Latin America

Region of the Americas

"Latinoamérica", "América Latina", and "LatAm" are terms that frequently redirect to this comprehensive overview. For the collective term referring to its inhabitants, one might consult the article on Latin Americans. Should your interest lie in the musical realm, the composition Latinoamérica (song) awaits, while cinematic pursuits might lead you to the film America Latina. For aviation enthusiasts, LATAM denotes a prominent Chilean airline, and for a broader spectrum of related topics, the LATAM (disambiguation) page stands ready.

It is important, for the sake of clarity, not to confuse this region with Ibero-America, a related but distinct geographical and cultural designation.

---

Note from a less than enthusiastic editor: This article, like a perpetually overflowing inbox, currently contains an abundance of tables, charts, and datasets that, regrettably, lack sufficient context or explanation. A more illuminating discussion on this matter can likely be found on the associated talk page. Assistance in transforming these statistical dumps into coherent, engaging prose text would be... appreciated. (July 2025) (For those truly invested, guidance on how and when to remove this message is available.)

---

Latin America

Latin America, as a cultural region, occupies a significant portion of the Americas, defined less by strict geographical boundaries and more by its shared linguistic and historical heritage. Its sprawling territory encompasses a vast area of approximately 20,111,457 square kilometers (or 7,765,077 square miles) [1]. This expansive land is home to a considerable population, estimated at 656,098,097 in 2021 [2] [3] [a], positioning it as the third most populous region by political entity and the fourth most populous by continent. Such a population density averages out to roughly 31 individuals per square kilometer (or 80 per square mile).

Economically, Latin America presents a complex picture. Its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) based on Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) is projected to reach an impressive $14.071 trillion in 2024 [4], securing its position as the [4th largest](/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)) globally. However, when viewed on a per capita basis, this translates to$21,684 in 2024 [4], ranking it 63rd globally. Considering nominal GDP, the region's total is estimated at $6.7 trillion in 2024 [4], again placing it [4th globally](/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)). The nominal GDP per capita, at$10,042 in 2024 [4], positions it at 81st worldwide. These figures, while substantial in aggregate, hint at the persistent challenges of wealth distribution within the region.

The vibrant tapestry of Latin America's ethnic groups is a direct legacy of its intricate history. The largest segment, approximately 40%, comprises individuals of mixed Indigenous Amerindian and European heritage, commonly referred to as Mestizo. Following closely are those of predominantly European heritage, accounting for 29%, known as White Latin Americans. A significant 19% of the population consists of individuals with mixed African and European ancestry, or Mulatto. Indigenous peoples of the Americas constitute about 6%, while Afro–Latin Americans make up 5%. A smaller, yet culturally rich, 1% are Asian Latin Americans. The collective demonym for the people of this region is, predictably, Latin American.

Latin America is composed of 20 sovereign nations [b], each contributing to the region's unique character. These include Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela.

Linguistically, the region is dominated by Indo-European tongues, accounting for 96.9% of all languages spoken. Within this, Romance languages are overwhelmingly prevalent at 95%. Spanish, or Castilian, holds sway as the primary language for 60% of the population, while Portuguese is spoken by 33%. A smaller, yet notable, 1% speak French and Haitian Creole. Italo-Dalmatian languages represent 1%, and Papiamento a mere 0.05%. Germanic languages collectively account for 1.5%, with English and its creoles at 1%, German at 0.45%, and Dutch at 0.07%. Indo-Iranian languages, specifically Caribbean Hindustani, make up 0.4%. Significant indigenous language families also persist: Quechuan languages (1%), Tupian languages (1%, primarily Guarani), Mayan languages (0.90%, with Eastern branches like Quichean at 0.55% and Mamean at 0.09%, and Western branches like Cholan–Tzeltalan at 0.19% and Qʼanjobalan at 0.06%, alongside Yucatec at 0.10%), Aymaran languages (0.40%), and Uto-Aztecan languages (0.30%, with Nahuatl at 0.25%). Other indigenous groups include Oto-Manguean languages (0.30%), Arawakan languages (0.06%), Chibchan languages (0.06%), and Araucanian languages (0.03%). Finally, Japanese speakers represent 0.06%.

The sheer geographical spread means Latin America spans a wide array of time zones, from UTC−02:00 in the east to UTC−08:00 in the west. Urbanization has also shaped the region, with sprawling metropolises dominating the landscape. The largest urban areas, in descending order, include São Paulo, Mexico City, Buenos Aires, Rio de Janeiro, Lima, Bogotá, Santiago, Caracas, Belo Horizonte, and Monterrey. For administrative classification, the UN M49 code assigns 419 to Latin America and the Caribbean, 019 to the broader Americas, and 001 to the World.

Latin America, or América Latina in Spanish and Portuguese, and Amérique Latine in French, is fundamentally a cultural region within the Americas. Its defining characteristic is the predominant use of Romance languages, with Spanish and Portuguese leading the linguistic landscape [5] [c]. This definition, deliberately rooted in cultural identity rather than rigid geography, means it encompasses countries across both North and South America. Typically, this includes Mexico, the nations of Central America, the entirety of South America, and significant portions of the Caribbean. More precisely, it often refers to Hispanic America (the Spanish-speaking nations) combined with Brazil [6] [7] [8].

Related terms, though distinct, often cause confusion. The narrower concept of Hispanic America refers exclusively to the Spanish-speaking countries. The broader term, Ibero-America, extends to include all Iberian countries in the Americas and, on occasion, even European nations such as Spain, Portugal, and Andorra. Crucially, English- and Dutch-speaking countries and territories, despite their geographical proximity, are excluded from the definition of Latin America. This means nations like Suriname, Guyana, the Falkland Islands, Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, and Belize are not typically considered part of this cultural sphere [9].

The term "Latin America" itself is not ancient. It was first formally introduced in 1856 during a conference held in Paris, bearing the rather grand title, "Initiative of the Americas: Idea for a Federal Congress of the Republics" (Iniciativa de la América. Idea de un Congreso Federal de las Repúblicas) [d] [10]. This coinage is attributed to the Chilean politician Francisco Bilbao, who envisioned it as a unifying concept for countries sharing a common cultural and linguistic heritage. Its prominence, however, truly surged in the 1860s, conveniently aligning with the imperial ambitions of Napoleon III, whose government found the term useful in justifying France's intervention in the Second Mexican Empire [11]. A historical irony, perhaps, that a term meant to unify against foreign intervention found its initial widespread use in support of it.

Etymology and definitions

The very notion of "Latin America" as a distinct geographical region where Spanish or Portuguese serves as the national language, fostering a shared culture and traditions, can be traced back to the 1830s. It was in the writings of the French Saint-Simonian Michel Chevalier that this concept first took root. Chevalier posited that a segment of the Americas was populated by individuals of a "Latin race", and thus, could naturally align with "Latin Europe". This grand, if somewhat ethnocentric, vision ultimately intertwined with the concept of the Latin Church in a perceived struggle against "Teutonic Europe" and "Anglo-Saxon America", with its particular brand of Anglo-Saxonism, as well as "Slavic Europe" and its pervasive Pan-Slavism [12]. One might wonder if such neat categorizations ever truly served anyone but the categorizers themselves.

However, scholarship has since revealed a more complex and, frankly, more politically charged origin for the term. Historians Arturo Ardao from Uruguay and Miguel Rojas Mix from Chile uncovered evidence suggesting that "Latin America" was in circulation even earlier than previously thought by some, and, crucially, that its initial usage was explicitly in opposition to imperialist designs in the Americas. Ardao meticulously documented this in his 1980 work, Génesis de la idea y el nombre de América latina (Genesis of the Idea and the Name of Latin America) [13]. Similarly, Rojas Mix's 1986 article, "Bilbao y el hallazgo de América latina: Unión continental, socialista y libertaria" (Bilbao and the Finding of Latin America: a Continental, Socialist, and Libertarian Union), provided further corroboration [14]. Michel Gobat reinforces these findings, noting that these scholars, along with Aims McGuinness, "have revealed [that] the term 'Latin America' had already been used in 1856 by Central Americans and South Americans protesting US expansion into the Southern Hemisphere" [15]. Edward Shawcross neatly summarizes their discoveries: "Ardao identified the term in a poem by a Colombian diplomat and intellectual resident in France, José María Torres Caicedo, published on 15 February 1857 in a French based Spanish-language newspaper, while Rojas Mix located it in a speech delivered in France by the radical liberal Chilean politician Francisco Bilbao in June 1856" [16].

By the late 1850s, the term had even made its way to California, which had, by then, become part of the United States. Local newspapers such as El Clamor Público featured Californios writing about América latina and latinoamérica, actively identifying themselves as Latinos – an abbreviated term signifying their "hemispheric membership in la raza latina" [17].

The precise moment the words "Latin" and "America" were first printed together to form "Latin America" is often attributed to the aforementioned 1856 Paris conference, initiated by the Chilean politician Francisco Bilbao [18]. The conference, grandly titled "Initiative of the America. The idea for a Federal Congress of Republics," sought to articulate a unified vision [10]. The subsequent year, the Colombian writer José María Torres Caicedo further cemented the term's usage in his poem, "The Two Americas" [19].

Both Bilbao and Caicedo, in their respective works, issued a rallying cry for the union of all Latin American countries. They saw this as the sole viable defense against further foreign interventions, particularly from the United States. Furthermore, they adamantly rejected European imperialism, perceiving the resurgence of non-democratic forms of government in Europe as yet another looming threat to Latin American nations. It is telling that both authors employed the same word – "despotism" – to characterize the state of European politics at the time. Years later, amidst the French invasion of Mexico, Bilbao penned another significant work, "Emancipation of the Spirit in the Americas." In it, he implored all Latin American nations to lend their support to the Mexican cause against France, unequivocally denouncing French imperialism across Asia, Africa, Europe, and the Americas. He challenged Latin American intellectuals to pursue their "intellectual emancipation" by shedding all French ideas, asserting that France was: "Hypocrite, because she [France] calls herself protector of the Latin race just to subject it to her exploitation regime; treacherous, because she speaks of freedom and nationality, when, unable to conquer freedom for herself, she enslaves others instead!" Thus, as Michel Gobat astutely observes, the term "Latin America" itself carried an "anti-imperial genesis," and its originators were far from endorsing any form of imperialism, whether in the region or anywhere else on the globe [20]. A rather inconvenient truth for those who sought to co-opt the term for their own ends.

Historian Mauricio Tenorio-Trillo delves extensively into the "allure and power" of the very idea of Latin America. He begins with a rather pointed observation: "The idea of 'Latin America' ought to have vanished with the obsolescence of racial theory... But it is not easy to declare something dead when it can hardly be said to have existed," before conceding, with a hint of resignation, "The term is here to stay, and it is important" [21]. Following in the footsteps of Francisco Bilbao, who notably excluded Brazil, Argentina, and Paraguay from his initial conceptualization of Latin America [22], the Chilean historian Jaime Eyzaguirre has criticized the term for "disguising" and "diluting" the distinctly Spanish character of a region (what he would term Hispanic America) by including nations that, in his view, did not share an identical pattern of conquest and colonization [23]. Such debates, it seems, are as enduring as the region itself.

Modern definitions

The definition of "Latin America" remains, to this day, somewhat fluid, a testament to the region's diverse realities and the various lenses through which it is viewed. Several common interpretations exist:

• The Ibero-American, Romance-Catholic Core: In one prevalent definition, Latin America encompasses the countries and territories across the Americas where the populations predominantly speak Spanish or Portuguese, and where Roman Catholicism is the dominant religion. This interpretation often considers the term synonymous with Ibero-America ("Iberian America"). Notably, Puerto Rico, a Spanish-speaking Caribbean territory of the United States acquired from the Spanish Empire after its defeat in the 1898 Spanish–American War, is typically included within this framework. Conversely, this definition explicitly excludes predominantly Protestant English-speaking and Dutch-speaking regions, as well as French-speaking, predominantly Catholic regions. Therefore, countries like Belize, Guyana, and Suriname, alongside various French overseas departments, are not considered part of Latin America under this specific understanding [24]. It's a neat categorization, if perhaps overly simplistic, for those who prefer their cultural boundaries clearly delineated.

• The Romance Language Family: A broader definition extends Latin America to designate the collection of countries in the Americas where any Romance language (that is, a language derived from Latin) predominates: Spanish, Portuguese, or French. This expansive view includes Mexico; the majority of Central America and South America; and within the Caribbean, Cuba, Puerto Rico, the Dominican Republic, and Haiti. French Guiana and the French West Indies are also often, and quite logically, included. By this definition, Latin America essentially comprises all countries in the Americas that were once integral parts of the Spanish, Portuguese, and French Empires [25] [26]. A more inclusive, if slightly less precise, approach.

• The Socioeconomic Continuum (South of the US): A third, even more expansive, interpretation sometimes uses "Latin America" to refer to all of the Americas situated south of the United States. This broad brushstroke thus encompasses the Guianas (French Guiana, Guyana, and Suriname); the Anglophone Caribbean (and Belize); the Francophone Caribbean; and the Dutch Caribbean [citation needed]. This definition shifts emphasis from purely cultural markers to a shared socioeconomic history, characterized by patterns of formal or informal colonialism (see, for example, dependency theory) [27]. It is perhaps for this reason that many sources prefer the alternative, more explicit phrase, "Latin America and the Caribbean", as employed, for instance, in the United Nations geoscheme for the Americas [28] [29] [30]. It attempts to capture a shared experience, even if the cultural nuances differ.

It is generally accepted that Quebec and Acadia, despite being Francophone parts of North America, are typically excluded from the definition of Latin America [31]. The lines, it seems, must be drawn somewhere, even if arbitrarily.

Subregions and countries

The sprawling expanse known as Latin America, a region of immense diversity, can be systematically organized into several distinct subregions. These divisions are not merely academic exercises but reflect deeply embedded differences in geography, political systems (including the varying degrees of democracy present), demographic patterns, and cultural expressions. The most fundamental geographical subregions include North America (specifically, Mexico), Central America, the Caribbean, and South America. The latter, South America, further subdivides into politico-geographical entities such as the Southern Cone, the Guianas, and the historically and geographically significant Andean states. Alternatively, one can categorize the region along linguistic lines, distinguishing between Spanish America and Portuguese America, and, under some definitions, even French America [32].

For those who appreciate order in the face of chaos, a detailed breakdown of the countries and territories that constitute Latin America, complete with their capitals, official names, recent population estimates, land area, population density, and time zones, is provided below. This list primarily adheres to the cultural and linguistic definition, excluding English- and Dutch-speaking nations, with the notable inclusion of Puerto Rico as a non-sovereign but culturally aligned entity.

A Detailed Look at Latin American Nations and Territories:

• Argentina: With its capital in Buenos Aires, Argentina, officially known simply as Argentina, boasts a population of 46,621,847 (2023) [33] across its 2,780,400 km² [34]. This results in a population density of 17 people/km². It operates under the UTC/GMT –3 hours time zone, firmly situated in South America. Its flag, a striking design of light blue and white with the Sun of May, and its national coat of arms reflect a rich history.

• Bolivia: A nation with two capitals, Sucre and La Paz, Bolivia is officially known as Bolivia, Buliwya, Wuliwya, or Volívia in its various official languages. Its 12,186,079 citizens (2023) [33] inhabit 1,098,581 km² [34], leading to a density of 11 people/km². The country observes UTC/GMT –4 hours, nestled within South America. The Bolivian flag features horizontal bands of red, yellow, and green, often with its coat of arms.

• Brazil: The largest nation in the region, Brazil, with its capital Brasília, is simply known as Brasil. Its immense population of 218,689,757 (2023) [33] occupies a vast 8,514,877 km² [34], yielding a density of 26 people/km². Due to its size, Brazil utilizes multiple time zones: UTC/GMT –2 hours (Fernando de Noronha), UTC/GMT –3 hours (Brasília), UTC/GMT –4 hours (Amazonas), and UTC/GMT –5 hours (Acre), all within South America. The distinctive green and yellow flag with its central globe is instantly recognizable.

• Chile: The elongated nation of Chile, with Santiago as its capital, is simply Chile. Its 18,549,457 residents (2023) [33] are spread across 756,102 km² [34], resulting in a density of 25 people/km². Chile also employs multiple time zones: UTC/GMT –3 hours (Magallanes and Chilean Antarctica), UTC/GMT –4 hours (Continental Chile), and UTC/GMT –6 hours (Easter Island), all part of South America. The Chilean flag features a white star on a blue square and a white and red stripe.

• Colombia: The vibrant country of Colombia, with its capital Bogotá, is simply Colombia. Its population stands at 49,336,454 (2023) [33] within an area of 1,141,748 km² [34], giving it a density of 43 people/km². It observes UTC/GMT –5 hours and is located in South America. The Colombian flag is a striking horizontal tricolor of yellow, blue, and red.

• Costa Rica: Central American gem Costa Rica, with its capital San José, is known as Costa Rica. Home to 5,256,612 people (2023) [33] and covering 51,100 km² [34], its density is 103 people/km². It operates under UTC/GMT –6 hours and is a key part of Central America.

• Cuba: The Caribbean island nation of Cuba, with its capital Havana, is simply Cuba. Its population is 10,985,974 (2023) [33] within an area of 109,884 km² [34], resulting in a density of 100 people/km². It observes UTC/GMT –5 hours and is located in the Caribbean.

• Dominican Republic: Another Caribbean nation, the Dominican Republic, with its capital Santo Domingo, is known as República Dominicana. Its 10,790,744 inhabitants (2023) [33] reside within 48,192 km² [34], making it quite dense at 224 people/km². It is in the Caribbean and observes UTC/GMT –4 hours.

• Ecuador: Equatorial Ecuador, with its capital Quito, is simply Ecuador. Its population is 17,483,326 (2023) [33] across 256,369 km² [34], for a density of 68 people/km². It utilizes two time zones: UTC/GMT –5 hours (mainland Ecuador) and UTC/GMT –6 hours (Galápagos Islands), located in South America.

• El Salvador: The smallest Central American nation, El Salvador, with its capital San Salvador, is simply El Salvador. Its 6,602,370 citizens (2023) [33] inhabit 21,041 km² [34], making it exceptionally dense at 314 people/km². It observes UTC/GMT –6 hours and is part of Central America.

• Guatemala: The ancient heartland of the Maya, Guatemala, with its capital Guatemala City, is simply Guatemala. Its population of 17,980,803 (2023) [33] is spread over 108,889 km² [34], giving it a density of 165 people/km². It observes UTC/GMT –6 hours and is located in Central America.

• Honduras: The Central American nation of Honduras, with its capital Tegucigalpa, is simply Honduras. Its 9,571,352 people (2023) [33] reside within 112,492 km² [34], for a density of 85 people/km². It operates under UTC/GMT –6 hours and is part of Central America.

• Mexico: The northernmost Latin American country, Mexico, with its bustling capital Mexico City, is simply México. Its massive population of 129,875,529 (2023) [33] occupies 1,964,375 km² [34], resulting in a density of 66 people/km². Mexico spans several time zones: UTC/GMT –5 hours (Zona Sureste), UTC/GMT –6 hours (Zona Centro), UTC/GMT –7 hours (Zona Pacífico), and UTC/GMT –8 hours (Zona Noroeste), and is considered part of North America.

• Nicaragua: Central American Nicaragua, with its capital Managua, is simply Nicaragua. Its population is 6,359,689 (2023) [33] across 130,373 km² [34], giving it a density of 49 people/km². It observes UTC/GMT -6 hours and is part of Central America.

• Panama: The bridge between continents, Panama, with its capital Panama City, is simply Panamá. Its 4,404,108 residents (2023) [33] are spread over 75,417 km² [34], for a density of 58 people/km². It observes UTC/GMT –5 hours and is located in Central America.

• Paraguay: Landlocked Paraguay, with its capital Asunción, is officially Paraguay or Tetã Paraguái. Its 7,439,863 people (2023) [33] reside within 406,752 km² [34], for a density of 18 people/km². It observes UTC/GMT –4 hours and is part of South America.

• Peru: Andean nation Peru, with its historic capital Lima, is simply Perú. Its population of 32,440,172 (2023) [33] occupies 1,285,216 km² [34], giving it a density of 25 people/km². It observes UTC/GMT –5 hours and is located in South America.

• **Puerto Rico*: This non-sovereign territory, with its capital San Juan, is known as Puerto Rico. Its 3,057,311 inhabitants (2023) [33] are concentrated in 8,870 km² [34], making it very dense at 345 people/km². It observes UTC/GMT –4 hours and is part of the Caribbean.

• Uruguay: The small but significant nation of Uruguay, with its capital Montevideo, is simply Uruguay. Its 3,416,264 citizens (2023) [33] are spread over 176,215 km² [34], for a density of 19 people/km². It observes UTC/GMT –3 hours and is located in South America.

• Venezuela: The South American nation of Venezuela, with its capital Caracas, is simply Venezuela. Its population is 30,518,260 (2023) [33] across 912,050 km² [34], giving it a density of 33 people/km². It observes UTC/GMT –4 hours and is located in South America.

In total, these nations and territories collectively represent a population of 641,565,971 and an area of 19,958,943 km², with an average density of 32 people/km².

Note: Puerto Rico is explicitly noted as not a sovereign state, yet included due to its cultural and linguistic alignment with the region.

History

Pre-Columbian Era and European Conquest

The history of Latin America is a saga spanning millennia, reaching back to the Pre-Columbian era long before the European arrival. This vast and diverse region was a cradle for numerous indigenous peoples, many of whom developed advanced civilizations that left indelible marks on the landscape and human understanding. Most notably, from what is now Mexico and Central America southwards, great empires and cultures flourished. The Olmec, often considered the "mother culture" of Mesoamerica, laid foundational artistic and societal patterns. The Maya civilization, renowned for its sophisticated writing system, mathematics, and astronomy, built monumental cities that still awe visitors today. In the Andean highlands of South America, the Muisca developed complex social structures and exquisite gold craftsmanship. Further north, the Aztecs forged a formidable empire from their capital, Tenochtitlan, demonstrating remarkable organizational and military prowess. To the south, the Inca civilization, stretching across the Andes, created an unparalleled administrative system and extensive road network, all without the aid of a written language in the European sense.

This intricate tapestry of indigenous societies was irrevocably altered with the arrival of Europeans in the late 15th and early 16th centuries. The kingdoms of Spain and Portugal, driven by desires for wealth, glory, and religious zeal, swiftly established vast colonial empires across the continent. With their arrival came the imposition of Roman Catholicism and their respective languages, Spanish and Portuguese, which would become the dominant tongues of the region.

The colonial project was, however, built on a foundation of profound exploitation and violence. Both Spain and Portugal forcibly brought African slaves to their colonies to serve as laborers, particularly in the burgeoning plantation economies and mining operations. Indigenous societies, especially large, settled ones, were ruthlessly exploited for their labor and vast natural resources. The Spanish Crown, in an attempt to maintain control and "purity," regulated immigration, permitting only Christians to travel to the New World. The colonization process itself led to a catastrophic decline in native populations, a consequence of devastating European diseases against which indigenous peoples had no immunity, brutal forced labor regimes, and overt violence. Beyond the physical destruction, colonizers aggressively imposed their culture, often destroying native codices and artwork, erasing centuries of accumulated knowledge and artistic expression. Religion, specifically the imposed Roman Catholicism, played a central, often oppressive, role in everyday colonial life. The Spanish Crown, ever vigilant, ensured religious purity and aggressively prosecuted perceived deviations, such as witchcraft, through institutions like the Inquisition. A rather thorough, if barbaric, re-engineering of entire societies.

Independence and Post-Colonial Challenges

The early 19th century ushered in a period of dramatic change. Inspired by Enlightenment ideals and growing resentment against colonial rule, nearly all areas of Spanish America achieved independence through protracted armed struggles. The notable exceptions were Cuba and Puerto Rico, which remained under Spanish control until the end of the century. Brazil, uniquely, transitioned from a Portuguese colony to an independent monarchy in 1822 under Dom Pedro I, a son of the Portuguese king, only to become a republic much later in the late 19th century.

However, political independence from European monarchies did not automatically translate into widespread social justice or stability. The abolition of black slavery, for instance, was not a uniform outcome across the newly independent nations, lingering in some for decades. The immediate aftermath of independence was largely characterized by profound political and economic instability throughout Spanish America. As powerful regional strongmen, known as Caudillos, began to emerge and consolidate power, the nascent nation-builders paradoxically started to perceive themselves as more modern and progressive than their former European colonizers. There was a discernible shift in political thought, moving away from aristocratic models towards republicanism and democracy, a theoretical framework that promised all citizens, not just the Creole elites, a voice in politics. This burgeoning political discourse, despite its inherent flaws and limitations, played a crucial role in unifying many of the Latin American nations, as people, even the illiterate, would gather in their communities to engage in fervent discussions about political ideals and their practical application within their new nations [35].

Yet, this newfound sovereignty was quickly undermined by a different form of external control. Great Britain and the United States, rapidly expanding their global influence, began to exert significant power in the post-independence era. This often resulted in a subtle but pervasive form of neo-colonialism, where political sovereignty remained nominally intact, but foreign powers wielded considerable economic influence. Newly independent nations found themselves grappling with a litany of internal and interstate conflicts, struggling against persistent economic instability and deeply entrenched social inequality.

The 20th century, rather than offering respite, introduced new complexities. The region experienced frequent U.S. intervention, often driven by geopolitical interests, particularly during the Cold War. This era saw various revolutions, most famously in Cuba, which profoundly influenced Latin American politics and inspired similar movements for social and economic change. The latter half of the 20th century and the early 21st century witnessed a cyclical pattern of political shifts, with movements towards left-wing governments often followed by conservative resurgences, and then, more recently, a renewed wave of left-wing politics sweeping across several countries. A predictable pendulum, swinging back and forth, yet always with a unique Latin American rhythm.

After 2000

The early 2000s in many Latin American countries were marked by a significant political phenomenon, often referred to as the "Pink tide." This period saw a notable rise to power of left-wing political parties and leaders across the region. Prominent figures included Hugo Chávez (1999–2013) in Venezuela, Ricardo Lagos and Michelle Bachelet in Chile, Lula da Silva and Dilma Rousseff from the Workers Party (PT) in Brazil, Néstor Kirchner and his wife Cristina Fernández in Argentina, Tabaré Vázquez and José Mujica in Uruguay, Evo Morales in Bolivia, Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua, Rafael Correa in Ecuador, Fernando Lugo in Paraguay, and Manuel Zelaya in Honduras (who was controversially removed from power by a coup d'état). Mauricio Funes and Salvador Sánchez Cerén in El Salvador also formed part of this wave. These left-leaning politicians frequently identified themselves as socialists, Latin Americanists, or anti-imperialists, often signaling an implicit, or explicit, opposition to U.S. policies towards the region. A tangible manifestation of this ideological alignment was the formation of the eight-member ALBA alliance, or "The Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America" (Spanish: Alianza Bolivariana para los Pueblos de Nuestra América), by some of these nations. The image of a Honduran demonstrator holding a "don't turn left" sign in 2009, however, served as a stark, if premature, warning of the inevitable political tides.

Indeed, following the initial momentum of the pink tide, Latin America experienced a discernible "Conservative wave." In Mexico, the right-wing National Action Party (PAN) secured the presidential election of 2000 with its candidate Vicente Fox, thereby ending the 71-year dominance of the Institutional Revolutionary Party. Fox was succeeded six years later by another conservative, Felipe Calderón (2006–2012), whose administration controversially escalated efforts to combat Mexican drug cartels, thereby instigating the protracted Mexican drug war. Other notable right-wing leaders who ascended to power included Mauricio Macri in Argentina and Michel Temer in Brazil, the latter following the impeachment of the country's first female president, Dilma Rousseff. In Chile, the conservative Sebastián Piñera succeeded the socialist Michelle Bachelet in 2017 [36]. More recently, in 2019, the center-right Luis Lacalle Pou brought an end to 15 years of leftist rule in Uruguay after defeating the Broad Front candidate [37]. The political pendulum, as always, eventually finds its way back.

Economically, the 2000s commodities boom proved highly beneficial for many Latin American economies, providing a much-needed injection of capital and fostering growth. Simultaneously, a significant trend emerged with the rapidly escalating importance of the region's relations with China [38]. However, this period of prosperity was curtailed by the onset of the Great Recession in 2008. The global economic downturn brought an end to the commodity boom, subsequently leading to widespread economic stagnation or outright recession in several countries. Unsurprisingly, a number of the left-wing governments that had ridden the wave of the Pink tide began to lose public support. Venezuela was arguably the worst-hit, plunging into a severe social and economic upheaval that continues to this day [citation needed].

The pervasive issue of corruption also came to a head with charges leveled against the colossal Brazilian conglomerate, Odebrecht. This scandal, known as Operation Car Wash, exposed a vast bribery network that implicated governments across the region, cementing its place as the largest corruption scandal in Latin American history [39]. As of July 2017, high-ranking politicians facing charges included former Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who was arrested [40], and former Peruvian presidents Ollanta Humala and Alejandro Toledo, the latter having fled to the United States before being extradited back to Peru [41].

The COVID-19 pandemic presented an unprecedented political challenge for many already unstable Latin American democracies. Scholars have identified a worrying decline in civil liberties, a direct consequence of governments opportunistically wielding emergency powers. This trend was particularly pronounced in countries characterized by strong presidential regimes, such as Brazil [42]. It seems that even global health crises merely provide new avenues for old power dynamics.

Geography

Environment

The environment of Latin America, a region of unparalleled natural grandeur, has, like most of the world, been profoundly reshaped by human activity. The relentless expansion of agriculture, spurred by both traditional practices and the advent of new agricultural technologies, including the transformative yet controversial Green Revolution, has dramatically altered landscapes. The extraction of vast mineral wealth, the inexorable growth of urban centers, and the ambitious redirection of rivers through the construction of dams for irrigation, drinking water, and hydroelectric power have all left their indelible marks.

However, the 20th century also witnessed the emergence of a growing, increasingly vocal movement dedicated to environmental protection. In response, many governments throughout the region have sought international recognition for their most precious natural sites, leading to numerous inclusions on the UNESCO World Heritage Sites list. Currently, Brazil, Mexico, and Peru lead the region in possessing the greatest number of these designated natural sites [43]. These efforts, while commendable, often feel like a belated attempt to preserve what was once taken for granted.

Visual testaments to the region's natural splendor and ongoing environmental challenges include the majestic Sumidero Canyon in Chiapas, Mexico, a breathtaking natural gorge carved by the Grijalva River. The vibrant avian life of the Neotropical parrot family, exemplified by the Glaucous macaw (often seen alongside the more common hyacinth macaw), serves as a reminder of the rich biodiversity that still persists, albeit under increasing pressure [44].

When examining environmental performance across Latin American countries, certain indicators paint a stark picture. The Environmental Performance Index (EPI) from 2012 provides a snapshot [45], while CO2 emissions per capita from 2009 offer insight into carbon footprints [46].

• Argentina: With an EPI of 56.48, Argentina's CO2 emissions stood at 4.14 tons per capita.
• Bolivia: Bolivia registered an EPI of 54.57 and significantly lower CO2 emissions at 1.31 tons per capita.
• Brazil: Brazil, a nation of immense biodiversity, achieved a relatively strong EPI of 60.90, with CO2 emissions at 1.74 tons per capita.
• Chile: Chile's EPI was 55.34, and its CO2 emissions were higher at 3.84 tons per capita.
• Colombia: Colombia showed a robust EPI of 62.33, with CO2 emissions at 1.33 tons per capita, indicating a relatively cleaner energy mix.
• Costa Rica: Often lauded for its environmental policies, Costa Rica demonstrated the highest EPI in the region at 69.03, with CO2 emissions at 1.37 tons per capita.
• Cuba: Cuba's EPI was 56.48, and its CO2 emissions were 2.40 tons per capita.
• Dominican Republic: The Dominican Republic recorded an EPI of 52.44 and CO2 emissions of 1.79 tons per capita.
• Ecuador: Ecuador's EPI was 60.55, with CO2 emissions at 2.09 tons per capita.
• El Salvador: El Salvador had an EPI of 52.08 and low CO2 emissions at 1.10 tons per capita.
• Guatemala: Guatemala's EPI was 51.88, with CO2 emissions at 1.03 tons per capita.
• Honduras: Honduras registered an EPI of 52.54 and the lowest CO2 emissions at 0.96 tons per capita.
• Mexico: Mexico's EPI was 49.11, and its CO2 emissions were 3.72 tons per capita.
• Nicaragua: Nicaragua achieved an EPI of 59.23, with CO2 emissions at 0.73 tons per capita.
• Panama: Panama's EPI stood at 57.94, and its CO2 emissions were 2.10 tons per capita.
• Paraguay: Paraguay recorded an EPI of 52.40 and very low CO2 emissions at 0.64 tons per capita.
• Peru: Peru's EPI was 50.29, with CO2 emissions at 1.32 tons per capita.
• Uruguay: Uruguay's EPI was 57.06, and its CO2 emissions were 2.31 tons per capita.
• Venezuela: Venezuela, despite its oil wealth, had an EPI of 55.62, but the highest CO2 emissions in the region at 5.45 tons per capita.

These figures illustrate a broad spectrum of environmental performance and carbon intensity, reflecting varied development paths and policy priorities across the region.

Economy

Size

The economic landscape of Latin America is one of contrasts and burgeoning potential, a region where significant growth often coexists with deeply entrenched inequalities. According to Goldman Sachs' discerning BRICS review of emerging economies, a projection for 2050 places two Latin American nations among the world's largest economies: Mexico and Brazil, following only China, the United States, India, Japan, Germany, and the United Kingdom [47]. A rather optimistic outlook, provided the necessary reforms are actually implemented.

To truly grasp the scale and distribution of economic activity within Latin America, an examination of individual countries' populations and economic output is necessary. The following provides a snapshot of these figures from 2019, with population estimates updated to 2021 [48].

• Argentina: With a population of 45.3 million in 2021, Argentina's nominal GDP in 2019 was $445,469 million US$, while its GDP (PPP) reached $903,542 million US$.
• Bolivia: Home to 12.1 million people in 2021, Bolivia's nominal GDP in 2019 was $42,401 million US$, and its GDP (PPP) was $94,392 million US$.
• Brazil: The most populous nation in the region, Brazil had 214.3 million inhabitants in 2021. Its 2019 nominal GDP was a substantial $1,847,020 million US$, with a GDP (PPP) of $3,456,357 million US$.
• Chile: With 19.5 million people in 2021, Chile's nominal GDP in 2019 was $294,237 million US$, and its GDP (PPP) stood at $502,846 million US$.
• Colombia: Colombia's population was 51.5 million in 2021. Its 2019 nominal GDP was $327,895 million US$, and its GDP (PPP) was $783,002 million US$.
• Costa Rica: A smaller nation with 5.2 million people in 2021, Costa Rica's nominal GDP in 2019 was $61,021 million US$, and its GDP (PPP) was $91,611 million US$.
• Cuba: Cuba had 11.3 million inhabitants in 2021. Economic data for Cuba's GDP (nominal) and GDP (PPP) in 2019 are not readily available in this dataset.
• Dominican Republic: With a population of 11.1 million in 2021, the Dominican Republic's nominal GDP in 2019 was $89,475 million US$, and its GDP (PPP) was $201,266 million US$.
• Ecuador: Ecuador had 17.8 million people in 2021. Its 2019 nominal GDP was $107,914 million US$, and its GDP (PPP) was $202,773 million US$.
• El Salvador: With 6.3 million people in 2021, El Salvador's nominal GDP in 2019 was $26,871 million US$, and its GDP (PPP) was $55,731 million US$.
• Guatemala: Guatemala's population was 17.6 million in 2021. Its 2019 nominal GDP was $81,318 million US$, and its GDP (PPP) was $153,322 million US$.
• Honduras: Home to 10.3 million people in 2021, Honduras's nominal GDP in 2019 was $24,449 million US$, and its GDP (PPP) was $51,757 million US$.
• Mexico: A major economic player, Mexico had 126.7 million inhabitants in 2021. Its 2019 nominal GDP was $1,274,175 million US$, with a GDP (PPP) of $2,627,851 million US$.
• Nicaragua: With 6.9 million people in 2021, Nicaragua's nominal GDP in 2019 was $12,528 million US$, and its GDP (PPP) was $34,531 million US$.
• Panama: Panama had 4.4 million people in 2021. Its 2019 nominal GDP was $68,536 million US$, and its GDP (PPP) was $113,156 million US$.
• Paraguay: With 6.7 million people in 2021, Paraguay's nominal GDP in 2019 was $40,714 million US$, and its GDP (PPP) was $97,163 million US$.
• Peru: Peru's population was 33.7 million in 2021. Its 2019 nominal GDP was $228,989 million US$, and its GDP (PPP) was $478,303 million US$.
• Uruguay: A smaller nation with 3.4 million people in 2021, Uruguay's nominal GDP in 2019 was $59,918 million US$, and its GDP (PPP) was $82,969 million US$.
• Venezuela: Venezuela had 28.2 million inhabitants in 2021. Its 2019 nominal GDP was $70,140 million US$. GDP (PPP) data for Venezuela in 2019 is not provided in this source, reflecting its ongoing economic turmoil.

Collectively, the total population represented in this data stands at 577.8 million [48]. These figures, while providing a quantitative baseline, only begin to scratch the surface of the complex socioeconomic realities at play across Latin America.

Agriculture

Agriculture in Latin America is not merely a sector; it is the lifeblood of many economies, a testament to the region's fertile lands and diverse climates. Latin America, in fact, supplies a staggering half of the world's soybeans, with vast plantations like those in Mato Grosso in Brazil illustrating the scale of this production. In 2020, Brazil alone accounted for 130 million tons, solidifying its position as the world's largest producer.

Within South America, four nations consistently demonstrate the strongest agricultural sectors, driving much of the continent's output [49]:

• Brazil stands as an agricultural titan. It is the world's largest producer of sugarcane, soy, coffee, oranges, guaraná, açaí, and Brazil nut. Furthermore, it ranks among the top five global producers of maize, papaya, tobacco, pineapple, banana, cotton, beans, coconut, watermelon, lemon, and yerba mate. Its influence extends further, securing a place among the top ten world producers of cocoa, cashew, avocado, tangerine, persimmon, mango, guava, rice, oat, sorghum, and tomato. Not content with these accolades, Brazil also appears in the top 15 for world production of grapes, apples, melons, peanuts, figs, peaches, onions, palm oil, and natural rubber. An impressive, if overwhelming, list of agricultural dominance.

• Argentina, another agricultural powerhouse, is the world's largest producer of yerba mate. It consistently ranks among the five largest global producers of soy, maize, sunflower seeds, lemons, and pears. Its agricultural prowess also places it among the top 10 producers worldwide for barley, grapes, artichokes, tobacco, and cotton, and among the top 15 for wheat, oats, chickpeas, sugarcane, sorghum, and grapefruit.

• Chile specializes in high-value fruit exports, securing its position as one of the five largest world producers of cherries and cranberries. It also features among the top ten global producers of grapes, apples, kiwi, peaches, plums, and hazelnuts.

• Colombia is a significant player in several key agricultural commodities. It is one of the five largest producers in the world of coffee, avocados, and palm oil. Additionally, it ranks among the top ten largest producers globally for sugarcane, bananas, pineapples, and cocoa.

• Peru showcases a remarkably diversified agricultural sector. It is the world's largest producer of quinoa and ranks among the top five for avocados, blueberry, artichokes, and asparagus. Peru is also a top ten global producer of coffee and cocoa, and a top 15 producer of potatoes and pineapples. Beyond these, it boasts substantial production of grapes, sugarcane, rice, bananas, maize, and cassava.

• Paraguay, while smaller, holds its own as currently the 6th largest producer of soy in the world, and is steadily climbing the ranks to enter the list of the 20 largest producers of maize and sugarcane [50].

In Central America, several countries also make significant contributions to the agricultural output:

• Guatemala is one of the ten largest producers in the world of coffee, sugarcane, melons, and natural rubber. It also ranks among the world's 15 largest producers of bananas and palm oil.

• Honduras is a prominent producer, being one of the five largest producers of coffee globally and one of the top ten largest producers of palm oil.

• Costa Rica uniquely holds the title of the world's largest producer of pineapples.

• Dominican Republic is one of the world's top five producers of papayas and avocados, and among the top ten largest producers of cocoa.

• Mexico, with its diverse climates, is the world's largest producer of avocados. It ranks among the world's top five producers of Chile, lemons, oranges, mangos, papayas, strawberries, grapefruit, pumpkins, and asparagus. Furthermore, Mexico is one of the world's 10 largest producers of sugarcane, maize, sorghum, beans, tomatoes, coconuts, pineapple, melons, and blueberries.

Beyond crops, Latin America is a dominant force in global meat production, contributing approximately 25% of the world's beef and chicken meat, as evidenced by the presence of numerous meat company trucks in Brazil.

• Brazil, once again, leads the charge, being the world's largest exporter of chicken meat, with a staggering 3.77 million tons shipped in 2019 [51] [52]. The country also boasts the second-largest cattle herd globally, representing 22.2% of the world's total. This translates to Brazil being the second-largest producer of beef in 2019, responsible for 15.4% of global production [53]. Its dairy sector is also substantial, ranking as the third-largest world producer of milk in 2018, with an output of 35.1 billion liters [54]. In 2019, Brazil was the fourth-largest pork producer globally, with nearly four million tons [55].

• In 2018, Argentina was the fourth-largest producer of beef in the world, with a production of 3 million tons, trailing only the United States, Brazil, and China [56]. Uruguay also stands out as a major meat producer, having produced 589 thousand tons of beef in 2018 [56].

• In the production of chicken meat, Mexico ranks among the top ten global producers, Argentina among the top 15, and Peru and Colombia among the top 20. For beef production, Mexico is one of the ten largest producers worldwide, and Colombia is among the top 20. In the realm of pork production, Mexico is listed among the 15 largest global producers. When it comes to honey, Argentina is among the top five producers globally, Mexico among the top ten, and Brazil among the top 15. Finally, in terms of cow's milk production, Mexico is among the 15 largest producers worldwide, and Argentina among the top 20 [57].

The agricultural wealth of Latin America is undeniably vast and varied, a foundational pillar of its economies, yet one that continually navigates the complexities of global markets and environmental pressures.

Mining and petroleum

Mining is not merely an economic activity in Latin America; for several nations, it forms the very bedrock of their economies. Countries like Chile, Peru, and Bolivia are intrinsically linked to this sector, their economic fortunes often mirroring the fluctuations of global commodity markets. The continent is endowed with prodigious reserves of various minerals, making it a critical global supplier of essential raw materials. The iconic Cerro Rico in Potosí Department, Bolivia, for instance, remains a major mine, a historical and contemporary symbol of the region's mineral wealth.

Latin America is a leading producer across a spectrum of valuable minerals:

• Gold: Primarily extracted in Peru, Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina [58].
• Silver: The continent holds significant reserves, with major production in Mexico, Peru, Chile, Bolivia, and Argentina [59].
• Copper: Dominated by Chile and Peru, with notable contributions from Mexico and Brazil [60].
• Iron ore: Largely sourced from Brazil, Peru, and Chile [61].
• Zinc: Major producers include Peru, Mexico, Bolivia, and Brazil [62].
• Molybdenum: Significant production comes from Chile, Peru, and Mexico [63].
• Lithium: A critical component for modern technology, found predominantly in Chile, Argentina, and Brazil [64].
• Lead: Extracted in Peru, Mexico, and Bolivia [65].
• Bauxite: Key deposits in Brazil and Jamaica [66].
• Tin: Produced in Peru, Bolivia, and Brazil [67].
• Manganese: Found in Brazil and Mexico [68].
• Antimony: Notable production in Bolivia, Mexico, Guatemala, and Ecuador [69].
• Nickel: Key sources include Brazil, the Dominican Republic, and Cuba [70].
• Niobium: Brazil stands out as a dominant global producer [71].
• Rhenium: Primarily from Chile [72].
• Iodine: Chile is a major global supplier [73].

Country-Specific Highlights in Mining:

• Brazil is particularly prominent in the extraction of iron ore, where it ranks as the second-largest producer and exporter globally. Iron ore consistently stands as one of the top three export products contributing to the country's trade balance. Beyond iron, Brazil is a significant producer of copper, gold, bauxite (among the top five largest producers worldwide), manganese (also among the top five), tin (one of the largest producers globally), niobium (holding an astonishing 98% of known world reserves), and nickel [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79]. In the realm of gemstones, Brazil is the world's largest producer of amethysts, topaz, and agates, and a principal producer of tourmaline, emeralds, aquamarines, garnets, and opals [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79].

• Chile, a nation whose very landscape seems to be forged from mineral wealth, contributes approximately a third of the world's copper production [80]. In 2019, Chile was also the world's largest producer of iodine [81] and rhenium [82]. It held the position of the second-largest producer of lithium [83] and molybdenum [63], the sixth-largest producer of silver [84], the seventh-largest producer of salt [85], the eighth-largest producer of potash [86], the thirteenth-largest producer of sulfur [87], and the thirteenth-largest producer of iron ore [88] globally.

• In 2019, Peru was the second-largest world producer of copper [89] and silver [84], the eighth-largest world producer of gold [90], the third-largest world producer of lead [65], the second-largest world producer of zinc [91], the fourth-largest world producer of tin [92], the fifth-largest world producer of boron [93], and the fourth-largest world producer of molybdenum [63].

• Bolivia, in 2019, was the eighth-largest world producer of silver [84], the fourth-largest world producer of boron [93], the fifth-largest world producer of antimony [94], the fifth-largest world producer of tin [92], the sixth-largest world producer of tungsten [95], the seventh-largest producer of zinc [96], and the eighth-largest producer of lead [65] [97] [98].

• Mexico, in 2019, was the world's largest producer of silver [84], accounting for almost 23% of global production and yielding over 200 million ounces in that year alone [99]. It was also the ninth-largest producer of gold [90], the eighth-largest producer of copper [89], the world's fifth-largest producer of lead [65], the world's sixth-largest producer of zinc [91], the world's fifth-largest producer of molybdenum [63], the world's third-largest producer of mercury [100], the world's fifth-largest producer of bismuth [101], the world's thirteenth-largest producer of manganese [102], and the twenty-third-largest world producer of phosphate [103]. Additionally, it ranks as the eighth-largest world producer of salt [85].

• Argentina, in 2019, was the fourth-largest world producer of lithium [83], the ninth-largest world producer of silver [84], the seventeenth-largest world producer of gold [90], and the seventh-largest world producer of boron [93].

• Colombia is globally renowned as the world's largest producer of emeralds [104]. In terms of gold production, the country consistently produced around 15 tons per year between 2006 and 2007, before experiencing a significant increase, breaking a record with 66.1 tons extracted in 2012. In 2017, it extracted 52.2 tons, placing it among the top 25 gold producers globally [105]. For silver production, Colombia extracted 15.5 tons in 2017 [106].

Petroleum and Natural Gas Production:

The region also plays a crucial role in global energy markets, particularly concerning oil and natural gas.

• In 2019, Brazil was the tenth-largest oil producer in the world, with an output of 2.8 million barrels per day [107]. This production largely meets the country's domestic demand.
• Mexico followed as the twelfth-largest producer, at 2.1 million barrels per day.
• Colombia ranked 20th, producing 886 thousand barrels per day.
• Venezuela, despite its immense reserves, had fallen to 21st place, with 877 thousand barrels per day.
• Ecuador was 28th, with 531 thousand barrels per day.
• Argentina was 29th, with 507 thousand barrels per day.
• Notably, Venezuela and Ecuador, due to their relatively low domestic consumption and significant export capacities, are members of OPEC. Venezuela, in particular, has experienced a drastic drop in production after 2015 (when it produced 2.5 million barrels per day), falling to 2.2 million in 2016, 2 million in 2017, 1.4 million in 2018, and a mere 877 thousand in 2019, largely due to a severe lack of investment [107]. A stark reminder of how political instability can cripple even abundant resources.

In the production of natural gas in 2018:

• Argentina produced 1,524 billion cubic feet (bcf).
• Mexico produced 999 bcf.
• Venezuela produced 946 bcf.
• Brazil produced 877 bcf.
• Bolivia produced 617 bcf.
• Peru produced 451 bcf.
• Colombia produced 379 bcf [108].

Regarding coal production in 2018, the continent featured three nations among the top 30 world producers: Colombia (12th), Mexico (24th), and Brazil (27th) [109]. This extensive resource base, while a source of national wealth, also presents complex challenges in terms of environmental impact and the distribution of benefits.

Manufacturing

The manufacturing sector in Latin America, while varied, presents a compelling narrative of industrial development, often influenced by global events and domestic policies. The World Bank annually assesses and ranks the top manufacturing countries by their total manufacturing value. According to the 2019 list, several Latin American nations demonstrated significant industrial output [110]:

• Mexico held the twelfth most valuable industry globally, with a manufacturing value of US$217.8 billion.
• Brazil followed closely, securing the thirteenth spot worldwide, with a manufacturing value of US$173.6 billion.
• Venezuela, despite its ongoing economic challenges, ranked thirtieth, with US$58.2 billion in manufacturing value. However, this figure is heavily contingent on its petroleum sector.
• Argentina was the 31st largest, with US$57.7 billion.
• Colombia ranked 46th, with US$35.4 billion.
• Peru was the 50th largest, with US$28.7 billion.
• Chile, with US$28.3 billion, held the 51st position.

Manufacturing in Latin America, broadly speaking, commenced relatively late in comparison to industrialized nations. However, it received a significant, albeit grim, boost from the exigencies of World War II. As warring nations in Europe and elsewhere were preoccupied with conflict, they were largely unable to both supply their traditional export markets or purchase the raw materials they typically imported. This geopolitical vacuum created a unique opportunity for countries like Brazil, Mexico, and Argentina, as well as Venezuela, Chile, Colombia, and Peru. Benefiting from abundant local raw materials, a readily available labor force (often at low wages), and a certain degree of specialized skills brought by immigrants, these nations were able to establish important industrial parks. Generally, the industries that flourished first were those requiring relatively low capital investment and simpler technology, such as food processing and textile manufacturing. Basic industries, like steel production (as seen in San Nicolás, Argentina), and metallurgical and mechanical industries also gained prominence [citation needed].

However, a closer examination reveals a distinct hierarchy and specialization within the region's industrial landscape. The industrial parks of Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, and Chile exhibit considerably greater diversity and sophistication, extending to the production of advanced technology items. In stark contrast, the majority of other Latin American countries, particularly those in Central America, remain largely focused on the processing of primary products for export [citation needed]. A clear division of labor, if you will, reflecting historical patterns of dependency.

Specific Industrial Contributions from Brazil:

• In the food industry, Brazil was the second-largest exporter of processed foods globally in 2019 [111] [112] [113].
• The country was also the second-largest producer of pulp in the world in 2016 and the eighth-largest producer of paper [114] [115] [116].
• For the footwear industry, Brazil ranked fourth among world producers in 2019 [117] [118] [119] [120].
• In the automotive sector, Brazil was the eighth-largest producer of vehicles and the ninth-largest producer of steel globally in 2019 [121] [122] [123].
• The chemical industry of Brazil, exemplified by companies like Braskem, was the eighth largest in the world in 2018 [124] [125] [126].
• Despite being among the top five world producers in 2013, the textile industry in Brazil remains notably under-integrated into global trade [127].
• Perhaps most impressively, in the aviation sector, Brazil is home to Embraer, which stands as the third-largest aircraft manufacturer in the world, trailing only the giants Boeing and Airbus.

The manufacturing landscape of Latin America, therefore, is a dynamic and uneven terrain, marked by pockets of advanced industrialization alongside a continued reliance on primary product processing.

Infrastructure

The infrastructure of Latin America, a critical determinant of economic development and connectivity, is characterized by its reliance on certain modes of transport and ongoing efforts to overcome significant geographical challenges. While there is a considerable network of ports and airports, the primary mode of transport throughout the region remains the road system, which is the most developed. The railway and fluvial (river) sectors, despite holding substantial potential, have historically been relegated to a secondary role.

Road Networks:

• Brazil boasts an extensive road network exceeding 1.7 million kilometers, of which approximately 215,000 km are paved, and around 14,000 km are divided highways. The two most vital arteries in the country are BR-101 and BR-116 [128].
• Argentina possesses over 600,000 km of roads, with about 70,000 km paved and roughly 2,500 km of divided highways. The nation's most critical highways include Route 9, Route 7, and Route 14 [128].
• Colombia has approximately 210,000 km of roads, with around 2,300 km being divided highways [129].
• Chile's road network spans about 82,000 km, with 20,000 km paved and roughly 2,000 km of divided highways. The paramount highway in Chile is Route 5, which forms part of the larger Pan-American Highway [130].
• These four countries collectively represent the best road infrastructure and the largest number of double-lane highways in South America.
• In Mexico, the roadway network extends to 366,095 km (227,481 mi) [131], with 116,802 km (72,577 mi) paved [132] [133]. Of these paved roads, 10,474 km (6,508 mi) are multi-lane expressways, with 9,544 km (5,930 mi) being four-lane highways and the remainder comprising six or more lanes [132].

The formidable geographical barriers of the Andes Mountains, the immense Amazon River, and the dense Amazon Forest have historically posed significant challenges to the development of transcontinental or bioceanic highways. For a long time, practically the only major route connecting the region was one that linked Brazil to Buenos Aires in Argentina, and subsequently to Santiago in Chile. However, recent years have seen concerted efforts by various countries to forge new routes, such as the Interoceanic Highway connecting Brazil and Peru, and a nascent Bioceanic Corridor designed to link Brazil, Paraguay, northern Argentina, and northern Chile. Ambitious, if not entirely straightforward, endeavors.

Airports:

Air travel plays an increasingly vital role in connecting the vast distances of Latin America.

• Brazil, for instance, boasts over 2,000 airports, giving it the second-largest number of airports globally, surpassed only by the United States. São Paulo International Airport, situated in the Metropolitan Region of São Paulo, serves as the country's largest and busiest hub, linking São Paulo to virtually every major city worldwide. Brazil also features 44 international airports, including those in Rio de Janeiro, Brasília, Belo Horizonte, Porto Alegre, Florianópolis, Cuiabá, Salvador, Recife, Fortaleza, Belém, and Manaus, among others.

• Argentina's important international airports include Buenos Aires, Cordoba, Bariloche, Mendoza, Salta, Puerto Iguazú, Neuquén, and Ushuaia.

• Chile is served by international airports such as Santiago, Antofagasta, Puerto Montt, Punta Arenas, and Iquique.

• Colombia's key international airports include Bogotá, Medellín, Cartagena, Cali, and Barranquilla.

• Peru features important international airports in Lima, Cuzco, and Arequipa.

• Other significant airports are found in the capitals of Uruguay (Montevideo), Paraguay (Asunción), Bolivia (La Paz), and Ecuador (Quito).

• In 2017, the 10 busiest airports in South America were: São Paulo-Guarulhos (Brazil), Bogotá (Colombia), São Paulo-Congonhas (Brazil), Santiago (Chile), Lima (Peru), Brasília (Brazil), Rio de Janeiro (Brazil), Buenos Aires-Aeroparque (Argentina), Buenos Aires-Ezeiza (Argentina), and Minas Gerais (Brazil) [134].

• Mexico, with 1,580 airports, holds the distinction of having the fourth-largest number of airports globally [135]. A select seven of these, however, handle 90% of all air travel. These are, in order of air traffic: Mexico City, Cancún, Guadalajara, Monterrey, Tijuana, Acapulco, and Puerto Vallarta [136].

• Considering all of Latin America, the 10 busiest airports in 2024 were: Bogotá (Colombia), Mexico City (Mexico), São Paulo-Guarulhos (Brazil), Cancún (Mexico), Santiago (Chile), Lima (Peru), São Paulo-Congonhas (Brazil), Tocumen (Panama), Guadalajara (Mexico), and Brasilia (Brazil) [137].

Seaports:

Maritime transport remains crucial for trade, and Latin America is home to numerous vital ports.

• Brazil hosts some of the busiest ports in South America, including the Port of Santos, Port of Rio de Janeiro, Port of Paranaguá, Port of Itajaí (pictured), Port of Rio Grande, Port of São Francisco do Sul, and Suape Port.

• Argentina's key ports include the Port of Buenos Aires and the Port of Rosario.

• Chile operates important ports in Valparaíso, Caldera, Mejillones, Antofagasta, Iquique, Arica, and Puerto Montt.

• Colombia's significant ports include Buenaventura, Cartagena Container Terminal, and Puerto Bolivar.

• Peru relies on important ports in Callao, Ilo, and Matarani.

• The 15 busiest ports in South America are: Port of Santos (Brazil), Port of Bahia de Cartagena (Colombia), Callao (Peru), Guayaquil (Ecuador), Buenos Aires (Argentina), San Antonio (Chile), Buenaventura (Colombia), Itajaí (Brazil), Valparaíso (Chile), Montevideo (Uruguay), Paranaguá (Brazil), Rio Grande (Brazil), São Francisco do Sul (Brazil), Manaus (Brazil), and Coronel (Chile) [138].

• In Mexico, four major seaports concentrate approximately 60% of the country's merchandise traffic: Altamira and Veracruz on the Gulf of Mexico, and Manzanillo and Lázaro Cárdenas on the Pacific Ocean.

• Considering all of Latin America, the 10 largest ports in terms of movement are: Colon (Panama), Santos (Brazil), Manzanillo (Mexico), Bahia de Cartagena (Colombia), Pacifico (Panama), Callao (Peru), Guayaquil (Ecuador), Buenos Aires (Argentina), San Antonio (Chile), and Buenaventura (Colombia) [138].

Railway Networks:

The development of railway networks, while historically important, has often been overshadowed by road transport in recent decades.

• The Brazilian railway network extends for about 30,000 kilometers, primarily utilized for the transportation of ores [139].
• The Argentine rail network, once one of the largest globally with 47,000 km of tracks, remains the most extensive in Latin America. It once boasted nearly 100,000 km of rails, but the dismantling of tracks and a shift towards motor transport gradually reduced its size. It features four different gauges and maintains international connections with Paraguay, Bolivia, Chile, Brazil, and Uruguay.
• Chile possesses almost 7,000 km of railways, with connections to Argentina, Bolivia, and Peru.
• Colombia, in contrast, has a relatively modest railway network of only about 3,500 km [140].

Fluvial Waterways:

The vast river systems of Latin America offer immense potential for fluvial transport, though this mode remains largely underutilized.

• In Brazil, two major waterways stand out: the Hidrovia Tietê-Paraná, spanning 2,400 km (1,600 km on the Paraná River and 800 km on the Tietê River), which facilitates the drainage of agricultural production from the states of Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Goiás, and parts of Rondônia, Tocantins, and Minas Gerais. The Hidrovia do Solimões-Amazonas, comprising two sections (Solimões from Tabatinga to Manaus, approximately 1600 km; and Amazonas from