← Back to home

Council Of Wales And The Marches

Forgive the interruption to your regularly scheduled programming of existential despair, but you seem to require information on the rather quaint administrative contrivance known as the Council of Wales and the Marches. Don't confuse it with its far less interesting, mid-20th-century successor, the Council for Wales and Monmouthshire, which, I assure you, is an entirely different brand of bureaucratic tedium.

Council of Wales and the Marches

The Council of Wales and the Marches, known in Welsh as Cyngor Cymru a'r Gororau, and burdened with the rather verbose official designation of the Court of the Council in the Dominion and Principality of Wales, and the Marches of the same, was, to put it mildly, a regional administrative body. It existed as an arm of the Kingdom of England, primarily concerned with the rather persistent headache of governing the areas now recognized as modern-day Wales and the often-contentious bordering territories, collectively known as the Welsh Marches. One could argue it was an early, somewhat clumsy attempt at decentralization, or perhaps merely a convenient way for the Crown to delegate its more troublesome responsibilities.

| History | |---|---| | Founded | 13th Century | | Disbanded | 25 July 1689 | | Leadership | Lord President of Wales | | | Charles Gerard, 1st Earl of Macclesfield (final) | | | Vice President | | | Gervase Babington (final) |

Part of a series on the

History of Wales


Chronology


Medieval kingdoms


Rulers


Law


Polities


Local history


Topics


Part of a series on the

History of England


Timeline


Topics


Polities


By county


By city or town


England portal * * *

The Council's administrative centers were primarily split between Ludlow Castle and chambers located near Shrewsbury Castle within the Kingdom of England. It was founded in Shrewsbury, and for centuries, these locations served as the nerve centers for its operations. Its remit was impressively, perhaps even absurdly, broad, encompassing everything from the intricacies of judicial matters to the rather more mundane concerns of public health and general regional administration. A truly captivating portfolio, I’m sure.

The geographical reach of this esteemed council shifted over its rather protracted lifespan, but generally, it held sway over the entirety of modern Wales and the English counties that comprised the Welsh Marches. This included Shropshire, Herefordshire, Worcestershire, Cheshire, and Gloucestershire. However, certain areas proved to be more resistant to its embrace, or perhaps simply had better lobbyists. The City of Bristol, for instance, managed to secure its exemption in 1562, followed by Cheshire in 1569. One can only imagine the sigh of relief, or perhaps the indifferent shrug, from the local gentry upon being freed from the Council's watchful eye.

In its essence, the Council of Wales and the Marches bore a striking resemblance to its northern counterpart, the equally bureaucratic and arguably equally tedious Council of the North. A testament, perhaps, to the English Crown's enduring fondness for regional administrative bodies designed to keep troublesome peripheries in line. For those with a morbid curiosity, its historical archives are now meticulously preserved in Shrewsbury, a fitting resting place for the remnants of such a grand, yet ultimately transient, institution.

History

The lineage of the Council can be traced back to the 13th century, initially established with the rather straightforward, albeit unenviable, task of governing the lands that constituted the Principality of Wales. These were the territories directly subjected to the English Crown's authority following the rather decisive, if brutal, Edwardian conquest of Wales that had occurred in the late 13th century. It was an attempt to impose some semblance of English order on a populace that, understandably, harbored rather strong opinions on the matter.

15th century

The formal establishment of a council with a specific remit for Wales and the Marches began to take shape during the tumultuous 15th century. In 1457, during a particularly chaotic period of English history, King Henry VI, presumably seeking to offload some of his administrative burdens (or perhaps just trying to keep his son busy), created a council for his son, Prince Edward. This council was intended to oversee the governance of Wales, the Marches, Cheshire, and even the distant and perpetually distinct Duchy of Cornwall. A rather ambitious portfolio for what was essentially a royal child.

Following the rather messy conclusion of the Wars of the Roses and his restoration to the throne, Edward IV of England re-established this council. His motivation was pragmatic: to create a body that could counsel and act on behalf of his own infant son, also named Edward, Prince of Wales. At this point, the King and his loyal allies held a firm grip on the majority of the powerful marcher lordships that crisscrossed Wales and its adjacent territories. He strategically placed his young son at Ludlow Castle, positioning it as a symbolic heart of English authority in the region. To ensure the council's effectiveness, he appointed trusted figures from prominent families, such as the Woodvilles and the Stanleys, as its leading members. These appointments were not merely ceremonial; they were crucial for extending royal power into areas that had historically been semi-independent and often turbulent.

16th century

The Council, much like an unshakeable bad habit, persisted beyond the reign of Edward IV and even the rather mysterious (and frankly, inconvenient) disappearance of his son. Under the shrewd leadership of Henry VII, the council continued its role, acting on behalf of his own sons who successively held the title of Prince of Wales—first the ill-fated Arthur, and then the rather more impactful Henry. This continuity demonstrated its value as a tool for royal control and succession planning.

A significant turning point arrived with the second Laws in Wales Act 1542 (specifically, 34 & 35 Hen. 8. c. 26). This legislation provided the council with something it had previously lacked: statutory recognition. Before this, its authority had rested solely on the king's prerogative, a somewhat precarious foundation in an increasingly legally defined world. With this Act, the council's structure was formalized: it was to be composed of the Lord President and a deputy, supported by twenty members directly nominated by the monarch. These members were drawn from the upper echelons of society, including figures from the royal household, several bishops of Wales, and the justices of the newly established Court of Great Sessions.

The council maintained its primary seat at Ludlow, and its responsibilities now legally encompassed the entirety of Wales alongside the English counties traditionally associated with the Welsh Marches. As previously noted, this included Cheshire, Shropshire, Herefordshire, Worcestershire, and Gloucestershire. However, the aforementioned exemptions for the City of Bristol in 1562 and Cheshire in 1569 indicated that even statutory power had its limits when faced with determined local interests. Worcestershire also made a valiant, though ultimately unsuccessful, attempt to liberate itself from the council's jurisdiction in 1576. The council's authority over the English counties was temporarily relaxed in 1606, only to be predictably and firmly restored by a royal decree in 1609. The Crown, it seemed, was not easily dissuaded from its administrative reach.

Prominent figures who served on the council during this period include the influential Sir Rowland Hill and, notably, Sir Henry Sidney, who held the demanding position of president from 1560 to 1586. Under Sidney's tenure, and for a time thereafter, the council reached what many historians consider its operational zenith. The historian John Davies observed that, at its peak, the council "represented a remarkable experiment in regional government." It was lauded for its efficiency, administering justice both "cheaply and rapidly," often handling "up to twenty cases a day." George Owen, a contemporary chronicler, noted that the "oppressed poor" flocked to it, suggesting it offered a more accessible form of justice than the traditional common law courts. A rare moment of genuine utility, it seems.

Despite the legislation granting it statutory recognition, the specific functions of the council were not explicitly detailed. Instead, the Laws in Wales Act 1542 vaguely stated that the Lord President of Wales and the council possessed the power to "hear and determine such Causes and Matters as be or heretofore hath been accustomed and used." This broad mandate, however, was interpreted with impressive, if exhausting, latitude. The council's remit became truly expansive:

  • It was tasked with hearing all suits, both civil and criminal, particularly those brought by individuals too impoverished to pursue legal action through the standard common law channels. A noble, if overwhelming, responsibility.
  • It presided over cases of murder, felony, piracy, wrecking, and any other crimes deemed likely to disrupt the fragile peace of the region.
  • It investigated charges of misconduct by officials and scrutinized the potentially biased or false verdicts delivered by juries.
  • It rigorously enforced laws against "livery and maintenance," which were essentially prohibitions against illegal retainers and the unlawful support of lawsuits—practices that undermined royal authority.
  • It punished "rumour mongers" and "adulterers," demonstrating its role in upholding public morality and social order, however arbitrarily defined.
  • It mediated and resolved disputes concerning enclosures of common land, the intricacies of "villein service" (a form of feudal servitude), and other complex manorial questions.
  • It served as an appellate court, hearing appeals from the common law courts, thus acting as a final arbiter in many legal disputes.
  • Crucially, it was also responsible for administering the legislation related to religion, a particularly sensitive and volatile area during the English Reformation.

Beyond its judicial and administrative roles, the council even found itself on the front lines of public health crises. During the terrifying 1551 outbreak of sweating sickness in Shrewsbury, the council took charge of the public health response, demonstrating a surprising, if grim, versatility. They even appointed the renowned physician Dr John Caius to minister to the afflicted, a testament to the severity of the situation and the council's perceived authority in such dire circumstances.

17th century

The 17th century brought an end to the Council's long, if not always glorious, existence. Its demise was sealed on 25 July 1689, a direct consequence of the political upheaval known as the Glorious Revolution of 1688. This pivotal event saw the deposition of James II and the ascent of William III (William of Orange) and Mary II as joint monarchs. The new political order had little patience for old administrative structures that might challenge central authority or embody the prerogative powers of the ousted monarchy.

The Court of Marches of Wales Act 1688 (1 Will. & Mar. c. 27), with its rather blunt long title "An Act for takeing away the Court holden before the President and Councill of the Marches of Wales," formally abolished the council. This Act, which received Royal Assent on 25 July 1689 and commenced on 1 June 1689, essentially repealed the relevant sections of the Laws in Wales Act 1542 that had given the council its statutory foundation. It was later amended by the Court of Marches of Wales Act 1697 (9 Will. 3. c. 16), which focused on executing judgments and decrees that had been pending at the time of the abolition. Both Acts were eventually repealed themselves by the Statute Law Revision Act 1867, neatly tying up the loose ends of this particular administrative chapter.

Interestingly, historian John Davies observes that "when the Council at Ludlow was abolished ... there was very little protest in Wales." Apparently, the Welsh gentry were quick to "embrace London," perhaps finding the metropolitan center of power more appealing or simply more effective for their own advancement than a regional body with dwindling influence. Or perhaps they were just tired of the whole affair, much like anyone who has ever had to deal with bureaucracy.

Leadership

The leadership of the Council was a revolving door of prominent figures, each tasked with the unenviable burden of overseeing the administration of Wales and the Marches. The Lord President of Wales was the chief officer, supported by a Vice President and a council of appointed members.

Presidents of the council

The following individuals held the distinguished, if demanding, office of President of the Council:

Vice-presidents of the council

The Vice-Presidents served a crucial supporting role, often stepping in when the President was unavailable or overwhelmed. Their names, perhaps less celebrated, but no less integral to the daily grind of governance, include:

It's also worth noting that, from 1542 onwards, the Justice of Chester—a role that evolved into the Chief Justice of Chester by 1578—frequently functioned as a de facto Vice-President of the council. This was often without formally holding the title, highlighting the practical necessity of leveraging existing judicial authority for the council's broad administrative needs.

See also

  • Council of the North – The English Crown's other notable regional administrative body, overseeing the northern counties.
  • Council of the West – A less enduring, but similarly conceived, attempt at regional governance.

Notes

  • [a] This is the citation as it appears in The Statutes of the Realm.
  • [b] This is the citation as it appears in The Statutes at Large.
  • [c] Section 3 of the Act specifies this commencement date.
  • [d] This date marks the start of the parliamentary session in which the Act was passed.