operation Wilfred , involved the controversial placement of naval mines within Norwegian waters. This mining operation was intended to be immediately followed by the landing of Allied troops at four key Norwegian ports: Narvik , Trondheim , Bergen , and Stavanger . The underlying hope, a rather cynical one, was that the mining would provoke a swift and agitated German reaction, thereby providing the Allies with the necessary pretext for an immediate military response. However, due to internal Anglo-French disagreements and bureaucratic delays, the scheduled date for the mining operation was postponed from 5 April to 8 April.

Unbeknownst to the Allies, or perhaps ignored in their own strategic calculations, Adolf Hitler had already issued his own directive on 1 April, ordering the German invasion of Norway to commence on 9 April. Thus, on 8 April, while the Norwegian government was deeply engrossed in drafting earnest, albeit ultimately futile, protests concerning the Allied mine-laying, the German expeditionary forces were already in motion, their invasion fleets mobilizing with silent, deadly efficiency. The stage was set for a confrontation Norway was tragically unprepared to face.

German invasion

See also: Operation WeserĂŒbung and Norwegian Campaign

A grim tableau unfolds: German infantry advancing through a burning Norwegian village, April 1940. King Haakon and crown prince Olav are seen seeking refuge as the German Luftwaffe relentlessly bombs in Molde , April 1940. German troops make their entrance into Oslo, May 1940. In the background looms the Victoria Terrasse , a structure that would soon become the chilling headquarters of the Gestapo . These images paint a vivid, if tragic, picture of a nation caught utterly by surprise.

Soon after the British and French had, with debatable foresight, mined the Norwegian coast in a rather desperate attempt to disrupt vital iron ore shipments, Germany launched its own invasion of Norway. The motives, as always, were multifaceted, a tangle of strategic necessity and ideological posturing:

  • Strategically: The primary objective was to secure ice-free harbors along the Norwegian coast. From these coveted bases, German naval forces could extend their reach, seeking to exert control over the vast expanse of the North Atlantic . A clear path to projection of power.
  • Resource Control: To ensure the uninterrupted availability of crucial iron ore from mines in Sweden . This was the lifeblood of the German war machine, and its supply could not be jeopardized.
  • Pre-emption: To thwart a perceived imminent British and French invasion aimed at the very same strategic objectives. A classic move in the game of war: strike first to prevent being struck.
  • Propaganda: To bolster the grand, if delusional, narrative of a burgeoning “Germanic empire.” The conquest of a fellow Nordic nation, however brutal, played into the racial fantasies of the Third Reich.

Through a rather astonishing combination of neglect and misjudgment on the part of both the Norwegian foreign minister Halvdan Koht and Minister of Defence Birger Ljungberg , Norway found itself woefully unprepared for the German military invasion that descended upon it during the night of 8–9 April 1940. Adding insult to injury, a major storm on 7 April had conveniently ensured that the British Navy failed to make any meaningful contact with the advancing German invasion fleet, leaving the Norwegians even more isolated. Consistent with the brutal efficiency of Blitzkrieg warfare, German forces attacked Norway simultaneously by sea and air as Operation WeserĂŒbung roared into action.

The initial wave of German attackers, numbering a mere 10,000 men, seemed almost laughably small for such an ambitious undertaking. German ships steamed confidently into the Oslofjord , only to be met by a defiant, and utterly unexpected, resistance. The formidable Krupp -built artillery and torpedoes of Oscarsborg Fortress unleashed a devastating barrage, sinking the German flagship BlĂŒcher and either sinking or severely damaging other vessels in the German task force. This single act of defiance was a pivotal moment. The BlĂŒcher was carrying the crucial forces intended to swiftly seize control of Norway’s political apparatus. Its sinking, and the loss of over 1,000 German soldiers and crew, bought precious time for the King and his government, allowing them to escape from Oslo and prevent a complete collapse of legitimate authority. In other cities targeted by the invasion, however, the Germans encountered only weak or, in some cases, virtually no resistance. The sheer element of surprise, coupled with Norway’s profound lack of preparedness for an invasion of this scale, proved decisive in the initial German successes.

The major Norwegian ports, stretching from Oslo northward to Narvik (a staggering 1,200 miles (1,900 km) from Germany’s naval bases), were swiftly occupied by advance detachments of German troops, transported with audacious speed on destroyers. Simultaneously, a single parachute battalion seized control of the Oslo and Stavanger airfields, while a formidable fleet of 800 operational aircraft quickly overwhelmed the Norwegian population, rendering any organized aerial defense impossible. Norwegian resistance at Narvik , Trondheim (Norway’s second city and, crucially, the strategic key to Norway), Bergen , Stavanger , and Kristiansand was overcome with chilling rapidity. Oslo’s initial, albeit effective, resistance to the seaborne forces was nullified when German troops, having landed at the airfield, marched brazenly into the city. The first occupying forces entered the capital with a chilling display of confidence, marching behind a German military brass band – a theatrical gesture of conquest. A mere 1,500 paratroopers were involved in the swift takeover of the Norwegian capital, a testament to the element of surprise and the disarray of the defenders.

Once secure footholds were established in Oslo and Trondheim, the Germans initiated a relentless ground offensive, pushing inland against scattered pockets of Norwegian resistance. Allied forces, attempting several counterattacks, found their efforts consistently rebuffed and ultimately failed. While the military success of the Norwegian resistance in these early stages was limited, it achieved a profoundly significant political victory: it bought enough time for the Norwegian government, including the royal family , to escape the clutches of the invaders. The sinking of the BlĂŒcher in the Oslofjord on the very first day of the invasion, carrying the main forces intended to occupy the capital, was instrumental in this escape. Furthermore, an improvised defense at Midtskogen also successfully prevented a German raid from capturing the king and his government, a close call that preserved the continuity of Norwegian sovereignty.

Norwegian mobilization efforts were severely hampered by a cascade of unfortunate circumstances. Much of the best military equipment was lost to the Germans within the first 24 hours of the invasion, a crippling blow. The government’s mobilization order itself was unclear and inconsistent, adding to the prevailing chaos. This, combined with the tremendous psychological shock inflicted by the sudden, brutal German surprise attack, created an environment of widespread confusion. Despite these setbacks, the Norwegian Army did manage to rally after the initial disarray, and on several occasions, put up a stiff, determined fight, successfully delaying the German advance. However, the Germans, swiftly reinforced by superior Panzer and motorized machine gun battalions, proved to be an unstoppable force due to their overwhelming numerical superiority, rigorous training, and advanced equipment. Recognizing the futility of a direct, sustained engagement, the Norwegian Army strategically planned its campaign as a tactical retreat, desperately awaiting reinforcements from Britain .

The British Navy , demonstrating its formidable maritime power, cleared the way to Narvik on 13 April, sinking one submarine and eight destroyers within the fjord in a decisive action. British and French troops began to land at Narvik on 14 April, signaling a coordinated Allied response. Shortly thereafter, British forces also landed at Namsos and Åndalsnes , with the strategic intent to attack Trondheim from the north and from the south , respectively. The Germans, however, proved quick to adapt, landing fresh troops in the rear of the British forces at Namsos and advancing relentlessly up the Gudbrandsdal valley from Oslo against the Allied contingent at Åndalsnes. By this point, the German forces in Norway had swelled to approximately 25,000 men, a significant and rapidly growing presence.

By 23 April, the grim reality of the situation had set in, and open discussions commenced regarding the necessity of evacuating Allied troops. The decision was formalized on 26 April, when the British command resolved to withdraw from Norway. By 2 May, both Namsos and Åndalsnes had been successfully evacuated by the British forces, leaving Norwegian pockets of resistance increasingly isolated. On 5 May, the last remaining Norwegian resistance pockets in South and Central Norway were finally overcome, defeated at Vinjesvingen and Hegra Fortress .

In the far north, German troops were engaged in a protracted and brutal struggle at the Battle of Narvik . Despite holding out against a numerically superior force, five times their number in British and French troops, they were on the verge of surrender before finally managing to slip out of Narvik on 28 May. Moving eastwards, the Germans were met with an unexpected development: the British began to abandon Narvik on 3 June. By this time, the German offensive in France had progressed with such devastating speed and success that the British government could no longer afford any significant military commitment in Norway. Consequently, the 25,000 British and French soldiers, who had just achieved a hard-won victory at Narvik, were evacuated a mere 10 days after their triumph. King Haakon VII and a portion of his government departed for England aboard the British cruiser HMS Glasgow, establishing the Norwegian government-in-exile and ensuring the continuity of Norwegian sovereignty.

Fighting, a desperate and dwindling affair, continued in Northern Norway until 10 June. On this day, the Norwegian 6th Division finally surrendered, a decision made shortly after all Allied forces had been evacuated, against the stark backdrop of the looming and undeniable defeat in France. Among all the German-occupied territories in Western Europe , this meant Norway had managed to withstand the German invasion for the longest period of time – approximately two months. A small, cold comfort in the face of overwhelming defeat.

For the remainder of the war, a formidable force of approximately 300,000 German soldiers remained garrisoned in Norway. By securing Norway, Hitler had not only ensured the continued, vital supply of iron ore from Sweden but had also gained invaluable naval and air bases from which to launch strikes against Britain , further complicating the Allied war effort.

Occupation

German political and military powers

See also: Reichskommissariat Norwegen and Quisling regime

A revealing snapshot from 1941: Heinrich Himmler on a visit to Norway. Seated, from left to right, are Quisling , Himmler himself, Terboven , and General Nikolaus von Falkenhorst , the commanding officer of the German forces stationed in Norway. A gathering of the architects of occupation.

Even before the invasion, in a series of rather desperate and self-serving attempts on 14 and 18 December 1939, Vidkun Quisling , the rather ambitious leader of Norway’s fledgling fascist party, the Nasjonal Samling (“National Gathering”), had sought to ingratiate himself with Adolf Hitler . His overtures aimed to persuade Hitler that he, Quisling, was the ideal candidate to form a government that would wholeheartedly support the occupying Germans. While Hitler initially remained unimpressed and unreceptive to Quisling’s rather transparent ambitions, he nevertheless issued orders to draft contingency plans for a potential military invasion of Norway.

Thus, on the very first day of the invasion, Quisling, acting entirely on his own initiative and with a flair for the dramatic, burst into the NRK studios in Oslo on 9 April. At 7:30 pm, he made a nationwide broadcast, unilaterally declaring himself prime minister and issuing an immediate order for all Norwegian resistance to cease. This grand pronouncement, however, did not sit well with the German authorities, who, in their initial calculations, had preferred for the legitimate Norwegian government to remain in place, thereby lending a veneer of legality to their invasion. Nevertheless, when it became glaringly obvious that the Storting would not capitulate, the Germans swiftly, if reluctantly, moved to recognize Quisling. Hitler, apparently unaware of any more suitable candidate at such short notice, extended his support to Quisling from the evening of 9 April. They then demanded that King Haakon formally appoint Quisling as prime minister and recall his government to Oslo, effectively providing a legal imprimatur to the ongoing invasion.

When the German ambassador to Norway, Curt BrĂ€uer , presented his government’s demands to King Haakon, the monarch responded with a resolute clarity: he would abdicate before ever appointing Quisling as prime minister. The Germans, in a display of their characteristic brutality and disregard for civilian life, reacted by bombing the village they mistakenly believed the King was occupying. He had been there, but had, with a stroke of luck, departed the village just as the ominous drone of bombers became audible. Standing in the snow of a nearby wood, he watched as the village of Nybergsund was utterly destroyed. This act of terror only served to solidify the Norwegian government’s resolve, prompting them to unanimously advise the King against appointing any government led by Quisling. The invaders, realizing that Quisling’s party commanded no significant popular support, quickly sidelined him.

Consequently, an administrative council , headed by Ingolf Elster Christensen , was established on 15 April. Its mandate was to administer those areas that had, by then, fallen under German control. This interim council was ultimately abolished on 20 September 1940, when Reichskommissar Josef Terboven seized absolute power, forming his own cabinet and effectively becoming the supreme authority in occupied Norway. Terboven, ever the pragmatist, attempted to negotiate an arrangement with the remaining members of the Norwegian parliament, hoping to bestow a semblance of legitimacy upon his Nazi cabinet. These talks, however, predictably failed.

The Parliament of Norway Building stands occupied in 1941, a potent symbol of a nation under foreign rule.

Quisling, a man seemingly incapable of staying out of the spotlight, was subsequently re-instituted as head of state on 20 February 1942. However, this was a hollow victory. Terboven, the true power, retained the sole prerogative to employ violence as a political instrument, a power he wielded with chilling frequency and ruthlessness. His actions included, but were not limited to, imposing martial law in Trondheim and, in a particularly egregious act of collective punishment, ordering the complete destruction of the village of TelavĂ„g . Quisling, in his deluded optimism, genuinely believed that by ensuring economic stability and acting as a mediator between Norwegian civilian society and the German occupiers, his party would gradually earn the trust and confidence of the Norwegian population. While membership in the Nasjonal Samling did see a modest increase in the initial years of the occupation, it never reached truly significant levels, and indeed, began to erode notably towards the end of the war, a testament to the Norwegian people’s enduring contempt for collaboration.

Military forces, such as the Army Norway (part of the Heer ) and the Luftwaffe , remained under the direct, unwavering command of the Oberkommando der Wehrmacht in Germany throughout the entire conflict. However, all other governmental authority was firmly vested in the Reich commissioner, Terboven, who ruled with an iron fist. The Nazi authorities made concerted efforts to enact legislation that would legitimize their actions and policies. This included banning all political parties except the Nasjonal Samling, appointing local leaders from the top down, and coercing labor unions and other organizations to accept NS-appointed leadership. Despite widespread resistance to most of the Nazi government’s policies, there was, perhaps surprisingly, considerable cooperation in maintaining economic activity and administering social welfare programs, a grim necessity for a population under occupation.

Members of the Norwegian collaborationist government pose in May 1941, an assembly of individuals who chose convenience over conscience.

Norway became, quite remarkably, the most heavily fortified country during the war. Several hundred thousand German soldiers were stationed there, creating an astonishing ratio of one German soldier for every eight Norwegians. Most German soldiers, one can assume, considered themselves rather fortunate to be assigned to Norway, particularly when contrasted with the savage, soul-destroying combat duty on the Eastern Front . A stark difference, indeed, between occupation and annihilation.

The Schutzstaffel (SS) maintained a formidable presence in Norway throughout the Second World War, numbering approximately six thousand personnel. This force operated under the command of ObergruppenfĂŒhrer Wilhelm Rediess , who served as the Higher SS and Police Leader (HSSPF) from June 1940 until the war’s conclusion. The vast majority of these troops fell under the authority of the Waffen-SS and the broader SS and Police Leader hierarchy. In November 1944, three SS and Police Leaders (SSPFs) were appointed, subordinate to Rediess: SS-OberfĂŒhrer Heinz Roch for Northern Norway, OberfĂŒhrer Richard Kaaserer for Central Norway, and GruppenfĂŒhrer Jakob Sporrenberg for Southern Norway. Also in 1944, the Allgemeine-SS established its 127th SS-Standarte , a peculiar detail given it was the last command of the General-SS ever created, a last gasp of bureaucratic expansion in a dying empire.

The formidable battleship Tirpitz, a veritable “fleet in being” all on its own, was conspicuously stationed in Norway for the majority of the war. Its mere presence served as a potent deterrent, tying up considerable Allied resources and forcing the diversion of significant naval assets, until it was eventually sunk in the last of many relentless attacks. Its existence, even when inactive, was a strategic burden for the Allies.

Economic consequences

The economic repercussions of the German occupation were, to put it mildly, catastrophic. Norway, a nation heavily reliant on international trade, found itself abruptly severed from all its major trading partners the very moment it fell under occupation. While Germany quickly stepped in as the new, dominant trading partner, it proved utterly incapable of compensating for the immense void left by the lost import and export business. The nation’s inherent production capacity largely remained intact, a testament to its industrial foundation. However, the German authorities, with their insatiable appetite for resources, confiscated an extraordinarily large portion of this output, leaving Norway with a mere 43% of its own production for its civilian population.

Combined with a general, and entirely predictable, drop in overall productivity, Norwegians were almost immediately confronted with severe scarcity of basic commodities, including food. The specter of famine, a very real and terrifying possibility, loomed large. In response, many, if not most, Norwegians reverted to a more agrarian existence, diligently growing their own crops and keeping their own livestock. City parks, once recreational spaces, were systematically divided among inhabitants, who transformed them into makeshift vegetable plots, cultivating potatoes, cabbage, and other hardy, resilient vegetables. People began to keep pigs, rabbits, chickens, and other poultry in their houses and out-buildings, a desperate measure born of necessity. Fishing and hunting, once leisure activities for many, became crucial means of survival. The burgeoning gray and black markets stepped in to facilitate the illicit flow of goods, providing a lifeline for those who could afford it, or were bold enough to engage. Norwegians also quickly adapted to the widespread use of ersatz products for a bewildering array of purposes, ranging from ersatz fuel to synthetic coffee, tea, and tobacco. A testament to human ingenuity in the face of scarcity, or perhaps, simply a grim reflection of how far a population can be pushed.

Holocaust and deportation of Jews

Main article: Holocaust in Norway

Anti-Semitic graffiti mars shop windows in Oslo in 1941, an early, chilling indication of the horrors to come.

At the onset of the occupation, Norway was home to at least 2,173 Jews . By the end of the occupation, the numbers tell a stark, brutal story: at least 775 of these individuals were arrested, detained, and subsequently deported. A staggering 742 were systematically murdered in concentration camps , while another 23 perished as a direct result of extrajudicial executions, outright murder, or suicide during the war. This brings the total number of Jewish Norwegian dead to a minimum of 765, representing the complete annihilation of 230 entire households. Beyond the minuscule number who miraculously survived the concentration camps, a fortunate few also managed to escape the country, primarily finding refuge in Sweden , though some also reached the relative safety of the United Kingdom . The chilling efficiency of the Nazi machinery, aided by local collaborators, ensured that a vibrant community was all but extinguished.

Acceptance and collaboration

Main article: Quisling regime

Quisling, ever the eager participant, stands prominently (in front of the center) at a party event in Borre National Park in 1941, positioned beneath a portal that proudly promotes the Germanske SS Norge . A visual testament to his unwavering, if misguided, allegiance.

Of the Norwegians who chose to align themselves with the Nasjonal Samling party, a relatively small fraction were active, enthusiastic collaborators . The most notorious among these was undoubtedly Henry Rinnan , the chillingly effective leader of the Sonderabteilung Lola (known locally, and with a shudder, as Rinnanbanden, or “the Rinnan gang”). This insidious group of informants specialized in infiltrating the Norwegian resistance movement, a tactic that tragically allowed them to capture, torture, and murder many of its dedicated members.

Other significant collaborators included the Statspolitiet (STAPO), a police force that operated with disturbing autonomy from the regular Norwegian police. STAPO maintained close ties to the Quisling regime and, more alarmingly, took direct orders from the German Sicherheitspolizei , effectively becoming an extension of the Nazi security apparatus.

The Hirden represented another facet of collaboration: a fascist paramilitary force composed of party members, directly subordinate to the ruling Nasjonal Samling. The Hirden possessed a broad and rather terrifying mandate that explicitly included the use of violence, which they employed to suppress dissent and enforce the will of the occupation.

Furthermore, a not-insignificant number of Norwegians, approximately 15,000, voluntarily enlisted for combat duty on the Nazi side. Of these, around 6,000 were deployed into active service as part of the Germanic SS , with the vast majority dispatched to the brutal, unforgiving crucible of the Eastern Front . A grim choice, perhaps driven by ideology, opportunism, or desperation.

Resistance movement

The formidable Grini concentration camp served as the internment site for the majority of political prisoners in Norway. A chilling symbol of the occupation’s repressive nature.

Main article: Norwegian resistance movement

As the occupation dragged on, a highly organized and increasingly effective armed resistance movement gradually coalesced. This formidable force, known as Milorg , eventually swelled to some 40,000 armed men by the war’s conclusion. Crucially, it operated under a largely unified command structure, a strategic advantage that would prove invaluable in facilitating the smooth transfer of power in May 1945.

A clear and vital distinction was maintained between the efforts of the home front (Hjemmefronten) and those of the external front (Utefronten). The home front encompassed a diverse array of clandestine activities, including daring sabotage operations, targeted raids, and covert intelligence gathering. These dangerous missions were frequently executed by members of Milorg , while the enigmatic XU organization was specifically founded for the critical task of intelligence collection. Meanwhile, the external front comprised Norway’s resilient merchant fleet , which continued to operate globally, the Royal Norwegian Navy (many of its ships having bravely evacuated to Britain ), Norwegian squadrons integrated into the British Royal Air Force command, and several highly trained commando groups operating with deadly efficiency out of Great Britain and the remote Shetland Islands.

One of the most audacious and strategically significant actions undertaken by the Norwegian resistance was the legendary Norwegian heavy water sabotage . This brilliantly executed operation delivered a crippling blow to the German nuclear energy project , effectively delaying any Nazi ambitions of developing atomic weapons. Prominent resistance members, among them the legendary Max Manus and Gunnar SĂžnsteby , distinguished themselves through numerous acts of sabotage, successfully destroying several ships and vital supply lines belonging to the Kriegsmarine . More radical organizations, such as the Osvald Group , engaged in their own campaigns of disruption, sabotaging a number of trains and railways. However, it is important to note that the majority of resistance organizations, recognizing the overwhelming German presence, opted for a strategy of widespread passive resistance , subtly undermining the occupation from within.

Despite the dangers, illegal newspapers circulated widely, serving as vital conduits of information and morale. These included publications such as Friheten , VĂ„rt Land , and Fritt Land. Illegal trade union periodicals, such as Fri Fagbevegelse, also played a crucial role in maintaining networks of resistance and solidarity.

Exiled Norwegian forces

Main article: Norwegian armed forces in exile

Crown Prince Olav V is seen inspecting Norwegian sailors in the United Kingdom , a symbol of continued sovereignty and resistance abroad.

Approximately 80,000 Norwegian citizens, a substantial portion of the population, fled the country over the course of the war. This exodus included not only political figures and military personnel but also prominent intellectuals, such as the esteemed writer Sigrid Undset . Given that the Norwegian parliament continued to function in exile in Britain , many of these exiles voluntarily enlisted to serve in the Allied military forces. They often formed their own distinct Norwegian units, operating in accordance with the Allied Forces Act . By the time the war concluded, these dedicated forces comprised some 28,000 enlisted men and women, a testament to their unwavering commitment to a free Norway.

In June 1940, a significant portion of the Royal Norwegian Navy – specifically, some 13 warships and 5 aircraft, along with their 500 operating personnel – made the critical decision to follow the King and parliament to Britain . This preserved a vital segment of Norway’s military capability. Throughout the arduous years of the war, a total of some 118 ships proudly served under the banner of the Royal Norwegian Navy, with 58 of these vessels remaining in active service by the war’s conclusion. By that time, the Royal Norwegian Navy had provided continuous and active support to Allied forces since the summer of 1940, a testament to their enduring commitment. Their service, however, came at a heavy cost, suffering the loss of 27 ships and 650 brave men.

Air Force

King Haakon VII is pictured with Norwegian pilots in the United Kingdom , a poignant reminder of the nation’s struggle from afar.

In a concerted effort to develop and train a modern Air Force, a dedicated training camp, affectionately known as “Little Norway ,” was established near Toronto , Canada , on 10 November 1940. However, a truly unified Royal Norwegian Air Force was not formally constituted as a distinct branch of the military of Norway until much later, on 10 November 1944. Prior to this unification, Norwegian airmen operated within two separate branches: the Royal Norwegian Navy Air Service and the Norwegian Army Air Service .

The Air Force, once formally established, operated four distinct squadrons in unwavering support of Allied forces:

Beyond these dedicated Norwegian units, a considerable number of Norwegian volunteers also served with distinction within various British RAF units. Collectively, the Norwegian fighter squadrons (specifically No. 331 and 332) and Norwegian fighters operating under RAF command accounted for an impressive total of 247 enemy aircraft definitively destroyed, with an additional 42 assumed destroyed and 142 damaged. By the culmination of the war, the Norwegian Air Force had grown to a total strength of 2,700 personnel, having tragically suffered 228 losses.

Army

The Norwegian Army, in the hierarchy of exiled Norwegian forces, was unfortunately afforded the lowest priority, a reflection of the strategic realities of the time. Consequently, its numbers never exceeded 4,000 men. Following its last significant reorganization in 1942, the Army was comprised of the following units:

Allied raids in Norway

British troops are seen with Norwegian civilians after the MĂ„lĂžy Raid on 27 December 1941, a rare moment of overt Allied presence on Norwegian soil.

Throughout the entire duration of the war, Allied planners remained acutely aware of Norway’s profound strategic significance. This awareness manifested in a series of daring Commando raids launched at various locations along the Norwegian coast. Some of these operations were designed with the explicit intention of deceiving German commanders, forming a crucial component of the elaborate deception plan known as Operation Fortitude North . Others had the more direct and destructive aim of disrupting German military and scientific capabilities, most notably the audacious sabotage of the German nuclear energy project . Many of these Allied raids were executed with the invaluable assistance and expertise of exiled Norwegian forces, who knew the terrain and the enemy intimately. Indeed, Winston Churchill himself harbored something of an obsession with the idea of a full-scale invasion of Norway, frequently badgering his Chief of the Imperial General Staff, Alanbrooke , about the feasibility of such an undertaking; a plan that eventually materialized, at least on paper, as Operation Jupiter (Norway) .

Notable military operations conducted in Norway include:

Liberation

Lapland War, Soviet advance, and retreat of the German army

See also: Petsamo-Kirkenes Operation

A map vividly illustrates the German army’s retreat from Finland and, shortly thereafter, their desperate withdrawal from Finnmark in northern Norway. Soviet soldiers are depicted meeting local Norwegian inhabitants, a scene of cautious relief. The town of Kirkenes , a testament to the brutal realities of war, was left severely damaged following the calculated withdrawal of German forces.

With the commencement of the German withdrawal from Lapland , the initial German strategy was to tenaciously hold onto the essential nickel mines clustered around Petsamo in the far North, a region then defended by the 19th Mountain Corps under the command of General Ferdinand Jodl . However, rapidly unfolding events on the ground compelled the Oberkommando der Wehrmacht to issue new orders: the entirety of the 20th Mountain Army was to be pulled out of Finland and redeployed to establish new, formidable defensive positions around Lyngen and Skibotn , situated just north of TromsĂž . This new and complex operation was ominously dubbed “Operation Nordlicht ” (Operation Northern Light), and it proved to be a logistical undertaking of truly monumental proportions. General Lothar Rendulic , who had replaced General Eduard Dietl following his tragic death in an air crash, immediately set about the arduous task of evacuating vital supplies by sea, utilizing the ports of Petsamo and the Norwegian town of Kirkenes .

By early October 1944, some 53,000 men of the German 19th Mountain Corps were still entrenched a considerable 45 miles (72 km) inside Russia , holding defensive lines along the Litsa River and the narrow neck of the Rybachy Peninsula . Their ambitious plan was to reach Lakselv in Norway, some 160 miles (260 km) to the west, by 15 November. However, on 7 October, the combined might of the Soviet 14th Army and the Northern fleet , a formidable force of 133,500 men under the command of Field Marshal Kirill Meretskov , launched a devastating attack on the weakest point of the German line: the precarious junction between the 2nd and 6th Mountain Divisions.

Adding to the German predicament, a Soviet Naval Brigade executed a daring amphibious landing to the west of Rybachy, effectively outflanking the already beleaguered German forces. Rendulic, fearing the complete encirclement and annihilation of his troops, issued an immediate order for the 19th Mountain Corps to fall back into Norway. With the relentless Soviets hard on their heels, the Corps managed to reach Kirkenes by 20 October. The German High Command, in a desperate attempt to salvage what they could, ordered Rendulic to hold the Soviets at bay for as long as possible, allowing vital supplies – amounting to some 135,000 short tons (122,000 t) – to be shipped to safety. Five agonizing days later, when the German army finally prepared to withdraw, only a meager 45,000 short tons (41,000 t) had been successfully evacuated. A grim testament to the speed of the Soviet advance and the desperation of the German retreat.

As a direct consequence of the German scorched earth policy, the town of Kirkenes was left virtually obliterated by the Germans before their final departure. The town was systematically set ablaze, its crucial port installations and administrative offices were detonated, and only a handful of small, insignificant houses were left standing amidst the ruins. This devastating scene was to be tragically replayed throughout the entirety of Finnmark , an expansive region larger than Denmark itself. The Germans, acting on Hitler ’s explicit orders to Rendulic, were determined to leave absolutely nothing of value to the advancing Soviets, systematically stripping the area of its inhabitants, shelter, and all essential supplies. Approximately 43,000 people complied with the chilling order to evacuate the region immediately, a mass displacement enforced by the occupiers. Those who dared to refuse were forcibly removed from their homes. Nevertheless, a defiant few chose to remain behind, hiding in the desolate wilderness to await the departure of the Germans. It is estimated that between 23,000 and 25,000 individuals remained in East-Finnmark by the end of November, enduring the harsh arctic winter in caves, makeshift huts constructed from driftwood and/or turf, or even under upturned boats, a testament to their resilience.

The Soviets continued their relentless pursuit of the retreating Germans over the subsequent days, with sporadic but fierce fighting erupting around the small settlements of Munkelv and Neiden to the west of Kirkenes, around 27 October. The German 6th Mountain Division, acting as a disciplined rear-guard, executed a slow, methodical withdrawal up the main coastal road (then known as Riksvei 50, now designated as the E6 ). Their retreat continued until they reached Tanafjord , some 70 miles (110 km) north-west of Kirkenes, which they finally reached on 6 November. This marked their last direct contact with Soviet troops.

However, the Soviet advance inexplicably halted, leaving West-Finnmark and North-Troms as a desolate no-man’s land, a buffer zone between the Soviet army and the retreating German forces. In this brutal, isolated expanse, several thousand people endured the entire winter of 1944/45 in hiding. These resilient individuals, often referred to as “cave people,” sought refuge in natural caves, in crude huts fashioned from driftwood and turf, or beneath boats turned upside down. The constant threat of discovery by patrolling German boats remained a pervasive and terrifying reality throughout the long, dark months spent awaiting liberation.

Exiled Norwegian troops liberate Finnmark

Further information: Liberation of Finnmark

A dinner party in Kirkenes in July 1945, a scene of cautious celebration. Soviet troops had finally withdrawn from Norwegian territory on 25 September 1945. In the background, from right, stand Colonel Arne Dagfin Dahl , Crown Prince Olav , and Commander of Soviet Forces in Norway, Lieutenant General Sherbakov. A snapshot of the complex, bittersweet dawn of liberation.

On 25 October 1944, a crucial order was issued: a Norwegian force stationed in Britain was to set sail for Murmansk to link up with the Soviet forces, who were, by then, making their entry into Northern Norway . This convoy, a beacon of hope, was designated Force 138, and the operation was codenamed “Operation Crofter.”

Under the command of Oberst Arne D. Dahl , the force comprised several vital components:

  • A military mission, entrusted with the critical responsibility of establishing liaison with the Soviets and setting up a provisional civil administration.
  • Bergkompanie 2, a mountain company under Major S. Rongstad, consisting of 233 men, prepared for the harsh northern terrain.
  • A naval area command, staffed by 11 personnel, to coordinate maritime operations.
  • “Area command Finnmark,” a small but crucial unit of 12 men, tasked with local organization.

The force arrived in Murmansk on 6 November and, after a transfer to a Soviet vessel, proceeded to Liinakhamari in the North-western Soviet Union (formerly part of North-eastern Finland ). From there, trucks transported them to Norway, where they finally arrived on 10 November. The Soviet commander, Lieutenant General Sherbakov , made his intentions clear: he wished for the Norwegian Bergkompani to assume forward positions as swiftly as possible. Local volunteers were hastily organized into “guard companies,” armed with Soviet weaponry, pending the arrival of more substantial troop reinforcements from either Sweden or Britain . The first such convoy from Britain arrived on 7 December, bringing with it two Norwegian corvettes (one of which would later be damaged by a mine) and three minesweepers, bolstering the fledgling liberation effort.

It soon became painfully evident that extensive reconnaissance patrols were desperately needed to monitor German activities and ascertain whether the population of Finnmark had, in fact, been fully evacuated. The reports that trickled back painted a grim picture: the Germans were indeed in the process of withdrawing from the Porsanger Peninsula , but they were methodically laying mines and booby-traps in their wake. A few isolated individuals had been left behind here and there, and many of the buildings, once homes and businesses, had been systematically burned to the ground.

This bleak situation persisted into 1945. As the new year dawned, the Norwegian forces began their slow, arduous task of retaking Finnmark. They provided desperately needed assistance to the local population, struggling through the brutal arctic winter, and contended with sporadic German raids launched from the air, sea, and land, all while navigating the ever-present, insidious danger from mines. Reinforcements steadily arrived, both from the Norwegian Rikspoliti based in Sweden and through additional convoys from Britain . A total of 1,442 personnel and 1,225 short tons (1,111 t) of vital material were airlifted into Finnmark by Dakota transport aircraft from Kallax in Sweden. By April, the Norwegian forces had grown to over 3,000 men. Finally, on 26 April, the Norwegian command proudly broadcast the message that Finnmark was free. When the Germans ultimately capitulated on 8 May 1945, the 1st company of the Varanger battalion was strategically positioned along the Finnmark-Troms border, to the west of Alta , standing guard over a liberated, albeit devastated, land.

End of German occupation

See also: Operation Doomsday

A newsreel announces the liberation of Norway, a moment of profound relief after years of subjugation.

Towards the grim conclusion of the war, in March 1945, Norwegian Reichskommissar Josef Terboven entertained rather desperate plans to transform Norway into the last bastion of the Third Reich , envisioning it as a final sanctum for German leaders. One can almost pity the delusion. However, following Adolf Hitler’s suicide on 30 April, Hitler’s chosen successor, Admiral Karl Dönitz , summoned Terboven and General Franz Böhme , the Commander-in-Chief of German forces in Norway, to a fateful meeting in Flensburg . There, they were unequivocally ordered to adhere to the General Headquarters’ instructions regarding capitulation. Upon his return to Norway, General Böhme, a man caught between a crumbling regime and an inevitable defeat, issued a secret directive to his commanders, emphasizing “unconditional military obedience” and “iron discipline.” A last gasp of control in a world spinning out of it.

German forces in Denmark officially surrendered on 5 May. On that same day, General Eisenhower dispatched a telegram to the resistance headquarters in Norway, which was subsequently relayed to General Böhme. This communication contained crucial instructions on how to establish contact with Allied General Headquarters. With only around 30,000 troops at his immediate disposal, General Montgomery made the strategic decision to exclude the surrender of Norway from the May 5 capitulations that covered Denmark, Holland, and northeast Germany. Instead, he tasked Sir Andrew Thorne , GOC-in-C Scottish Command, with the delicate and substantial responsibility of negotiating the surrender of some 350,000 German troops still occupying Norway.

Dönitz, in a final act of the collapsing regime, dismissed Terboven from his post as Reichskommissar on 7 May, transferring his powers to General Böhme. At precisely 21:10 on the same day, the German High Command issued an unambiguous order to Böhme to comply with the capitulation plans. Böhme, in turn, made a radio broadcast at 22:00, declaring that German forces in Norway would obey the orders to surrender. This pivotal announcement triggered an immediate and full mobilization of the Milorg underground resistance movement – more than 40,000 armed Norwegians were swiftly summoned to occupy key strategic locations: the Royal Palace , Oslo’s main police station, and other vital public buildings. A carefully planned Norwegian administration was established overnight, ready to step into the void left by the departing occupiers.

German forces formally surrender Akershus Fortress to Terje Rollem on 11 May 1945, a symbolic handover of power. The Norwegian Royal family, waving to jubilant crowds in Oslo, makes their triumphant return from exile, a moment of profound national catharsis.

The following afternoon, on 8 May, an Allied military mission arrived in Oslo, tasked with delivering the unequivocal conditions for capitulation to the Germans. They meticulously arranged the surrender, which officially took effect at midnight. The terms of capitulation were stringent: they mandated that the German High Command agree to arrest and intern all German and Norwegian Nazi party members identified by the Allies, disarm and intern all SS troops, and meticulously send all German forces to designated assembly areas. Faced with this ignominious defeat, several high-ranking Nazi and SS officials chose the path of suicide rather than surrender. Among those who took their own lives between 8–10 May were Terboven, Rediess, and Roch. At this critical juncture, Norway, a nation with a population barely exceeding three million, was still burdened by the presence of no fewer than 400,000 German soldiers.

Following the formal surrender, detachments of regular Norwegian troops, trained in Sweden , and Allied forces, comprising 30,000 Britons and Americans, were dispatched to Norway. Official representatives of the Norwegian civil authorities swiftly followed these military forces. Crown Prince Olav made his emotional return to Oslo on a British cruiser on 14 May, accompanied by a 21-man delegation of Norwegian government officials, headed by Sverre StĂžstad and Paul Hartmann . The remainder of the Norwegian government and the London-based administration followed shortly thereafter, aboard the UK troopship Andes. Finally, on 7 June , a date that coincidentally marked the 40th anniversary of the dissolution of Norway’s union with Sweden , King Haakon VII and the remaining members of the royal family arrived in Oslo onboard the British cruiser HMS Norfolk. General Sir Andrew Thorne , Commander-in-Chief of Allied forces in Norway, formally transferred power to King Haakon on that very same day, signifying the full restoration of Norwegian sovereignty.

In the wake of liberation, the Norwegian government-in-exile was replaced by a coalition government led by Einar Gerhardsen . This interim administration governed until the autumn of 1945, when the nation held its first postwar general election, which saw Gerhardsen returned as prime minister, now at the helm of a Labour Party government.

As the war concluded, Norwegian survivors began to emerge, often emaciated and traumatized, from the horrors of German concentration camps. By war’s end, a total of 92,000 Norwegians were located abroad, including a significant contingent of 46,000 in Sweden . In addition to the departing German occupiers, Norway found itself hosting 141,000 foreign nationals, the vast majority of whom were now-liberated prisoners of war who had been held by the Germans. Among these, a staggering 84,000 were Russians.

The human cost was immense: a total of 10,262 Norwegians tragically lost their lives in the conflict or while imprisoned. Approximately 50,000 Norwegians endured arrest by the Germans during the occupation. Of these, 9,000 were consigned to brutal prison camps outside Norway, including the infamous Stutthof concentration camp .

Aftermath

Lebensborn and war children

Main articles: Lebensborn and War children

During the five arduous years of occupation, a disturbing reality emerged: several thousand Norwegian women gave birth to children fathered by German soldiers, often as part of the notorious Lebensborn program, which aimed to promote “racially pure” offspring. These mothers, unfortunately, faced severe social ostracization and profound humiliation in the aftermath of the war, not only from the Norwegian officialdom but also from the wider civilian population. They were branded with derogatory labels such as tyskertĂžser (literally, “whores/sluts of the Germans”). Many of these women were subsequently detained in internment camps , such as the one on HovedĂžya , and some were even subjected to the indignity of deportation to Germany . The children born of these unions, the so-called krigsbarn (war children ), were similarly stigmatized, receiving cruel appellations like tyskerunger (children of Germans) or, even worse, naziyngel (Nazi spawn). The debate surrounding the historical treatment of these krigsbarn finally began to emerge with a television series in 1981, but it is only in more recent times that the offspring of these unions have begun to openly identify themselves and seek recognition. Notably, Fritz Moen , the only known victim of a dual miscarriage of justice in Europe, was the child of a Norwegian woman and a German soldier, as was ABBA member Anni-Frid Lyngstad , highlighting the enduring and often painful legacy of these wartime relationships.

Refugees

Norwegian refugees are seen passing through an area cleared in the woods between Norway and Sweden , a testament to their desperate flight for freedom. Refugees, once they reached safety, were often confined to camps where only their most basic needs were met, a stark reality after their perilous journeys.

Throughout the grim war years, a significant number of Norwegians, driven by fear and desperation, fled the oppressive Nazi regime. The majority sought refuge across the border in neighboring Sweden . This diverse group included Norwegian Jews , political activists whose lives were in peril, and countless others who had compelling reasons to fear for their safety and freedom. The Nazis, in an attempt to stem this tide, established formidable border patrols to interdict these flights across the very long and often porous border. However, local Norwegians, intimately familiar with the intricate network of woods and trails, developed ingenious ways to bypass these patrols. These courageous “border pilots,” alongside those who bravely hid refugees in their homes, stood among the most daring members of the resistance movement, undertaking risks that often carried the ultimate penalty.

Approximately 50,000 Norwegians ultimately found refuge in Sweden during the war. Initially, Norwegian refugees were met with a rather stringent reception by Swedish immigration authorities, with several hundred unfortunately turned away as ineligible for entry. Norwegian military personnel, upon crossing the border, were interned as dictated by the Hague Conventions . However, as the war progressed and the humanitarian crisis deepened, Swedish policy shifted, and all Norwegians were subsequently recognized and treated as political refugees. Dedicated reception centers were established from 1941 onwards. From 1942 to 1945, the primary Norwegian refugee center was located at KjesÀter , near VingÄker , a place of temporary safety and hope for 42,800 Norwegians who passed through its gates during the war.

Significantly, Sweden provided sanctuary to approximately 900 Norwegian Jews, representing about half of Norway’s Jewish population, a crucial act of humanitarian aid in the face of genocide.

A great many of these refugees were men of military age, driven by a fervent desire to join the Norwegian armed forces operating abroad. Before the German invasion of Russia (Operation Barbarossa), a number of these determined individuals managed to make their way out of Sweden and travel through Russian territory to Britain , often embarking on incredibly circuitous routes via India, South Africa, or Canada. However, after the launch of Operation Barbarossa , the overland route across Russian soil was abruptly closed, forcing a re-evaluation of escape strategies.

In the final two years of the war, the Norwegian government in exile in London successfully secured permission and cooperation from the Swedish authorities to clandestinely establish military formations on Swedish territory. These units, misleadingly termed the “Police troops” (Polititroppene), were recruited from the pool of Norwegian refugees. While some members were indeed legitimate police officers, and Sweden did permit limited weapons training in a few designated camps, for the vast majority, the term “Police” served as a convenient cover-up for what was, in reality, pure military training. These formations, numbering 12,000 men by VE Day , were organized into battalions, complete with their own pioneer, signals, and artillery units. They were equipped with Swedish weapons and matĂ©riel and rigorously trained by both Norwegian and Swedish officers, forming a formidable, if covert, force for liberation.

A contingent of these “Police troops” played a pivotal role in the liberation of Finnmark during the harsh winter of 1944/45, after the area had been brutally evacuated by the Germans. The remainder of these highly trained forces participated in the liberation of the rest of Norway following the German surrender in May 1945, a triumphant return to their homeland.

Treason trials

German soldiers await transport at a camp in Mandal in August 1945, destined to be returned home to a defeated Germany . Another image depicts a German soldier clearing a mine near Stavanger in August 1945, a dangerous and grim task for the vanquished.

Even before the cannons fell silent, a heated debate raged among Norwegians concerning the appropriate fate of those deemed traitors and collaborators. A vocal minority, fueled by righteous anger and the trauma of occupation, advocated for a swift and brutal “night of long knives,” demanding extrajudicial killings of known offenders. However, cooler, more reasoned minds ultimately prevailed, and considerable effort was invested in ensuring that accused traitors received due process trials. In the end, Norwegian authorities carried out 37 executions: 25 Norwegians were put to death on charges of treason, and 12 Germans for egregious crimes against humanity. A staggering 28,750 individuals were arrested, though the majority were subsequently released due to insufficient evidence. Ultimately, 20,000 Norwegians and a smaller number of Germans received prison sentences. Seventy-seven Norwegians and 18 Germans were given life sentences, a grim testament to the gravity of their offenses. Additionally, a significant number of people were ordered to pay heavy fines, a financial penalty for their wartime actions.

These trials, while necessary, have not been immune to scrutiny and criticism in later years. It has been pointed out, with some validity, that sentences tended to become more lenient as time passed, suggesting an evolving societal perspective on wartime collaboration. Furthermore, a substantial number of charges were founded upon the arguably unconstitutional and illegal retroactive application of laws, raising troubling questions about the principles of legal fairness.

German prisoners of war

In a stark and rather brutal twist of fate after the war, the Norwegian government compelled German prisoners of war to undertake the perilous task of clearing vast minefields left behind by their own forces. By the time this grim work concluded in September 1946, a tragic toll had been exacted: 392 German soldiers had been injured, and 275 had been killed. In stark contrast, only two Norwegians and four British mine-clearers sustained any injuries during the same period. It has been reported, with disturbing implications, that many of the Germans perished due to their guards’ callous habit of forcing them to run criss-cross over a cleared field, an utterly barbaric method to ensure that no mines remained hidden. A grim, final chapter of vengeance.

Legacy of the occupation

By the time the war finally concluded, the German occupation had inflicted a devastating blow to Norway’s economy, reducing its GDP by a staggering 45% – a greater proportional decrease than any other occupied country. Beyond this economic decimation, the nation also suffered profound physical and patrimonial ravages as a direct result of the war itself. In Finnmark , these losses were particularly egregious, as vast swathes of the region were systematically destroyed under the brutal scorched earth policy implemented by the Germans during their retreat. Moreover, numerous towns and settlements across Norway bore the scars of conflict, extensively damaged or utterly obliterated by relentless bombing and fierce fighting.

Social and cultural transformation

The profound adversity forged during the occupation years, ironically, served to strengthen and more sharply define the Norwegian national identity. While the history of the resistance movement may have been, perhaps understandably, somewhat glorified in the post-war narrative, it undeniably provided future Norwegian military and political leaders with enduring, heroic role models. The shared hardship and collective suffering experienced during the war years also laid crucial groundwork for the expansive social welfare policies that would characterize the post-war Norwegian Labour Party governments. Furthermore, the occupation irrevocably shattered Norway’s traditional policy of neutrality , a dramatic shift formalized when Norway became a founding member of NATO in 1949. Finally, this traumatic period instilled a broad political and popular commitment to maintaining armed forces of sufficient strength to realistically defend the country against any conceivable future threat, coupled with an unwavering resolve to keep those armed forces under firm civilian control – a lesson learned at immense cost.

Surviving Luftwaffe aircraft

Jagdgeschwader 5 (5th Fighter Wing), the primary Luftwaffe day fighter unit stationed in Norway during the war, holds a rather unique distinction: it saw more of its Second World War German fighter aircraft survive the conflict than any other unit within the forces of the Axis powers . The complement of these surviving German fighter aircraft, once serving with JG 5, includes some twenty examples of the iconic Messerschmitt Bf 109 , alongside several examples of the radial-engined versions of the formidable Focke-Wulf Fw 190 . A small number of these JG 5 aircraft have, in recent times, been meticulously restored to flying condition by various organizations, gracing airshow events with their historical presence. Furthermore, a few others that once served with JG 5 are also currently undergoing restoration to flying condition in the early 21st century, a testament to their enduring legacy.

The sole surviving original example of the Arado Ar 234 Blitz, the revolutionary turbojet-powered reconnaissance bomber, now meticulously restored and proudly displayed in the Smithsonian Institution ’s Udvar-Hazy Center , has its own Norwegian connection. In 1945, this very aircraft was based in Norway with Kampfgeschwader 76 (76th Bomber Wing) before being brought to the United States through the efforts of Operation Lusty , transported across the Atlantic on the deck of HMS Reaper escort carrier .

See also