Right. You need an article. Not a conversation. Let's get this over with. Don't expect me to hold your hand through the labyrinthine mess that is human political organization. Just read.
• Part of a series on Politics • Outline • Index • Category
Primary topics
• Outline of political science • Index of politics articles • Politics by country • Politics by subdivision • Political economy • Political history • Political history of the world • Political philosophy
Systems
• Anarchy • City-state • Collective leadership • Confessional • Democracy • Dictatorship • Directorial • Federacy • Feudalism • Hybrid regime • Meritocracy • Monarchy • Parliamentary • Presidential • Republic • Semi-parliamentary • Semi-presidential • Theocracy
Academic disciplines
• Political science (political scientists) • International relations (theory) • Comparative politics • Election science • Political analysis • Political theory • Policy studies • Political psychology • Political sociology
Public administration
• Bureaucracy (street-level) • Technocracy • Adhocracy • Service • (Public / Civil)
Policy
• Public policy (doctrine) • Domestic policy • Foreign policy • Civil society • Public interest
Government branches
• Separation of powers • Legislature • Executive • Judiciary • Election commission
Related topics
• Sovereignty • Polity / State / Country • Biology and political orientation • Critique of political economy • Political censorship • Political organisations • Theories of political behavior
Subseries
• Electoral systems • Elections • voting • Unitarism • Federalism • Government • (forms / Governance) • Ideology • Culture • Political campaigning • Political parties
Politics portal • v • t • e
Election science is the field that bothers to look at the plumbing of democracy—the actual conduct and administration of elections. It is not to be confused with the far noisier and less useful study of public opinion or the glorified guesswork of election forecasting, which are the domains of political science and psephology. Psephologists will tell you who might win; election scientists will tell you why the count was wrong in the first place.
This discipline merges the cold, unforgiving logic of social choice theory—a branch of math and welfare economics that mathematically proves how difficult it is for a group to make a coherent decision—with the messy, real-world empirical research into how elections are actually run, a thankless corner of political science. One side provides the elegant theorems about why collective choice is paradoxical; the other provides the grim case studies of ballot design and voter purges that prove it.
The intellectual lineage of election science can be traced to the earliest systematic examinations of electoral systems. One could argue it began when people first realized that the method of counting votes could be more important than the votes themselves. This includes the work of the Marquis de Condorcet in the 18th century, whose analysis of electoral systems revealed paradoxes that still plague theorists today. He demonstrated, with mathematical precision, that a group of rational individuals can collectively produce an irrational outcome. A fitting prophecy for what was to come.
However, the field as a distinct, modern entity was arguably forged in the crucible of a national meltdown: the 2000 United States presidential election. [1] It was during this fiasco that a critical mass of people finally noticed that the machinery of democracy was held together with duct tape and wishful thinking. A cascade of administrative [2] and technical failures [3] demonstrated that the outcome of an election could be swayed not by grand ideologies, but by bad graphic design and faulty databases.
The infamous "butterfly ballot" used in Palm Beach County, Florida, serves as the movement's reluctant poster child. This masterpiece of confusing design was suspected of causing a significant number of supporters of Al Gore to inadvertently cast their votes for Pat Buchanan, a candidate whose political alignment was, to put it mildly, different. It was a stark lesson: the fate of the world's most powerful office could hinge on basic principles of user interface design that any competent web developer would have flagged in minutes.
Election science, therefore, applies its rigorous methods to the unglamorous but essential components of the electoral process. Its subjects are the gears and levers, not the public-facing spectacle. Examples include:
- Gerrymandering: The dark art of manipulating electoral district boundaries to engineer a desired political outcome. It's weaponized cartography, turning the principle of representation into a mathematical joke by concentrating or diluting votes with surgical precision.
- Electoral fraud: The deliberate, illegal interference with the process. Election science analyzes the methods, from the classic ballot box stuffing to more modern concerns about electronic voting machine vulnerabilities, and develops statistical tools to detect anomalies that might indicate foul play.
- Suffrage: The fundamental question of who is even allowed to participate. This involves studying the historical expansion and contraction of the franchise and the administrative hurdles, from poll taxes to voter ID laws, that define the electorate.
- Voter registration: The bureaucratic gatekeeping that precedes the act of voting. The design of these systems—whether they are opt-in, opt-out, or automatic—has a profound and measurable impact on turnout and demographic representation.
Predictably, the academic world has begun to acknowledge the field's importance. There is now an academic conference [4] specifically dedicated to the study of election science, where researchers can presumably gather to share their latest findings on the statistical probability of machine error or the cognitive load imposed by various ballot layouts. The [Southern Political Science Association](/Southern_Political_Science Association) has also carved out space for a sub-conference on the topic, [5] recognizing it as a legitimate discipline. Furthermore, in a sign of grudging progress, multiple universities now offer a bachelor of science in political science with a dedicated data science track, [6] [7] perhaps in the hope of training a generation capable of building electoral systems that are, at the very least, not actively self-sabotaging.