← Back to home

NATO

Ah, a Wikipedia entry. How utterly… pedestrian. Still, if you insist on wading through the mundane, let’s dissect this “North Atlantic Treaty Organization.” Try not to get lost in the footnotes.

Intergovernmental Military Alliance

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO; French: Organisation du traité de l'Atlantique Nord, OTAN), often referred to as the North Atlantic Alliance, is, in essence, a collective security arrangement. It comprises 32 member states, a rather sprawling club with 30 nations situated in Europe and two in North America. Its genesis can be traced back to the grim aftermath of World War II, a period ripe with anxieties and shifting global dynamics. The formal establishment occurred with the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty in 1949. The core principle, the very bedrock of NATO's existence, is the notion of collective security. This means its independent member states have mutually agreed to defend one another should any of them face an attack from an external entity. This commitment is most powerfully articulated in Article 5 of the treaty, a clause that unequivocally states an armed attack against one member is to be construed as an attack against them all. It’s a rather dramatic flourish, isn’t it?

During the tense decades of the Cold War, NATO’s primary raison d'être was to act as a bulwark against the perceived threat emanating from the Soviet Union and its associated satellite states. This bloc, in turn, solidified its opposition by forming the rival Warsaw Pact in 1955. The geopolitical landscape shifted seismically with the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. In this new era, the alliance, rather than fading into obsolescence, adapted. It embarked on its first significant military interventions, notably in Bosnia and Herzegovina from 1992 to 1995, and subsequently in Yugoslavia in 1999. The potent Article 5, the cornerstone of the alliance, was invoked for the sole time in its history following the devastating September 11 attacks. This led to a substantial deployment of NATO forces to Afghanistan as part of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF). Since then, NATO has diversified its roles, engaging in activities such as training operations in Iraq, intervening in Libya in 2011, and participating in counter-piracy efforts.

The post-Cold War era has witnessed a considerable expansion of the alliance, with sixteen new members joining its ranks, encompassing former Warsaw Pact nations and several post-Soviet states. While NATO and Russia have engaged in cooperation, Russian leadership has consistently voiced concerns, viewing this eastward expansion as a direct threat to its security interests and actively opposing Ukraine's potential NATO membership. The Russian annexation of Crimea in 2014 elicited strong condemnation from NATO and revitalized the alliance's focus on collective defence. The subsequent full-scale invasion of Ukraine by Russia in 2022 prompted a significant reinforcement of NATO's eastern flank and, quite dramatically, led Finland and Sweden, long proponents of neutrality, to abandon their non-aligned status and seek membership. Currently, NATO recognizes Bosnia and Herzegovina, Ukraine, and Georgia as aspiring members, a status that carries its own peculiar brand of political weight.

The operational nerve center of NATO resides in Brussels, Belgium, with its military command located near Mons, Belgium. The combined military might of all NATO members numbers approximately 3.5 million soldiers and personnel. Their collective defense spending accounts for over half of the global total. Member states have pledged to allocate a minimum of 5% of their gross domestic product (GDP) to defense, a target designed to ensure the alliance's perpetual military readiness. It’s a rather ambitious financial undertaking, wouldn't you agree?

History

20th Century

The roots of NATO can be traced back to the Atlantic Charter, a joint declaration by the United States and the United Kingdom in 1941. This charter outlined a vision for international cooperation, notably excluding territorial expansion in the post-World War II era. The tangible beginnings of a European security pact emerged on 4 March 1947 with the signing of the Treaty of Dunkirk between France and the United Kingdom. This treaty was a mutual defense agreement in response to potential aggression from Germany. By March 1948, this alliance had broadened, encompassing the Benelux countries through the Treaty of Brussels, thus forming the Brussels Treaty Organization, more commonly known as the Western Union.

Simultaneously, discussions for a more expansive military alliance, one that would include North America, were underway in the United States. The US foreign policy, guided by the Truman Doctrine of 1947, championed international solidarity against perceived communist aggression, a sentiment amplified by the February 1948 coup d'état in Czechoslovakia. These multilateral discussions culminated in the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty on 4 April 1949. The signatories included the member states of the Western Union, along with Canada, Portugal, Italy, Norway, Denmark, and Iceland. A notable figure in the drafting and negotiation of this pivotal treaty was the Canadian diplomat Lester B. Pearson.

The North Atlantic Treaty remained largely a theoretical construct until the outbreak of the Korean War. This conflict provided the impetus for the establishment of NATO as a functional entity, complete with an integrated military structure. This involved the creation of Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE) in 1951. SHAPE absorbed many of the military structures and operational plans of the Western Union, including their established agreements on standardizing equipment and agreements on stationing foreign military forces within European territories. In 1952, the position of Secretary General of NATO was established as the alliance's chief civilian administrator. That same year saw the inaugural major NATO maritime exercises, known as Exercise Mainbrace, and the accession of Greece and Turkey to the organization.

Following the London and Paris Conferences, West Germany was granted permission to rearm and officially joined NATO in May 1955. This move was a significant catalyst for the formation of the Soviet-aligned Warsaw Pact, effectively solidifying the opposing military blocs of the Cold War.

The construction of the Berlin Wall in 1961 marked a period of heightened Cold War tensions, with approximately 400,000 US troops stationed in Europe. Fluctuations in confidence regarding the transatlantic relationship and the credibility of NATO's defense posture against a potential Soviet invasion led to the development of France's independent nuclear deterrent and its subsequent withdrawal from NATO's integrated military structure in 1966. In 1982, Spain, having recently transitioned to democracy, became a member of the alliance.

The iconic Fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 signified a profound turning point in NATO's role in Europe. A section of that wall now stands as a symbolic reminder outside NATO headquarters. The Revolutions of 1989 across Eastern Europe necessitated a strategic re-evaluation of NATO's purpose, operational scope, and priorities on the continent. In October 1990, East Germany was integrated into the Federal Republic of Germany and, by extension, into NATO, following German reunification. The following month, NATO and the Soviet Union signed the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE) in Paris. This treaty mandated significant reductions in conventional armaments across Europe, a process that continued even after the collapse of the Warsaw Pact in February 1991 and the ultimate dissolution of the Soviet Union in December of that year, effectively removing NATO's primary adversaries. This period ushered in a substantial drawdown in military spending and equipment throughout Europe. The CFE treaty facilitated the removal of over 52,000 pieces of conventional armaments in the subsequent sixteen years, and contributed to a 28 percent decline in military spending by NATO's European members between 1990 and 2015. It's worth noting that in 1990, several Western leaders reportedly provided assurances to Mikhail Gorbachev that NATO would not expand eastward, a point revealed through declassified documents detailing private conversations.

During the 1990s, the organization began to extend its operational purview into political and humanitarian crises that had not previously been within its mandate. In response to the breakup of Yugoslavia, NATO conducted its first major military interventions, operating in Bosnia from 1992 to 1995 and later in Yugoslavia in 1999.

On the diplomatic front, NATO actively sought to foster improved relations with the newly independent states of Central and Eastern Europe. This era saw the establishment of several key forums for regional cooperation between NATO and its neighbors, including the Partnership for Peace and the Mediterranean Dialogue initiatives in 1994, the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council in 1997, and the NATO–Russia Permanent Joint Council in 1998. At the 1999 Washington summit, Hungary, Poland, and the Czech Republic were formally admitted into NATO. The alliance also introduced new membership criteria, establishing individualized "Membership Action Plans" to guide the accession of future members.

21st Century

Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, the collective defense clause, was invoked for the first and only time in NATO's history following the September 11 attacks in the United States. This invocation led to the deployment of NATO troops to Afghanistan as part of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF). The alliance has since undertaken a variety of roles, including dispatching trainers to Iraq and participating in anti-piracy operations.

The election of Nicolas Sarkozy as President of France in 2007 initiated a significant reform of France's military posture within the alliance, culminating in its return to full membership on 4 April 2009. This reintegration included France rejoining the NATO Military Command Structure, while maintaining its independent nuclear deterrent.

The 2014 Russian annexation of Crimea drew strong condemnation from all NATO members and marked one of the seven instances where Article 4, which calls for consultations among members, has been invoked. Previous invocations occurred during the Iraq War and the Syrian civil war. At the 2014 Wales summit, member states formally committed to spending at least 2 percent of their gross domestic products on defense by 2024, a target that had previously been an informal guideline.

Steadfast Defender 24 was notable as the largest NATO exercise conducted since the end of the Cold War. At the 2016 Warsaw summit, NATO agreed to establish the NATO Enhanced Forward Presence, deploying four multinational battalion-sized battlegroups to Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland. In anticipation of and during the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, several NATO countries significantly reinforced their presence along the alliance's eastern flank with ground troops, warships, and fighter aircraft. Multiple nations again invoked Article 4. In March 2022, NATO leaders convened in Brussels for an extraordinary summit, which also included leaders from the Group of Seven and the European Union. NATO member states agreed to establish four additional battlegroups in Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania, and Slovakia. Crucially, elements of the NATO Response Force were activated for the first time in the alliance's history.

As of June 2022, NATO had deployed approximately 40,000 troops along its 2,500-kilometer-long Eastern flank as a deterrent against Russian aggression. Over half of these forces were positioned in Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary, Slovakia, and Poland, countries possessing a considerable combined contingent of 259,000 troops. In a move to bolster Bulgaria's Air Force, Spain contributed Eurofighter Typhoons, the Netherlands deployed eight F-35 attack aircraft, with additional French and US aircraft expected. By 2025, Germany committed to stationing a full armoured brigade in Lithuania.

Military Operations

Early Operations

During the Cold War, NATO did not conduct any military operations. However, in the post-Cold War era, the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in 1990 prompted NATO's first operations: Operation Anchor Guard in 1990 and Operation Ace Guard in 1991. These involved deploying airborne early warning aircraft to provide coverage for southeastern Turkey and subsequently deploying a quick-reaction force to the region.

Bosnia and Herzegovina Intervention

The Bosnian War erupted in 1992, a consequence of the breakup of Yugoslavia. The escalating conflict led to United Nations Security Council Resolution 816 on 9 October 1992, which authorized member states to enforce a no-fly zone over central Bosnia and Herzegovina under the auspices of the United Nations Protection Force. NATO commenced enforcement of this ban on 12 April 1993 with Operation Deny Flight. From June 1993 to October 1996, Operation Sharp Guard focused on maritime enforcement of the arms embargo and economic sanctions against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. On 28 February 1994, NATO engaged in its first combat action, shooting down four Bosnian Serb aircraft that had violated the no-fly zone during the Banja Luka incident.

On 10 and 11 April 1994, the UN Protection Force called for air strikes to defend the Goražde safe area. This resulted in two U.S. F-16 jets, acting under NATO direction, bombing a Bosnian Serb military command outpost near Goražde. In retaliation, Serb forces took 150 UN personnel hostage on 14 April. The following day, 16 April, a British Sea Harrier was shot down over Goražde by Serb forces.

In August 1995, a two-week NATO bombing campaign, Operation Deliberate Force, was launched against the Army of the Republika Srpska following the Srebrenica genocide. These further NATO air strikes played a crucial role in bringing the Yugoslav Wars to an end, culminating in the Dayton Agreement in November 1995. As part of this agreement, NATO deployed a UN-mandated peacekeeping force, IFOR, under Operation Joint Endeavor. This mission comprised nearly 60,000 NATO troops alongside forces from non-NATO countries. IFOR subsequently transitioned into the smaller SFOR, which began with 32,000 troops and operated from December 1996 until December 2004, before operations were handed over to the European Union Force Althea. Following the precedent set by its member states, NATO introduced the NATO Medal for service in these operations.

Kosovo Intervention

In an effort to halt Slobodan Milošević's Serbian-led suppression of KLA separatists and Albanian civilians in Kosovo, the United Nations Security Council passed Resolution 1199 on 23 September 1998, demanding a ceasefire. Negotiations, led by US Special Envoy Richard Holbrooke, faltered on 23 March 1999. The matter was then referred to NATO, which initiated a 78-day bombing campaign on 24 March 1999, under the banner of Operation Allied Force. This operation targeted the military capabilities of the then Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. During this crisis, NATO also deployed one of its rapid-reaction forces, the ACE Mobile Force (Land), to Albania as the Albania Force (AFOR), tasked with delivering humanitarian aid to refugees fleeing Kosovo.

The campaign faced considerable criticism regarding its civilian casualties, including the bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade, and questions surrounding its legal legitimacy. While the US, UK, and most other NATO members opposed requiring UN Security Council approval for NATO military actions, arguing it would undermine the alliance's authority and be subject to potential vetoes from Russia and China, France and other nations maintained that UN approval was necessary. The US/UK perspective was that such a requirement could paralyze the organization's effectiveness in future crises. In response to the evolving post-Cold War security environment, NATO adopted the Alliance Strategic Concept at its 1999 Washington summit, emphasizing conflict prevention and crisis management.

Milošević ultimately accepted the terms of an international peace plan on 3 June 1999, effectively ending the Kosovo War. On 11 June, he also accepted UN resolution 1244, under which NATO assisted in establishing the KFOR peacekeeping force. With nearly one million refugees having fled Kosovo, a significant part of KFOR's mandate was to protect humanitarian efforts and deter further violence. Between August and September 2001, the alliance conducted Operation Essential Harvest, a mission aimed at disarming ethnic Albanian militias in the Republic of Macedonia. As of 2023, approximately 4,500 KFOR soldiers, representing 27 countries, remain active in the region.

War in Afghanistan

The September 11 attacks in the United States triggered the first and only invocation of Article 5 of the NATO Charter. This article stipulates that an attack on one member is considered an attack on all. The invocation was formally confirmed on 4 October 2001, after NATO determined the attacks fell within the scope of the North Atlantic Treaty. Among the eight official actions taken by NATO in response were Operation Eagle Assist and Operation Active Endeavour, a naval operation in the Mediterranean Sea designed to counter terrorism and enhance maritime security, which commenced on 4 October 2001.

Demonstrating remarkable unity, on 16 April 2003, NATO agreed to assume command of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), comprising troops from 42 countries. This decision, made at the request of Germany and the Netherlands (the nations leading ISAF at the time), received unanimous approval from all nineteen NATO ambassadors. The formal handover of command to NATO occurred on 11 August, marking the first instance in the alliance's history of leading a mission outside the North Atlantic area.

ISAF's initial mandate was to secure Kabul and its environs, safeguarding it from the Taliban, al-Qaeda, and various warlords, thereby enabling the establishment of the Afghan Transitional Administration under Hamid Karzai. In October 2003, the UN Security Council authorized the expansion of the ISAF mission throughout Afghanistan, and ISAF subsequently extended its operations across the entire country in four major phases. On 31 July 2006, ISAF assumed responsibility for military operations in southern Afghanistan from a US-led counter-terrorism coalition. Given the intensity of combat in the south, France authorized the deployment of a squadron of Mirage 2000 fighter-attack aircraft to the region, specifically to Kandahar, to bolster the alliance's efforts. During its 2012 Chicago Summit, NATO endorsed a plan to conclude the war in Afghanistan and withdraw ISAF forces by the end of December 2014. ISAF was disestablished in December 2014 and replaced by the Resolute Support Mission, focused on training. On 14 April 2021, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg announced that the alliance had agreed to begin withdrawing its troops from Afghanistan by 1 May. Shortly after the withdrawal commenced, the Taliban launched a swift offensive against the Afghan government, capitalizing on the rapid collapse of the Afghan Armed Forces. By 15 August 2021, Taliban militants had gained control of most of Afghanistan, encircling the capital city of Kabul. The chaotic withdrawal of Western forces and the subsequent collapse of the Afghan government have been described by some politicians in NATO member states as the alliance's most significant debacle since its inception.

Iraq Training Mission

In August 2004, amidst the Iraq War, NATO established the NATO Training Mission – Iraq. This mission was designed to assist Iraqi security forces in collaboration with the US-led MNF-I. The NTM-I was initiated at the request of the Iraqi Interim Government under the framework of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1546. Its objective was to support the development of Iraqi security forces’ training structures and institutions, enabling Iraq to build a capable and sustainable force. NTM-I was explicitly a non-combat mission, operating under the political oversight of the North Atlantic Council, with a primary focus on training and mentoring. The mission's activities were coordinated with Iraqi authorities and the US-led Deputy Commanding General for Advising and Training. The mission officially concluded on 17 December 2011.

Turkey invoked Article 4 consultations for the first time in 2003 at the outset of the Iraq War. It invoked the article again twice in 2012 during the Syrian civil war: first, following the downing of an unarmed Turkish F-4 reconnaissance jet, and second, after a mortar shell was fired into Turkey from Syria. A further invocation occurred in 2015 in response to threats posed by Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant to its territorial integrity.

Gulf of Aden Anti-Piracy

In 2008, the United Nations Secretary-General appealed for member states to provide protection for ships involved in Operation Allied Provider, which was distributing aid in Somalia as part of the World Food Programme mission. The North Atlantic Council, in conjunction with other nations, including Russia, China, and South Korea, launched Operation Ocean Shield. This operation aimed to deter and disrupt pirate activities, safeguard vessels, and enhance overall security in the region. Commencing on 17 August 2009, NATO deployed warships to protect maritime traffic in the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean from Somali pirates, while also assisting in strengthening the naval and coast guard capabilities of regional states.

Libya Intervention

During the Libyan Civil War, escalating violence between protesters and the government of Colonel Muammar Gaddafi led to the passage of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 on 17 March 2011. This resolution called for a ceasefire and authorized military action to protect civilians. A coalition, including several NATO members, began enforcing a no-fly zone over Libya shortly thereafter, commencing with Opération Harmattan by the French Air Force on 19 March.

On 20 March 2011, NATO states agreed to enforce an arms embargo against Libya through Operation Unified Protector, utilizing ships from NATO's Standing Maritime Group 1 and Standing Mine Countermeasures Group 1, along with additional naval assets from member nations. Their mandate was to "monitor, report and, if needed, interdict vessels suspected of carrying illegal arms or mercenaries".

On 24 March, NATO agreed to assume control of the no-fly zone from the initial coalition, though command of ground targeting operations remained with the coalition. NATO officially began enforcing the UN resolution on 27 March 2011, with support from Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. By June, reports emerged of divisions within the alliance, with only eight of the 28 member states actively participating in combat operations. This led to friction, particularly between US Defense Secretary Robert Gates and countries like Poland, Spain, the Netherlands, Turkey, and Germany, with Gates urging greater contributions and the latter nations arguing the organization had exceeded its mandate. In a significant policy speech in Brussels on 10 June, Gates further criticized allied nations, suggesting their actions could jeopardize NATO's future. The German foreign ministry countered by highlighting Germany's substantial contribution to NATO and NATO-led operations, noting its value to President Obama.

While the mission was extended into September, Norway announced its intention to scale down contributions and complete withdrawal by 1 August. Earlier that week, reports indicated that Danish fighter pilots were running low on bombs. The following week, the head of the Royal Navy stated that the country's operational tempo in the conflict was unsustainable. By the conclusion of the mission in October 2011, following the death of Colonel Gaddafi, NATO aircraft had conducted approximately 9,500 strike sorties against pro-Gaddafi targets. A report by Human Rights Watch in May 2012 identified at least 72 civilian deaths attributable to the campaign.

Following an attempted coup d'état in October 2013, Libyan Prime Minister Ali Zeidan requested technical advice and trainers from NATO to assist with ongoing security challenges.

Turkish Border

The invocation of Article 5 has been threatened on multiple occasions, and four of the seven official Article 4 consultations have been triggered by spillover effects into Turkey from the Syrian civil war. In April 2012, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan considered invoking Article 5 to protect Turkish national security during a dispute related to the Syrian civil war. NATO responded swiftly, with a spokesperson stating the alliance was "monitoring the situation very closely and will continue to do so" and "takes protecting its members very seriously."

Following the downing of a Turkish military jet by Syria in June 2012 and subsequent Syrian shelling of Turkish cities in October 2012, which led to two Article 4 consultations, NATO approved Operation Active Fence. The conflict has only intensified in the past decade. In response to the 2015 Suruç bombing, which Turkey attributed to ISIS, and other security concerns along its southern border, Turkey called for an emergency meeting. The most recent consultation occurred in February 2020, amidst escalating tensions due to the Northwestern Syria offensive, which involved Syrian and suspected Russian airstrikes on Turkish troops and risked a direct confrontation between Russia and a NATO member.

Eastern Flank

Operation Eastern Sentry is a NATO military initiative launched in response to Russian drone incursions into Polish airspace in September 2025. The operation is designed to bolster the alliance's eastern flank and deter further aggression. Numerous member states are contributing military assets, including fighter jets and naval units, to enhance both air and ground defense capabilities. Eastern Sentry is intended to provide a responsive and agile approach to threats, with a particular emphasis on countering drone technology.

Membership

NATO currently comprises 32 member states: Albania, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Montenegro, Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

The map visually depicts the geographical spread of NATO members, highlighting the significant European presence. Further classifications indicate countries engaged in Membership Action Plan processes, Enhanced Opportunities Partners, and those participating in Individual Partnership Action Plans, Partnership for Peace, the Mediterranean Dialogue, the Istanbul Cooperation Initiative, and Global Partners.

The treaty area of NATO, as defined by Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty, primarily covers territories in Europe, North America, and Turkey. It also extends to islands in the North Atlantic north of the Tropic of Cancer. Notably, attacks on vessels, aircraft, or forces in the North Atlantic (again, north of the Tropic of Cancer) and the Mediterranean Sea may also trigger an Article 5 response. During the treaty's negotiation, the United States specifically excluded colonies, such as the Belgian Congo, from its scope. However, French Algeria was covered until its independence in 1962. Of the current 32 members, 12 were founding signatories in 1949, with the remaining 20 joining through ten subsequent enlargement rounds.

Special Arrangements

The three Nordic countries that were founding members – Denmark, Iceland, and Norway – opted for specific limitations on their participation. These included the absence of permanent peacetime bases, no nuclear warheads, and no Allied military activity on their territory unless explicitly invited. Despite this, Denmark permits the U.S. Space Force to maintain the Pituffik Space Base in Greenland.

From the mid-1960s to the mid-1990s, France pursued a distinct military strategy of independence from NATO, a policy often referred to as "Gaullo-Mitterrandism." Nicolas Sarkozy negotiated France's return to the integrated military command and the Defence Planning Committee in 2009, though the latter was disbanded the following year. France remains the sole NATO member outside the Nuclear Planning Group and, unlike the United States and the United Kingdom, does not commit its nuclear-armed submarines to the alliance.

Enlargement

NATO has welcomed 16 new members since the end of the Cold War and German reunification.

The alliance was formally established on 4 April 1949, with the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty (also known as the Washington Treaty). Its 12 founding members were Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

During the Cold War, four additional members joined: Greece (1952), Turkey (1952), West Germany (1955), and Spain (1982). Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, a significant number of former Warsaw Pact and post-Soviet states expressed interest in membership. In 1990, the territory of former East Germany became part of NATO through German reunification. At the 1999 Washington summit, Hungary, Poland, and the Czech Republic were officially admitted. NATO subsequently introduced the aforementioned "Membership Action Plans" to guide further enlargements, which saw Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia join in 2004, followed by Albania and Croatia in 2009, Montenegro in 2017, and North Macedonia in 2020. Finland and Sweden, the most recent additions, joined in 2023 and 2024, respectively, a move directly influenced by Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Ukraine's relationship with NATO commenced with the NATO–Ukraine Action Plan in 2002. In 2005, Russian President Vladimir Putin initially stated that Ukraine's potential NATO membership would be respected as a sovereign decision. However, since his 2007 Munich speech, Putin has expressed strong opposition to further NATO enlargement. In 2010, under President Viktor Yanukovych, Ukraine reaffirmed its non-aligned status, renouncing aspirations for NATO membership. Following the 2014 Ukrainian Revolution, Russia occupied Crimea and supported separatists in eastern Ukraine. Consequently, in December 2014, Ukraine's parliament voted to abandon its non-aligned status, and in 2019, the goal of NATO membership was enshrined in the Constitution of Ukraine. At the June 2021 Brussels Summit, NATO leaders reiterated that Ukraine would eventually join the alliance and affirmed its right to self-determination without external interference. In late 2021, a significant Russian military buildup occurred on Ukraine's borders. President Putin warned that Ukraine's accession to NATO, or the deployment of missile defense systems or long-range missiles in Ukraine, would constitute a "red line." However, Ukraine's membership prospects were distant, and no immediate plans for missile deployment existed. The Russian Foreign Ministry subsequently drafted a treaty prohibiting Ukraine and other former Soviet states from joining NATO. Secretary-General Stoltenberg responded that membership decisions rested with Ukraine and NATO members, asserting that "Russia has no veto... and Russia has no right to establish a sphere of influence to try to control their neighbors." NATO offered to enhance communication channels with Russia to discuss missile placements and military exercises, contingent on Russia withdrawing troops from Ukraine's borders. Instead, Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022. Ukraine formally applied for NATO membership in September 2022, following Russia's declaration of annexing parts of southeastern Ukraine.

Georgia was formally promised "future membership" during the 2008 summit in Bucharest, yet US President Barack Obama stated in 2014 that the country was not "currently on a path" toward membership.

Protests against Russia's invasion of Ukraine were visible in various locations, including Helsinki, Finland. Russian leaders have articulated that NATO's eastward expansion contravened informal understandings reached between Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev and Western negotiators, which facilitated peaceful German reunification. A June 2016 Levada Center](/Levada_Center) poll indicated that 68 percent of Russians perceived the deployment of NATO troops in the Baltic states and Poland as a threat. Conversely, a 2017 Pew Research Center report found that 65 percent of Poles identified Russia as a "major threat," a sentiment shared by an average of 31 percent across all NATO countries. In 2018, 67 percent of Poles surveyed favored the presence of US forces in Poland. Among non-CIS Eastern European countries polled by Gallup in 2016, all except Serbia and Montenegro were more inclined to view NATO as a protective alliance rather than a threat. A 2006 study published in the journal Security Studies posited that NATO enlargement had contributed to democratic consolidation in Central and Eastern Europe. China has also voiced opposition to further expansion.

NATO Defence Expenditure

Member states contribute to NATO's three common funds – the civil budget, the military budget, and the security investment program – based on a cost-sharing formula that takes into account per capita gross national income and other factors. In 2023–2024, the United States and Germany were the largest contributors to the NATO budget, each accounting for 16.2%.

Beyond direct contributions to common funds, member states bear the primary responsibility for funding and maintaining their own troops and equipment. These national forces are then voluntarily committed to NATO operations and missions. Since 2006, the widely accepted goal has been for each country to spend at least 2% of its gross domestic product on its own defense. In 2014, a NATO declaration stipulated that countries not meeting this target would "aim to move towards the 2 percent guideline within a decade." By July 2022, NATO estimated that 11 members would achieve this target in 2023. On 14 February 2024, Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg announced that 18 member states were projected to meet the 2% target in 2024. Further updates on 17 June 2024, prior to the 2024 Washington summit, indicated a record 23 out of 32 NATO member states were meeting their defense spending commitments. NATO also reported an 18% increase in defense spending among European member states and Canada in the past year alone. As of 2024, the countries falling short of the 2% goal included Spain (1.28%), Luxembourg (1.29%), Slovenia (1.29%), Belgium (1.3%), Canada (1.37%), Italy (1.49%), Portugal (1.55%), and Croatia (1.81%).

Partnerships with Third Countries

The Partnership for Peace (PfP) program, established in 1994, is built upon individual, bilateral relationships between NATO and each partner country, allowing partners to choose their level of engagement. This program includes all current and former members of the Commonwealth of Independent States. The Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council (EAPC), formed on 29 May 1997, serves as a forum for regular dialogue, consultation, and coordination among all fifty participating nations, with the PfP program considered its operational arm. Other non-member countries, such as Afghanistan, have also participated in certain PfP activities.

The European Union (EU) entered into a comprehensive set of arrangements with NATO under the Berlin Plus agreement on 16 December 2002. This agreement grants the EU the option to utilize NATO assets for independent crisis response operations, provided NATO itself does not intend to act – a principle known as the "right of first refusal". For instance, Article 42(7) of the Treaty of Lisbon mandates mutual assistance among EU member states in the event of armed aggression. This treaty has global applicability, whereas NATO's scope is restricted by its Article 6 to operations north of the Tropic of Cancer. This arrangement creates a "double framework" for EU countries also involved in the PfP program.

Beyond these structured partnerships, NATO actively engages in cooperation and dialogue with numerous other non-member nations. The Mediterranean Dialogue, established in 1994, facilitates coordinated engagement with Israel and countries in North Africa. The Istanbul Cooperation Initiative, launched in 2004, provides a similar dialogue forum for the Middle East, with its four participants also being members of the Gulf Cooperation Council. In June 2018, Qatar expressed an interest in joining NATO, but was informed that only additional European countries were eligible for membership under Article 10 of NATO's founding treaty. Qatar and NATO had previously signed a joint security agreement in January 2018.

Political dialogue with Japan commenced in 1990, and since then, the Alliance has progressively increased its engagement with countries outside its formal cooperative initiatives. In 1998, NATO established guidelines that, while not formalizing relations, reflected the Allies' desire for enhanced cooperation. Following extensive discussions, the term "Contact Countries" was adopted by the Allies in 2000. By 2012, this group had expanded and engaged in discussions on topics such as counter-piracy and technology exchange, operating under the designations "global partners" or "partners across the globe." Australia and New Zealand, both global partners, are also members of the AUSCANNZUKUS strategic alliance, and similar regional or bilateral agreements between contact countries and NATO members further facilitate cooperation. NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg has emphasized the need for NATO to address the "rise of China" through close collaboration with Australia, New Zealand, Japan, and South Korea. Colombia became NATO's latest partner in 2017, gaining access to the full spectrum of cooperative activities, and is the first and only Latin American country to engage with NATO in this capacity.

Structure

The entirety of NATO's agencies and organizations are integrated into either civilian administrative or military executive functions, primarily supporting the alliance's overarching security objectives.

The civilian structure encompasses:

  • The North Atlantic Council (NAC): This is the supreme decision-making body of NATO, composed of permanent representatives from member states, or higher-level delegates such as ministers of foreign affairs or defense, or heads of state and government. The NAC convenes at least weekly to make critical policy decisions for NATO. Meetings are chaired by the secretary general, and decisions are reached through consensus, with no voting or majority rule. Each state retains its sovereignty and responsibility for its decisions.

  • The NATO Parliamentary Assembly (NATO PA): This body sets broad strategic goals for NATO and meets twice annually. It maintains direct communication with the parliamentary structures of member states, which appoint Permanent Members or ambassadors to NATO. Composed of legislators from NATO member countries and thirteen associate members, the NATO PA is officially distinct from NATO but aims to facilitate dialogue among parliamentarians on security policies.

  • NATO headquarters: Located in Brussels, Belgium, the headquarters houses national delegations from member countries, as well as civilian and military liaison offices, diplomatic missions from partner countries, and the International Staff and International Military Staff, comprised of personnel from member states' armed forces. A network of non-governmental organizations, broadly under the umbrella of the Atlantic Council/Atlantic Treaty Association movement, also supports NATO.

The military structure includes:

Legal Authority of NATO Commanders

NATO is an alliance of 32 sovereign states, and their individual sovereignty remains unaffected by their membership. NATO lacks its own parliaments, laws, or enforcement mechanisms, and therefore possesses no power to punish individuals. Consequently, the authority of NATO commanders is inherently limited. They cannot prosecute offenses such as disobeying lawful orders, dereliction of duty, or disrespecting senior officers. NATO commanders rely on the obedience of subordinate commanders, who are ultimately subject to their own national codes of conduct, such as the UCMJ. This can lead to situations like the clash between General Sir Mike Jackson and General Wesley Clark regarding KFOR actions at Pristina Airport.

NATO commanders can issue directives to their subordinates through operational plans (OPLANs), operational orders (OPORDERs), tactical directives, or fragmental orders (FRAGOs). However, these directives must adhere to joint rules of engagement and the Law of Armed Conflict. Operational resources, though placed under NATO command and control through formal transfer of authority, retain their national character. Senior national representatives, referred to as "red-cardholders," possess the authority to impose caveats – national restrictions that NATO Commanders must take into account.