- 1. Overview
- 2. Etymology
- 3. Cultural Impact
Supranational union of Belarus and Russia
This article is about the post-Soviet organization. For the non-seceding side of the American civil war, see Union (American Civil War) . For subnational division, see Union territory (disambiguation) . For other, see Union (disambiguation) .
• Not to be confused with State of the Union or Union State Bank (disambiguation) .
Union State
• Союзное государство (Russian ) • Саюзная дзяржава (Belarusian )
The Union State, with occupied territories in light green [a] Headquarters 8/5 Staraya Square , Entrance 3, 103132 Moscow , Russia [3] Largest city Moscow 55°45′N 37°37′E / 55.750°N 37.617°E / 55.750; 37.617 Official languages • Belarusian • Russian Demonyms Russians , Belarusians Type Supranational union Member states • Belarus • Russia Government Supranational union (currently), confederation (proposed) • Chairman of the Supreme State Council Alexander Lukashenko • Chairman of the Council of Ministers Mikhail Mishustin • General (State) Secretary Sergey Glazyev Legislature Supreme State Council and Council of Ministers • Upper house Supreme State Council • Lower house Council of Ministers Formation • Dissolution of the Soviet Union 26 December 1991 • Commonwealth of Belarus and Russia 2 April 1997 • Treaty on the Creation of a Union State of Russia and Belarus 8 December 1999 Area • Total 17,305,846 km 2 (6,681,824 sq mi) a Population • 2025 estimate 159,729,208 a • Density 8.9/km 2 (23.1/sq mi) GDP (PPP ) 2025 estimate • Total $7.502 trillion [4] GDP • (nominal) 2024 estimate • Total $2.257 trillion [4] Currency • Belarusian ruble • Russian ruble Time zone UTC +2 to +12 Date format dd.mm.yyyy Website soyuz .by /en
• ^ Combined Belarus and Russian numbers, excluding annexed Crimea in March 2014 that is not recognized internationally.
The entity known as the Union State [b], a rather ambitious designation for what is, at its core, a supranational union , is comprised of Belarus and Russia . Its oft-stated primary objective is to forge a deeper, more integrated relationship between these two sovereign states, primarily through the harmonization of their economic and defence policies. One might even call it a perpetual work-in-progress, given its long and winding path. [5] [6]
Initially, the grand vision for the Union State was the creation of a genuine confederation – a structure implying a significant pooling of sovereignty. However, reality, as it so often does, intervened. Both Belarus and Russia have, to date, managed to maintain their individual independence, rendering the confederation aspect more of a theoretical aspiration than a tangible achievement. [7] It seems the allure of full sovereignty remains a powerful, if sometimes inconvenient, force.
The Union State finds its foundational bedrock in an earlier international treaty [8] meticulously crafted and agreed upon by Russia and Belarus on a rather significant date: 2 April 1997. While it currently consists solely of these two post-Soviet nations, the framework optimistically allows for the potential accession of other countries. [6] A sort of open invitation to anyone else who fancies a taste of this particular brand of integration, I suppose.
The governance structure of this supranational union is theoretically managed by the Supreme State Council [10], alongside a smattering of other, presumably less supreme, governing bodies [11]. As of the year 2025, the distinguished chairman of this Supreme State Council is Alexander Lukashenko , a figure who has held this esteemed position with unwavering tenacity since the year 2000. [12] The contemporary focus of the Union State appears to be squarely on more practical, if somewhat less romantic, matters: primarily economic integration [13], the thorny issue of taxation [14], and the rather sensitive merging of defence and intelligence apparatuses [15]. Because nothing says “unity” quite like shared surveillance and coordinated military exercises.
History of formation
The journey to this “Union State” began not with a bang, but with a rather cautious whimper, on 2 April 1996, with the establishment of the Community of Belarus and Russia. This initial step followed a series of 1995 agreements that, among other things, cemented a Russian military presence in Belarus . Clearly, some relationships start with a subtle military suggestion. [16] This nascent union was then given a slightly more robust, if still somewhat ambiguous, form on 2 April 1997, when the “Treaty on the Union between Belarus and Russia” was signed. At this point, its name was updated to the Union of Belarus and Russia, suggesting a subtle shift in perceived gravitas. [17]
The ambition for deeper integration was further underscored by the signing of several additional agreements on 25 December 1998. These documents were ostensibly intended to foster greater political, economic, and social integration between the two nations. [17] One can almost hear the collective sigh of bureaucrats drafting more paperwork.
Despite these efforts, the precise nature of this evolving political entity remained, shall we say, rather ill-defined. Under considerable pressure from his political adversaries, who, with understandable nostalgia, clamored for a full reunion of the two states, and from Belarusian president Alexander Lukashenko , who, with keen economic pragmatism, sought to buttress his rather fragile economy with Russia’s more robust one, Russian president Boris Yeltsin took the initiative. His goal was to orchestrate the creation of this Union, primarily to iron out the persistent political and economic disparities that plagued the relationship between the two countries. [18]
Some astute observers of the time posited that Lukashenko’s motivations were not entirely altruistic, suggesting he harbored ambitions of ascending to a position of greater power. Specifically, he was thought to eye the presidency of a future Russia-Belarus federation, particularly given Yeltsin’s then-dismal popularity. However, fate, or perhaps simply the democratic process, intervened. Following Yeltsin’s resignation, Vladimir Putin was subsequently elected in 2000 as his successor to the Russian presidency. Concurrently, a significant public display of dissent, the Freedom March , erupted in 1999 in the Belarusian capital of Minsk , specifically protesting against the very idea of unification. Putin’s ascension and the vocal opposition of the Freedom March effectively compelled Lukashenko to reassess his more expansive plans. He was forced to adopt a more delicate balancing act, attempting to preserve Belarusian independence while simultaneously navigating Putin’s increasing pressure for deeper integration within the Union State framework. [19] [20] A delicate dance, indeed.
The definitive “Treaty on the Creation of a Union State of Russia and Belarus” was finally signed on 8 December 1999. [21] This document boldly articulated the intention to achieve a fully integrated federation , reminiscent of the former Soviet Union , complete with a common head of state, a unified legislature, a shared flag, coat of arms, anthem, constitution, army, citizenship, and even a single currency. One might argue it was a rather ambitious shopping list. This treaty was subsequently ratified by the Russian State Duma on 22 December 1999, and by the National Assembly of Belarus on 26 January 2000. It was on this latter date that the Treaty, and by extension, the Union itself, officially came into effect, at least on paper. [22]
It’s worth noting that this concept of a broader Eurasian union wasn’t entirely novel. Then-Kazakh president Nursultan Nazarbayev had, back in 1994, put forth a somewhat similar proposal. However, his vision wasn’t fully realized until much later, on 29 May 2014, with the formal establishment of the Eurasian Economic Union . [23] Perhaps good ideas, like fine wine, simply take time to mature, or perhaps, like bad ideas, they just keep resurfacing.
Governing bodies and legal framework
The very foundation of the Union State, its purported constitutional act, is laid out by the Treaty on the Creation of a Union State . [6] This crucial document meticulously delineates the legal framework and establishes the various institutions that are meant to govern this supranational union . [24] [10] [17] These include:
• The Supreme State Council [9] [25] [26] – presumably where the most supreme decisions are made. • The Council of Ministers [27] [9] [25] – tasked with the rather less glamorous, but equally important, executive functions. • The Union Parliament [9] [25] – a legislative body, though its full realization has been a protracted affair. • The Court of the Union [9] [25] [6] – the judicial arm, though, interestingly, its formation has remained in a state of perpetual anticipation. • The Accounting Chamber [9] [25] – to ensure the Union’s finances are, theoretically, in order.
Based on its foundational treaties, the Union State is granted exclusive jurisdiction over a rather extensive list of competencies. This includes the creation of a truly singular economic space, the establishment of legal underpinnings for a common market, the ambitious goal of a monetary union, a unified tax and pricing policy, and the integrated development and procurement of defence equipment. Furthermore, it oversees a unified system for the technical support of the armed forces. The notion of a common command for regional military forces is not merely theoretical; it is realized through a multitude of other documents that derive their authority from this very Union State jurisdiction [28]. This also extends to a common border policy and various other areas of shared governance [6]. One might observe that the blueprint is certainly comprehensive, if not always perfectly executed.
Beyond these exclusive jurisdictions, there are also areas of joint jurisdiction, where the Union State and its constituent subjects (that is, Belarus and Russia ) share authority. These include a joint defence policy, the harmonization and unification of the member states’ legislation – a bureaucratic undertaking of epic proportions, I assure you – and the collaborative development of science, education, and culture. It also extends to the formation of a common scientific, technological, and information space, as well as critical areas like migration, working conditions, labor protection, social security, and the ever-present battles against terrorism and corruption, among others. [6] A truly encompassing vision, if you can wrap your head around it.
Crucially, and perhaps somewhat ironically given the “union” aspect, outside the precise boundaries of the Union State’s exclusive jurisdiction and the subjects of joint jurisdiction, the individual member states of the Union retain the full completeness of their state power. [6] A testament, perhaps, to the enduring, if sometimes inconvenient, nature of national sovereignty.
Pavel Borodin holds the distinction of being the inaugural State Secretary of the Union. He was first appointed by the Supreme State Council on 26 January 2000, serving an initial four-year term. His tenure was subsequently renewed in both 2004 and 2008 for additional four-year periods, ultimately concluding his service in 2011. Since his departure, the office has seen a succession of individuals, including Grigory Rapota , Dmitry Mezentsev , and the current incumbent, Sergey Glazyev . citation needed A revolving door, perhaps, for a role that manages the daily grind of this complex entity.
The Union State is, in theory, presided over by its Supreme State Council [25]. This august body comprises the heads of the member states, their respective governments, and representatives from both chambers of their national parliaments [12]. Decisions within the Supreme Council are reached based on the principle of “one state – one vote,” with the presidents of the member states casting that singular vote. The Supreme Council also includes the chairman of the Executive Committee of the Union, who, rather quaintly, holds an advisory vote. The presidency of the Supreme State Council rotates among the heads of the participating states, unless, of course, the participating states decide to agree otherwise – a clause that leaves ample room for strategic maneuvering.
The Supreme State Council is entrusted with making pivotal decisions concerning the security of the Union’s member states. This broad mandate includes their collective protection from external threats, the safeguarding of the Union’s borders, military development, and a plethora of other critical issues that one might expect such a body to oversee.
The Council of Ministers [27], a rather more hands-on body, is composed of the member states’ Prime Ministers, Ministers of Foreign Affairs, Economy, and Finance, along with the State Secretary of the Union. To facilitate its ongoing work, a Permanent Committee of the Union State [29] is formed as a permanent working body of the Council of Ministers [30]. The current president of this Council of Ministers is Mikhail Mishustin .
20th Anniversary of Russia Belarus Union Treaty
The Parliamentary Assembly of the Union is, in its envisioned form, meant to be bicameral, comprising two distinct chambers: the House of the Union and the House of Representatives. The latter, the House of Representatives, is stipulated to include 75 deputies from Russia and 28 from Belarus , all to be elected by the general populace of each country. However, in a classic display of “plans versus reality,” the treaty specifies that, currently, only the House of the Union has actually been formed. This existing chamber consists of 72 deputies, evenly split with 36 from Russia and 36 from Belarus . Prior to the elections for the full House of Representatives of the Union State Parliament, the functions typically ascribed to the Union State Parliament are performed by this Parliamentary Assembly of the Union of Belarus and Russia, in accordance with paragraph 4 of Article 70 of the Treaty on the Establishment of the Union State of 8 December 1999. Regular sessions of the House of the Union Parliament are held twice annually, and for a Quorum to be met, at least two-thirds of its members must be present. The House of the Union Parliament is structured with 1 president, 4 vice-presidents, and 8 permanent committees, each dedicated to different areas of legislature. [31] The current president of this Parliamentary Assembly of the Union is Vyacheslav Volodin . [31] [32] On 12 December 2020, the 59th joint session of the House of the Union parliament convened to deliberate and approve the Union State budget for 2021. This budget amounted to 4715.15 million roubles , which, for those who prefer more universally understood figures, translates to approximately 61,631,112 US dollars. [33] [34] vague
The Court of Union, a vital component of any functioning legal framework, is intended to consist of nine judges, each appointed for a six-year term. However, despite the clear provisions for its establishment within the adopted treaty, this particular court has, rather conspicuously, not yet been formed. [35] One might wonder about the efficacy of a legal framework without its judicial arbiter.
The Accounting Chamber, on the other hand, is a functioning body, specifically tasked with the rather critical responsibility of overseeing and controlling the implementation of the Union State budget. It is comprised of 11 members [36], who are appointed for a period of 6 years. These members are selected from citizens of the member states who possess relevant experience in control and audit, and their appointments are made by the Parliament of the Union State upon the proposal of the Council of Ministers. The Accounting Chamber is afforded the autonomy to establish its own regulations, which are then subject to approval by the Council of Ministers. A necessary safeguard, one assumes, against the inevitable complexities of shared finances.
Language
In a gesture towards linguistic parity, the official languages of the Union State are, quite sensibly, designated as the state languages of the participating states. However, for the practical day-to-day operations and official communications within the common organs of the Union State, Russian is employed as the working language. [6] A pragmatic choice, perhaps, or merely an acknowledgment of existing linguistic realities.
Developments
Shortly after its formal inauguration, both member states appeared to experience a noticeable cooling of their initial enthusiasm for the Union. In a rather telling move, Russia , followed swiftly by Belarus , reinstated customs controls along their shared border in 2001. This action effectively, and rather unceremoniously, suspended the nascent customs union until its eventual, and somewhat belated, restoration in 2010. One might interpret this as a clear indication that grand plans often encounter stubborn practicalities.
Furthermore, ambitious plans had been set in motion to introduce a common currency across the Union. A bold step towards true economic integration, one would think. Yet, these plans have been repeatedly postponed, not once, not twice, but several times over the years. It seems some aspirations are more easily articulated than implemented.
On 16 November 2010, the Union State’s official website rather optimistically declared that the Constitutional Act, a pivotal document for its future, was “99% ready.” [37] A statistic that, much like a perpetually unfinished painting, leaves one wondering about that final, elusive percentage.
Common currency
Belarusian president Alexander Lukashenko , with a characteristic flair for bold pronouncements, had previously pledged to introduce a common currency by 1 January 2004. Predictably, this currency was not introduced, and the deadline was, with rather tiresome regularity, pushed back by a year. This pattern repeated itself: on 1 January 2005, the Union State once again failed to launch its common currency, leading to another year-long postponement, a scenario that played out yet again in 2006.
During a press conference held in Minsk on 2 February 2006, Pyotr Prokopovich , the then-chief of the National Bank of Belarus , offered a glimmer of hope, announcing that a “common currency might be introduced in 2007.” This, however, proved to be another false dawn, as 2007 came and went without a unified currency. In a rather significant policy shift, the National Bank of the Republic of Belarus subsequently declared that, commencing in 2008, the Belarusian ruble would be pegged to the United States dollar , rather than its traditional anchor, the Russian ruble . [38] needs update A clear signal, perhaps, of differing economic priorities, or simply a recognition that some aspects of integration are harder to achieve than others.
Citizenship and freedom of migration
One of the more tangible benefits offered by the Union State is its provision for citizenship, meaning that every citizen of the Russian Federation and every citizen of the Republic of Belarus simultaneously holds citizenship in the Union. This dual status comes with a rather significant guarantee: the right to move and reside freely within the territory of the other party. This means Belarusian citizens can travel without hindrance in Russia and possess the right to settle there for work or study, and vice versa. This also extends to the possession, use, and disposal of property in the other state. [39]
Essentially, the Union State bestows upon citizens of Russia and Belarus the rather convenient right to work and establish permanent residence in either country without having to navigate the often labyrinthine formal immigration procedures typically mandated for foreign nationals. They retain their national passports and other identification papers, making the process remarkably streamlined. It’s a pragmatic arrangement, certainly, if not quite the full “common citizenship” initially envisioned.
Military
On 10 February 2009, Russia and Belarus embarked on the initial phase of joint military officer training programs. These initiatives were specifically designed to foster deeper integration between the military structures of the two countries, a goal often cited in the Union’s objectives. This collective military entity is formally known as the Regional Forces Group of Belarus and Russia (RGF). The overarching aim of these operations is to ensure cohesive training, practice, and the effective implementation of military interests for both nations. The strategic and battle training exercises that took place in February and March 2009 were a clear manifestation of this intent. [40]
Furthermore, the military doctrine of the Russian Federation contains a rather unambiguous provision: “an armed attack on the state-participant in the Union State, as well as all other actions involving the use of military force against it,” is to be unequivocally considered “an act of aggression against the Union State.” This clause, naturally, authorizes Moscow to “take measures in response.” [41] A rather clear declaration of collective defense, implying that an attack on one is an attack on both.
In a more recent development, on 6 December 2024, Russia and Belarus formalized their mutual security commitments by signing a comprehensive treaty on security guarantees. This treaty was subsequently ratified by Russia on 28 February 2025, and by Belarus on 4 March 2025. [42] [43] The accord officially entered into force on 13 March 2025, solidifying a deeper military alliance. [44]
Proposed symbols
Proposed flag of the Union State
Despite the formation of the Union State in 1997, Belarus and Russia have, rather remarkably, yet to agree upon and institute any official symbols, including a flag, for this purported union. One might imagine the committees dedicated to such matters are particularly indecisive, or perhaps simply overwhelmed. Nevertheless, there have been several proposals put forth for both flags and coats of arms over the years. [45] [46]
Two primary proposals have emerged for the flag of the Union. In both instances, these designs are essentially modifications of the iconic flag of the Soviet Union , with the crucial distinction that they are intended to represent the state itself, rather than the communist ideology it once embodied. Both proposals feature two gold stars prominently placed in the canton of the red flag, each star symbolizing one of the two constituent states of the Union. [46] A subtle nod to the past, perhaps, but with a clear attempt to rebrand.
A proposed coat of arms also draws inspiration from historical heraldry, specifically a modification of the traditional double-headed eagle . In this proposed design, the eagle is depicted holding the individual coats of arms of both Russia and Belarus , symbolizing their combined entity. [45]
Furthermore, a song titled “Sovereign Union of Nations ” (in Russian : Державный союз народов, Derzhavny soyuz narodov; in Belarusian : Дзяржаўны саюз народаў, Dzyarzhauny sayuz narodau) has been put forward as the Union’s unofficial anthem. This composition is a modified version of the National Anthem of the Soviet Union , with its lyrics carefully adapted to refer to a wider union of the two nations. [47] It seems that some historical melodies are simply too catchy to discard entirely.
Value-added tax controversy
A particularly vexing issue that plagued the early years of the Union State was the rather convoluted matter of value-added tax (VAT). This tax was, rather optimistically, intended to help finance the Union State itself. Prior to 1 January 2005, both Belarus and Russia collected VAT in the country where the goods originated. However, from that date forward, the policy shifted to collecting VAT in the country of destination, a standard practice in most other independent nations globally.
This seemingly minor administrative change unleashed a considerable degree of confusion and, rather inconveniently, significantly disrupted numerous trade operations between Belarus and Russia . The complexities and financial implications of the new system were not lost on the affected parties. On 10 February 2005, private entrepreneurs in Belarus staged a one-day warning strike, a clear and public protest not only against this new VAT scheme between the two countries but also against Lukashenko’s broader economic policies. It seems even the most well-intentioned attempts at integration can stumble over the intricacies of taxation.
Contemplated expansion
Member states States that had previously expressed interest in joining
The Union State, in its aspirational vision, has always left the door open for other countries to join its ranks. And indeed, several nations, or at least factions within them, have expressed varying degrees of interest in becoming part of this unique supranational union .
• Abkhazia and South Ossetia , two entities whose international recognition remains, shall we say, rather limited, currently hold observer status in parliamentary sessions. citation needed Both have, at different points, voiced a desire to join the Russia-Belarus Union State, though Belarus itself does not officially recognize either of them. [48] A somewhat awkward situation, one might observe.
• Armenia : Various political parties within Armenia , including the Constitutional Rights Union [49], National Unity [50], and the Towards Russia Party [51], have openly advocated for the country’s accession to the Union. In April 2025, the newly elected Mayor of Gyumri , Armenia’s second-largest city, Vardan Ghukasyan , a member of the Communist Party , publicly supported the idea of joining the Union State. [52] It seems some political currents flow strongly towards Moscow .
• Kazakhstan had, at one point, expressed interest in forming a separate customs union with Russia and Belarus by 2010. [53] This Customs Union was indeed formed precisely as planned at the beginning of 2010. There had even been whispers that Kazakhstan might, in due course, consider joining the Union State itself. However, in late May 2023, President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev rather decisively declined an offer from President Alexander Lukashenko to join the union, famously referring to the suggestion as a “joke.” [53] [54] A clear indicator, perhaps, of where Kazakhstan’s priorities truly lie.
• Kyrgyzstan : As of June 2007, amidst significant political turmoil within Kyrgyzstan , opposition factions had initiated a nationwide referendum aimed at joining the union of Russia and Belarus . [55] When domestic politics falter, looking for external anchors is a common, if not always successful, strategy.
• Moldova : In 2001, shortly after his election, President Vladimir Voronin of Moldova made a rather surprising announcement: he harbored plans for Moldova to join the Union of Russia and Belarus . [56] [57] However, the political landscape in Moldova shifted dramatically with the coming to power of the Alliance for European Integration in the 2009 Moldovan elections. This change effectively redirected Moldovan interest firmly towards the European Union , placing any notions of joining the Union State firmly on the back burner.
• Transnistria : In the Transnistrian referendum of 2006 , the government of this unrecognized state claimed that an overwhelming 97.2% of the population voted in favor of integrating Transnistria into Russia . Analysts have interpreted this as a strong indication that Transnistria might, at some future point, unilaterally seek to join the Union State, once it is more firmly established. Indeed, as early as spring 1998, a non-binding referendum conducted by the Transnistrian state saw 66.5% of voters support joining the Union of Russia and Belarus . [58] However, given that Transnistria is not recognized by either of the Union State’s current members, such a move remains highly improbable in the foreseeable future. Recognition, it seems, is a rather stubborn prerequisite.
• Ukraine : In response to rampant speculation about Ukraine potentially joining the Union, then-President of Ukraine , Viktor Yanukovych , unequivocally declared that Ukraine was, and would remain, an independent sovereign state, a status he asserted could not be questioned by anyone within the government. [59] This issue, however, was fundamentally re-evaluated and transformed in the wake of the Revolution of Dignity and the subsequent developments of the Euromaidan movement, which decisively oriented Ukraine towards integration with the European Union . During the term of office of the fifth President of Ukraine , Petro Poroshenko , the Constitution of Ukraine was amended in 2019 to legally consolidate the irreversibility of Ukraine’s course towards joining the European Union and NATO, a direct consequence of the events of the Revolution of Dignity in 2014. In 2021, the sixth president of Ukraine , Volodymyr Zelenskyy , articulated a stark warning, stating that the formation of a “true union state” between Belarus and Russia posed a genuine danger to Ukraine . [60] This concern proved tragically prescient, as Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, a significant escalation of the ongoing Russo-Ukrainian War .
• Novorossiya : During the 2014 Russian military intervention in Ukraine , Deputy Prime Minister Rustam Temirgaliev of the Russian-annexed Republic of Crimea expressed a rather optimistic hope that southeastern Ukraine would coalesce into a “Ukrainian Federation” and subsequently join the Union State. [61] However, only the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic and Luhansk People’s Republic ultimately broke away from Ukraine , and the broader confederate Novorossiya political project was effectively frozen at the start of 2015. [62] [63] [64] Another grand vision, perhaps, that failed to materialize.
• FR Yugoslavia /Serbia : On April 12, 1999, at a time of significant geopolitical upheaval, the Federal Assembly of the FR Yugoslavia passed a decision regarding its accession to the Union state of Russia and Belarus . [65] The legal successor to this decision is now the Republic of Serbia . In 2007, Speaker of Parliament Tomislav Nikolić publicly stated, during a speech, his desire for Serbia to strengthen its ties with, and eventually join, the Union State, rather than pursuing membership in the European Union . [66] However, Nikolić resigned from his position less than a week later. Although he did eventually serve as President of Serbia from 2012–2017, Serbia had already submitted a membership application to the EU in 2009 and had achieved full candidate status by March 2012, prior to his presidential term. The path, it seems, had already been chosen.
Renewed interest
A clickable Euler diagram showing the relationships among various supranational organisations in the territory of the former Soviet Union
• v • t • e
On 15 December 2006, discussions surrounding the Union State were reported to be intensifying citation needed . However, by January 2007, the talks appeared to have, shall we say, hit a snag. President Alexander Lukashenko of Belarus made a rather pointed statement: “The Russian leadership is demanding that we join the Russian Federation—that’s what is in the heads of the Russian leadership. I don’t want to bury the sovereignty and independence of [Belarus].” He further elaborated, “From all the consultations and discussions, I have understood that we have different approaches and understandings of the building of a Union State,” and explicitly opposed “the possibility of the incorporation into Russia [of Belarus ].” [67] A clear and unequivocal rejection of annexation, rather than integration.
Nevertheless, on 19 October 2007, Russian prime minister Viktor Zubkov announced that the budget of the Union State “will grow by no less than ten percent next year, and that growth will provide for worthy funding of our common projects.” [68] This declaration sparked speculation that the Russian government had, once again, rekindled its interest in the concept of the Union State. Money, after all, often speaks volumes.
A high-profile meeting between President Lukashenko of Belarus , President Vladimir Putin of Russia , and Union State Secretary Pavel Borodin took place in Minsk on 13–14 December 2007. This gathering garnered considerable media attention and fueled renewed speculation that the Union State might indeed be the focal point of a fresh initiative from both governments. Of particular interest was the renewed discussion surrounding the Union Parliament (a body which, despite being planned, had never actually materialized) and a Union State Constitutional Act, a legal instrument that could, theoretically, significantly bolster the authority of the Union. According to State Secretary Borodin , five distinct variants of this Act were deliberated during the meeting, each of which envisioned a transitional period of 7 to 10 years for the Union’s development. Trade and energy issues, naturally, were also on the agenda. [69]
On 27 May 2008, President Lukashenko , exercising his authority as Chairman of the Supreme State Council, appointed the then-Russian prime minister and current president, Putin , as chairman of the Council of Ministers. [70] This move, naturally, ignited further speculation that the Union was on the cusp of a significant political transformation. However, it’s worth noting that the most visible, and arguably most influential, official within the Union has consistently been the State Secretary, who is responsible for managing the Union State’s day-to-day operations. In the same meeting, State Secretary Borodin announced that the 2009 Union State budget would amount to a sum of 6–7 billion roubles , representing a rather substantial increase of over 2 billion roubles from the previous year, 2008.
On 1 August 2011, Putin publicly stated his support for a union encompassing Russia , Belarus , and potentially even South Ossetia . [71] However, this idea was swiftly rejected by Belarusian foreign minister spokesman Andrei Savinykh [72], as well as by Dmitri Medojev, South Ossetia’s ambassador to Moscow , who rather bluntly declared, “Our people voted for independence in a referendum in 2006 and they do not relish the idea of becoming part of the Russian Federation.” [72] It seems not everyone shared Putin’s expansive vision.
Since 2015, the primary focus for developing relations among former members of the Soviet Union has shifted towards the ongoing development of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). This entity itself represents a further evolution of the Eurasian Customs Union , which was originally established in 2010. The EAEU is explicitly modeled on the integration processes of the European Union and currently comprises 5 member states: Belarus , Russia , Kazakhstan , Armenia , and Kyrgyzstan . Tajikistan has also, rather tentatively, expressed an interest in joining citation needed . However, it is crucial to remember that the EAEU is, at its core, solely an economic union . Any aspirations for deeper political integration, for the time being, remain firmly within the purview of the Union State.
In 2021, renewed discussions among member states proposed deeper economic integration [73]. Subsequently, in November 2021, Russia and Belarus formalized an agreement designed to establish common policies across a range of critical sectors, including taxation, banking, industry, agriculture, and energy. [74] A rather comprehensive attempt to weave their economies more tightly together.
2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine
Following the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine , a conflict that notably saw part of its staging from Belarus’ territory, both Russia and Belarus found themselves subjected to a torrent of international sanctions and widespread boycotts . On 3 March, Belarusian president Alexander Lukashenko publicly affirmed his full support for Russian president Vladimir Putin’s campaign in Ukraine , framing it as an integral part of Belarus’s long-standing commitment to the Union State with Russia . [75] A rather stark demonstration of solidarity, or perhaps, obligation.
On 14 March, Russian prime minister Mikhail Mishustin met with Belarusian prime minister Roman Golovchenko in Moscow . Addressing reporters, Mishustin stated that they had “coordinated measures to protect our economic security and the technological sovereignty of Russia and Belarus ” and further emphasized, “consider it necessary to strengthen integration in the Union State.” [76] The sanctions, it seemed, only served to accelerate the perceived need for closer ties. On 18 March, the Russian government announced the lifting of all restrictions on the movement of citizens between Russia and Belarus . [77] And on 1 July 2022, Russian President Vladimir Putin himself declared that the “unification” process had been accelerated, with the explicit aim of mitigating the economic damage inflicted by the sanctions. [78]
In October 2022, in the aftermath of the September 2022 mobilization of reservists in Russia , a contingent of approximately 9,000 Russian soldiers arrived in Belarus . According to the Belarusian ministry of defence , the stated purpose of this deployment was the creation of a “regional military grouping” of the Union State. [79] In the same month, it was announced that Russian air forces were actively patrolling the borders of the Union State in Belarus . [80] The military aspect of the Union, it seems, was becoming increasingly prominent and active.
2023 nuclear deterrence
In a rather provocative interview aired by Russia’s state television in late May 2023, Lukashenko made a striking declaration. He stated, quite matter-of-factly, that other countries willing to join the Union State would be offered nuclear weapons: “If someone is worried… (then) it is very simple: join in the Union State of Belarus and Russia . That’s all: there will be nuclear weapons for everyone.” [81] This statement came just days after he had confirmed the commencement of the movement of some of Russia’s tactical nuclear weapons to Belarus . Furthermore, the Russian defence minister had previously confirmed the signing of documents outlining the procedure for storing tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus [82], a plan that Putin had initially unveiled in March. [83] A clear, if somewhat unsettling, new dimension to the Union’s potential offerings.
25th anniversary of the Treaty on the Creation of the Union State
On 6 December 2024, a date coinciding with the 25th anniversary of the Treaty on the Creation of the Union State, which was originally signed on December 9, 1999, a significant meeting of the Supreme State Council of the Union State took place. At this gathering, Russian president Vladimir Putin and his Belarusian counterpart, Alexander Lukashenko , formalized an expansion of their defense and security cooperation. They did so by signing the Russia-Belarus Treaty on security guarantees within the Union State. [84] [85] [86] [87] This treaty, a quarter-century after the initial foundational agreement, marked a further, and rather pointed, deepening of their strategic alignment.
See also
• Commonwealth of Independent States • Continental union • 2007 Russia–Belarus energy dispute • Post-Soviet states • Soviet Union • New Union Treaty • Belarus–Russia relations • Eurasian Economic Union • Common Travel Area , an arrangement allowing for relatively open borders between the United Kingdom and Ireland • Unionism in Ireland • 1950 Indo-Nepal Treaty of Peace and Friendship • European Single Market , a similar zone citation needed within the EU • Trans-Tasman Travel Arrangement , a similar agreement citation needed between Australia and New Zealand
Notes
• ^ Crimea , which was annexed by Russia in 2014, remains internationally recognised as a part of Ukraine . [1] Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia oblasts, which were annexed —though are only partially occupied—in 2022, also remain internationally recognised as a part of Ukraine . The southernmost Kuril Islands have been the subject of a territorial dispute with Japan since their occupation by the Soviet Union at the end of World War II. [2]
• ^ Russian : Союзное государство, romanized: Soyuznoye gosudarstvo; Belarusian : Саюзная дзяржава, romanized: Sajuznaja dziaržava.
References
• ^ Pifer, Steven (17 March 2020). “Crimea: Six years after illegal annexation”. Brookings Institution . Retrieved 30 November 2021.
• ^ Chapple, Amos (4 January 2019). “The Kurile Islands: Why Russia And Japan Never Made Peace After World War II”. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty . Retrieved 26 January 2022.
• ^ “Постоянный Комитет Союзного государства”. postkomsg.com.
• ^ a b “Report for Selected Countries and Subjects: April 2025”. International Monetary Fund . Retrieved 17 May 2025.
• ^ “СОЮЗНОЕ ГОСУДАРСТВО”. Совет Федерации Федерального Собрания Российской Федерации. Archived from the original on 22 April 2021. Retrieved 22 April 2021.
• ^ a b c d e f g h “Проект Конституционного акта Союзного государства”.
• ^ “A Political Union Between Russia and Belarus is Creeping Closer”. 23 September 2020.
• ^ “Куракина, Светлана Ивановна – Союзное государство Беларуси и России: конституционно-правовое исследование : автореферат дис. … кандидата юридических наук : 12.00.02 – Search RSL”.
• ^ a b c d e f “Устав Союза Беларуси и России от 23 мая 1997 – docs.cntd.ru”. docs.cntd.ru. Retrieved 14 October 2021.
• ^ a b “Союзное Государство”. Archived from the original on 29 May 2020.
• ^ “Органы Союзного государства”. belrus.ru.
• ^ a b “Высший Государственный Совет Союзного государства”.
• ^ “Full integration of Russia and Belarus unlikely in present context, says expert”. TASS. 16 February 2021. Retrieved 5 August 2021.
• ^ “Lukashenko says Minsk and Moscow agreed 26–27 roadmaps on integration”. TASS. 22 April 2021. Retrieved 5 August 2021.
• ^ “Putin believes integration processes of intelligence in Union State to be effective”. TASS. 22 April 2021. Retrieved 5 August 2021.
• ^ Žulys, Audrius (2005). “Towards a Union State of Russia and Belarus”. Lithuanian Foreign Policy Review (15–16): 149. Archived from the original on 23 September 2015 – via Central and Eastern Europe Online Library.
• ^ a b c Žulys, Audrius (2005). “Towards a Union State of Russia and Belarus”. Lithuanian Foreign Policy Review (15–16): 150. Archived from the original on 23 September 2015 – via Central and Eastern Europe Online Library.
• ^ “Boris Yeltsin’s Legacy”. personal.utulsa.edu. Archived from the original on 27 May 2019. Retrieved 28 May 2008.
• ^ Mankoff, Jeffrey (5 February 2020). “Will Belarus Be the Next Ukraine?”. Foreign Affairs . Archived from the original on 6 February 2020. Retrieved 2 June 2020. Lukashenko signed on in the apparent hope that he could one day replace Yeltsin and rule over both Belarus and Russia.
• ^ “How Belarus Maneuvers between Russia and the West”. Institute of Modern Russia. 30 April 2020. Retrieved 2 June 2020. […] Lukashenko was pleased with the idea for other reasons: he planned to use the arrangement to ultimately replace the unpopular Yeltsin. The creation of the Union State could lead to common citizenship, which would allow Lukashenko to run for the top office in case of Yeltsin’s departure. Another reason for him to move closer to Russia was that Belarus’ highly industrialized economy relied heavily on Russian raw materials, mostly gas and oil.
• ^ “Russia and Belarus form confederation”. news.bbc.co.uk. 8 December 1999.
• ^ Žulys, Audrius (2005). “Towards a Union State of Russia and Belarus”. Lithuanian Foreign Policy Review (15–16): 151. Archived from the original on 23 September 2015 – via Central and Eastern Europe Online Library.
• ^ Asadova, Nargiz. “An interview with Prime Minister of Kazakhstan Karim Masimov”. Originally printed in Kommersant, 4 June 2007, p. 2. Translated by Ferghana.Ru “An interview with Prime Minister of Kazakhstan Karim Masimov – Ferghana.Ru Information agency, Moscow”. Archived from the original on 5 June 2008. Retrieved 28 May 2008.
• ^ “Союзное государство: 20 лет совместного развития”. page726227.html. permanent dead link
• ^ a b c d e f “Статус Высшего Государственного Совета Союзного госдарства”. belrus.ru.
• ^ “Официальный сайт Постоянного Комитета Союзного государства | Высший Государственный Совет”.
• ^ a b “Официальный сайт Постоянного Комитета Союзного государства | Совет Министров”. www.postkomsg.com .
• ^ “Соглашение между Российской Федерацией и Республикой Беларусь о создании и функционировании объединенной системы связи региональной группировки войск (сил) Республики Беларусь и Российской Федерации от 19 января 2008 – docs.cntd.ru”. docs.cntd.ru. Retrieved 14 October 2021.
• ^ “Официальный сайт Постоянного Комитета Союзного государства | Постоянный Комитет Союзного государства”.
• ^ “Постоянный Комитет Союзного государства Россия Беларусь”. www.postkomsg.com .
• ^ a b “Парламентское Собрание Союза Беларуси и России”.
• ^ “21 ноября Вячеслав Володин проведет сессию Парламентского Собрания Союза Беларуси и России”. Государственная Дума. 21 November 2019.
• ^ “Выступление Вячеслава Володина на открытии 59-й сессии Парламентского Собрания Союза Беларуси и России”. Государственная Дума. 21 December 2020.
• ^ “Парламентарии утвердили бюджет Союзного государства Беларуси и России на 2021 год”. Государственная Дума. 21 December 2020.
• ^ “Суд”. belrus.ru.
• ^ “Счетная палата”.
• ^ “S. Shorshorov: Draft Constitutional Act is 99% Ready”. Archived from the original on 6 July 2011. Retrieved 22 November 2010.
• ^ “Belarus to link currency to dollar”. Associated Press . 15 August 2007. Archived from the original on 22 April 2008. Retrieved 1 October 2007.
• ^ “The agreement between the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation on providing the equal rights of citizens of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation on freedom of travel, the choice of the place of stay and residence in the territories of the State Parties of the Union State”. cis-legislation.com. 24 January 2006. Archived from the original on 11 May 2022.
• ^ “Link to joint military training”. Union State Website. 11 February 2009. Archived from the original on 14 August 2009. Retrieved 21 February 2009.
• ^ “Union State of Russia and Belarus: a military union?”. Window on Heartland. 14 January 2012. Archived from the original on 8 January 2016.
• ^ “Russia ratifies treaty with Belarus on security guarantees”. TASS. 28 February 2025. Retrieved 8 March 2025.
• ^ “Aleksandr Lukashenko signs Belarus-Russia security treaty into law”. president.gov.by. Retrieved 8 March 2025.
• ^ “Joint news conference with President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko”. President of Russia. 13 March 2025. Retrieved 16 March 2025.
• ^ a b Проект герба Союза России и Белоруссии (2002 г.). Geraldika.ru (in Russian). Archived from the original on 6 April 2023. Retrieved 27 October 2008.
• ^ a b “флаги союза РФ и РБ”. vexillographia.ru.
• ^ Державный Союз Народов (in Russian). 2003. Retrieved 22 February 2008.
• ^ “Bzhania Readies to Host the Russian Navy, Wants to Join the Union State”. Civil Georgia. 5 October 2023. Retrieved 29 December 2023.
• ^ “Ambassador of Belarus to Armenia Alexander Konyuk visited the CRU office”. iravunk.com.
• ^ “Արտաշես Գեղամյան. Հայաստանն անվտանգության մեջ կլինի միայն Ռուսաստանի և Բելառուսի միութենական պետությունում” [Artashes Geghamyan: Armenia will be secure only in the Union State of Russia and Belarus]. iravunk.com. 12 May 2021. Archived from the original on 14 May 2021.
• ^ “Մենք սորոսականներին Հայաստանից վռնդելու ենք. Հայկ Բաբուխանյան (Տեսանյութ)” [We will expel the Syrians from Armenia: Hayk Babukhanyan (Video)]. newsmedia.am. 31 December 2020.
• ^ “Gyumri’s newly elected mayor says he supports a union state with Russia”. OC Media . 17 April 2025.
• ^ a b “Customs Union of Belarus, Russia, Kazakhstan to be up and running by 2010”. Archived from the original on 15 March 2012. Retrieved 31 July 2007.
• ^ Balachuk, Iryna (29 May 2023). “Kazakhstan’s President declines Lukashenko’s offer to join the Union State of Russia and Belarus”. Ukrainska Pravda.
• ^ “Trend – Новости Азербайджана. Турция, Иран, Центральна Азия”. news.trendaz.com.
• ^ “Moldova ready for Russia Belarus union”. BBC News Online . 17 April 2001.
• ^ “Communists of Moldova and the future of the country’s ethno-political conflicts” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 August 2007. Retrieved 31 July 2007.
• ^ “Transnistria or Moldavian Transnistrian Republic: Just facts”. Trades Ministry of the Republic of Moldova. Archived from the original on 20 December 2008. That same year, the Tiraspol Supreme Soviet chairman declared that the Transnistrian republic will demand that Moldova accepts full integration into the CIS and that it joins the Russian Federation–Belarus union, viewed as a possible future model for the MTR’s status vis-a-vis the Republic of Moldova. A non-binding referendum on joining the Russia–Belarus union was held between April and June 1998, with over 66 percent of the ballots supporting the union. However, like the province of Kaliningrad on the Baltic Sea (isolated from Russia by independent Lithuania and Poland), the east-bank separatist region, has no common borders with either Belarus or the Russian Federation.
• ^ “President makes statement regarding debates over idea of so-called union of Ukraine, Russia and Belarus”. Archived from the original on 20 March 2012. Retrieved 1 April 2010; Опыты независимой аналитики КУДА ИДЕМ МЫ С ЯНУКОВИЧЕМ?. Центр проблемного анализа и государственно-управленческого проектирования. 9 April 2010. Archived from the original on 15 March 2012.
• ^ “Зеленський заявив, що “справжня союзна держава” Росії та Білорусі є загрозою для України”. Рубрика. 31 May 2021. Archived from the original on 24 February 2022. Retrieved 3 June 2021.
• ^ Теміргалієв оголосив про швидке створення “Української Федерації” [Temirgaliyev announced the imminent creation of the “Ukrainian Federation”]. Ukrayinska Pravda. 12 April 2014.
• ^ “Russian-backed ‘Novorossiya’ breakaway movement collapses”. Ukraine Today . 20 May 2015.
• ^ Vladimir Dergachev; Dmitriy Kirillov (20 May 2015). Проект «Новороссия» закрыт [Project “New Russia” is closed]. Gazeta.ru (in Russian).
• ^ “Why the Kremlin Is Shutting Down the Novorossiya Project”. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Archived from the original on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 20 December 2015.
• ^ “Одлука о приступању Савезне Републике Југославије Савезу Русије и Белорусије: 25/1999-1” [Decision on the accession of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia to the Alliance of Russia and Belarus: 25/1999-1]. Službeni list SRJ. No. 25. Belgrade: Pravno informacioni sistem RS. 12 April 1999. Retrieved 22 January 2023.
• ^ “Serbian Parliament Speaker Calls For Closer Russia Ties”. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. 2 February 2012.
• ^ “Belarus local elections end” Archived 17 January 2007 at the Wayback Machine , al Jazeera , 14 January 2007.
• ^ “Itar-Tass”. Archived from the original on 14 January 2009.
• ^ President meets with State Secretary of the Belarus–Russia Union State Archived 12 June 2008 at the Wayback Machine
• ^ Belarusian Telegraphy Agency, “Union State budget 2009 to total RUR6–7 billion, Pavel Borodin says”
• ^ “Russian PM Says Unification With Belarus Possible and Desirable”. Voice of America. 1 August 2011. Retrieved 28 August 2011.
• ^ a b “Belarus rejects Putin’s call for unification with Russia”. Deutsche Welle. 4 August 2011. Retrieved 28 August 2011.
• ^ “Александр Лукашенко Михаилу Мишустину: Времена нас подталкивают к тому, чтобы решать проблемы, которые у нас существуют”. www.postkomsg.com .
• ^ “Putin, Lukashenka Agree To 28 Union State ‘Programs’”. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty . 4 November 2021.
• ^ “Belarus leader stands with Russia in campaign”. Reuters. 3 July 2022. Archived from the original on 14 February 2023.
• ^ “Russia, Belarus ready to boost union state cooperation amid sanctions”. Reuters. 14 March 2022. Archived from the original on 27 October 2022.
• ^ “Government meeting, 17 March 2022”. Government.ru. 19 March 2022. Archived from the original on 5 April 2023.
• ^ “Putin says Russia and Belarus moving towards unification”. Newsweek . July 2022.
• ^ “Russian Troops Expected To Arrive In Belarus In Days To Create ‘Regional Military Group’”. RFE/RL. 14 October 2022. Archived from the original on 31 October 2022. Retrieved 21 October 2022.
• ^ “Russian air force patrols ally Belarus’ borders”. Reuters. 20 October 2022. Retrieved 21 October 2022.
• ^ “Belarus’s Lukashenko says there can be ’nuclear weapons for everyone’”. Reuters. 29 May 2023. Archived from the original on 31 May 2023. Retrieved 29 May 2023.
• ^ “Russia moves ahead with deployment of tactical nukes in Belarus”. Reuters. 25 May 2023. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 29 May 2023.
• ^ “Putin says Moscow to place nuclear weapons in Belarus, US reacts cautiously”. Reuters. 26 March 2023. Archived from the original on 4 April 2023. Retrieved 29 May 2023.
• ^ “Russia, Belarus to sign landmark security pact, Russian news agency says”. www.reuters.com . 3 December 2024. Retrieved 3 December 2024.
• ^ “Order on signing Russia-Belarus Treaty on security guarantees within the Union State”. www.en.kremlin.ru . 5 December 2024. Retrieved 6 December 2024.
• ^ “Russian, Belarusian leaders approve Union State security concept”. www.tass.com . 6 December 2024. Retrieved 6 December 2024.
• ^ “Meeting of the Supreme State Council of the Union State”. www.en.kremlin.ru . 6 December 2024. Retrieved 6 December 2024.
External links
•
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Union State of Russia and Belarus.
• Portal of the Union State (in English and Russian)
• Portal of the Union State (in Russian)
• • • •
• •
• v • t • e
• Neuri
• Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth
• Belarusian Democratic Republic
• Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic
• Annexation of Western Belarus
• Sovietization of Western Byelorussia
• Cities
• Geology
• Rivers
• Swamps
• Human rights (LGBT )
• Ministry of Internal Affairs
• Presidential Security Service
• Military
• List
• Union State of Russia and Belarus
• Banking
• Energy
• Industry
• Gente Ruthenus, natione Polonus
• Language
• Religion
• Cuisine
• Music
• Cinema
• Media
• Outline • Index • Bibliography
• Category
• Portal
• •
• v • t • e
Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS)
• Belovezh Agreement establishing the CIS (1991)
• Alma-Ata Protocol establishing the CIS (1991)
• CIS Charter (1993)
“Participants ” (11)
1991 agreements parties and “participants” (11)
• Armenia
• Belarus
• Moldova
• Russia
• Ukraine
Additionally the 1993 CIS Charter parties and “members” (9)
• Armenia
• Belarus
• Moldova
• Russia
Self-proclaimed “associate member” as defined in the CIS Charter (1)
1991 agreements parties that do not participate in the summits (2)
• Moldova
• Ukraine
Former “participant” that renounced 1991 agreements and 1993 Charter (1)
• Georgia (1993–2009)
Sports
• Unified Team at the Olympics
• Unified Team at the Paralympics
• CIS national ice hockey team
• CIS national rugby union team
Military
• Collective Security Treaty (1992-1999/2002)
• Joint CIS Air Defense System
• Council of Ministers of Defense of the CIS
Economics
Organization
• Interstate Aviation Committee
• GOST (Euro-Asian Council for Standardization, Metrology and Certification)
Outside the CIS framework
• Georgia
• Eurasian Patent Organization
• Customs Union of the Eurasian Economic Union
• Union State
• Dissolution of the Soviet Union
• Collective Security Treaty Organization
• Collective Rapid Reaction Force
• Category
• •
• v • t • e
Eurasian economic integration Institutions
• Eurasian Economic Commission
• Eurasian Patent Organization
Infrastructure
• EU–Russia Common Space
History
• Comecon
• • •
• •
• v • t • e
• Appanage Russia
• Novgorod
• Vladimir
• Moscow
• Army
• Establishment of Soviet power
• Military
By topic
• Economy
• Internet
• Judicial system of the Russian Empire
• LGBT
• Military
• Postal
Bibliographies
• History of the Early Slavs and Rus’
• Russian Revolution and Civil War
• Stalinism and the Soviet Union
• Soviet Union during World War II
• Russian history (1991–present)
Navigation
• Outline of the Russo-Ukrainian War
• Borders
• Climate
• Fjords
• Geology
• Glaciers
• Islands
• Lakes
• Caucasus
• Urals
• Siberia
• Rivers
• Wildlife
• Foreign relations of Russia since the Russian invasion of Ukraine
• Government (Apparatus )
• Law
• Police
• Prisons
• Political abuse of psychiatry
• Military
• Commonwealth of Independent States
• Collective Security Treaty Organization
• Union State
• Banking
• Energy
• Forestry
• Gambling
• Mining
• Taxation
• Tourism
• Waste
• Abortion
• Alcohol
• Cannabis
• Crime
• Deafness
• Aging
• Doping
• Feminism
• Funerals
• Health
• HIV/AIDS
• LGBTQ
• Illegal
• Labour
• Orphans
• Polygamy
• Racism
• Religion
• Buddhism
• Hinduism
• Islam
• Judaism
• Sikhism
• Scouting
• Slavery
• Smoking
• Suicide
• Wedding
• Women
• in army
• Armorial
• Arts
• Ballet
• Cinema
• Cuisine
• Wine
• Fashion
• Fashion
• Folklore
• Graffiti
• Heraldry
• Internet
• Music
• Nobility
• Anthem
• Flag
• Opera
• Bear
• Winter
• Sports
• Unified Sports Classification System
• Yoga
• Outline
• Category
• Portal
Portals :
• Asia • Belarus • Europe • Russia
• • •
Authority control databases International
• ISNI • VIAF • GND
National
• United States • Czech Republic
Other
• Yale LUX